[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fnew-from-the-center-for-immigration-studies-9721 Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fnew-from-the-center-for-immigration-studies-9721)
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
Commentary
Kabuki Vetting of Afghans ([link removed])
By Mark Krikorian
National Review, August 30, 2021
Excerpt: There is no connection between the vetting of Afghans and their admission to the U.S. The moment the doors of a C-17 closed on the tarmac in Kabul, every Afghan on board, regardless of background or possible security threat, became a de facto permanent resident of the U.S. Anyone telling you otherwise is misinformed or mendacious.
Podcast
Chain Migration and Why It Matters ([link removed])
Moderator: Mark Krikorian
Guest: Jessica M. Vaughan
Parsing Immigration Policy, Episode 19
Featured Blog Posts
Report: Government Can’t Locate a Third of Alien Children It Released ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: If Biden won’t take the needed steps to stop unaccompanied minors from coming, he is on the hook for ensuring that they are properly placed in this country. Trump was hammered in 2018 when it was revealed that HHS had “lost track” of 1,475 UACs; Biden has “lost track” of more than triple that number.

Poll: Almost Half of the Electorate Deems Illegal Immigration a ‘Critical Threat’ ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: In a poll conducted between August 28 and 30 by Morning Consult and Politico of 1,997 registered voters, 55 percent of respondents disapproved of President Biden’s handling of immigration (41 percent “strongly”), and almost half (47 percent) saw “illegal immigration” as a “critical threat to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years”.

Is Biden’s Plan a Five-Year Path to Citizenship for Every Illegal Migrant? ([link removed])
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: Biden's proposed asylum changes would vastly expand eligibility and increase the number of illegal crossings at the border.

Welfare Use for Immigrants and Native-Born Households ([link removed])
By Steven A. Camarota
Excerpt: Analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies of the latest data (2018) from the Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) shows that welfare use by households headed by immigrants remains high relative to the native-born. The desire to reduce welfare among future immigrants was the primary justification for “public charge” rules issued by the Trump administration that have now been abandoned by the Biden administration.
More Blog Posts
* Immigration Court Completions Drop to 28-Year Lows ([link removed])
* DHS IG Fails to Report H-1B Usage by Controversial Contractor ([link removed])
* EB-5 Program Has More Generals than Privates ([link removed])
* Unnoticed: The Taliban’s Disastrous Emigration Polic ([link removed])

Donate ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** Google Plus ([link removed])
** LinkedIn ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
Copyright © 2021 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved.

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

** View this e-mail in your browser. ([link removed])