|
|
|
|
This is a
sponsored message from a Health Affairs partner.
|
|
|
|
You are receiving this email because you opted in to Health
Affairs Announcements, which include special offers, meeting discounts, job announcements, and news from our trusted partners.
|
|
|
|
TWO COMPLIMENTARY LISTENING SESSIONS ON CMMI PAYMENT MODELS HOSTED BY VIRTUAL VALUE-BASED PAYMENT SUMMIT - Sessions will Provide Input for CMMI Staff on Key Policy Issues
- CMMI staff will join in watch/listen-only mode
- Listening Session I: How Can ACO and Specialty
Models Co-exist?
- Monday, September 20, 2021 from 3:30 pm to 5 pm EDT
- Listening Session II: Supporting Primary Care Practices in Value-Based Care: Improving Primary and Specialty Care Collaboration within Federal Initiatives
- Wednesday, September 22, 2021 from 3:30 pm to 5 pm EDT
- Listening Sessions supported by a Grant from the Commonwealth Fund
- Media Partner: Health Affairs
- www.ValueBasedPaymentSummit.com
PRESS RELEASE Phone: 800-503-7414 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ValueBasedPaymentSummit.com
REGISTRATION FREE
WASHINGTON DC USA -- AUGUST 23, 2021: The Virtual Collocated Value-based Care Summit is pleased to announce that it will be offering two listening sessions on CMMI payment models which will provide input for CMMI staff on key policy issues. CMMI staff will join in watch/listen-only mode. Registrants may participate at no cost. Please see details below.
REGISTRATION DETAILS - REGISTRATION FREE - Click here to register for Listening Session I
- Click here to register for Listening Session II
- When registering you may express a preference for "Video Participation" or "Chat Participation"
- Requirements for "Video Participation":
- Agree to fully participate,
- Join session with video on, and
- Participate on mute unless called to comment by moderators
- Video Participation will be extremely limited (no more than 25 for each Listening Session). Accordingly, the great majority of attendees will be assigned to listen/watch-only mode Chat Participation.
- To register, individuals will provide basic personal information and are urged to provide brief written comments on the Listening Sessions discussion issues/questions. Said comments may be made anonymously at the choice of the attendee.
- Note that CMMI a staff will receive copies of all registration comments and text messages shared during the Listening Sessions.
PARTICIPATION ALTERNATIVES -
Individuals may register to participate for either or both sessions at no cost.
- To register, individuals will provide basic personal information and be invited to provide brief written comments on the Listening Sessions discussion issues/questions set forth below.
- Listening Sessions will be held on Zoom Webinar.
- Each Listening Session will be moderated.
- Two participation alternatives:
- Approximately 25 attendees will join an interactive, moderated video discussions of issues set forth below (Video Participation).
- All other attendees will participate on listen/watch-only mode with opportunity to participate via chat on Zoom platform (Chat Participation).
- CMMI staff will join
in watch/listen-only mode.
LISTENING SESSION I: HOW CAN ACO AND SPECIALTY MODELS CO-EXIST? - Monday, September 20, 2021 from 3:30 pm to 5 pm EDT
- Moderated by Francois de Brantes, MBA, SVP, Signify Health & Valinda Rutledge, MBA, EVP Federal Affairs, America's Physician Groups (APG)
- Issues to be discussed:
- Have you had success involving specialists? If not, what barriers have you experienced integrating single specialty and/or multi-specialty practices? If so, what does success look like?
- Are there certain specialty areas where you can influence costs as opposed to others, where you can't? If so, which areas and why?
- Does this differ for procedure episodes (e.g. hip or knee surgery) compared to complex, chronic medical conditions (e.g. cardiac care, oncology care)?
- How would you handle overlap if a distinct specialty model co-exists with an ACO? How would you avoid duplicate payments, as well as disincentives to join the models?
- Have any barriers prevented your involvement in total cost of care initiatives? If so, what would need to change to facilitate your involvement?
- If a specialty-focused model co-exists with a total cost of care model, how would you handle overlap? Do you have concerns with sharing risk?
- Is it possible to appropriately incentivize or encourage participation from both specialists and TCOC entities to engage in an integrated care model, such that sharing
risk is not a point of competition? Or Can the specialty care models be replaced by total cost of care models?
- What examples exist of TCOC entities doing exceptional work to align clinical and financial incentives with specialty care?
LISTENING SESSION II: SUPPORTING PRIMARY CARE PRACTICE IN VALUE-BASED CARE: PRIMARY CARE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SPECIALTY CARE WITHIN FEDERAL INITIATIVES - Wednesday, September 22, 2021 from 3:30 pm to 5 pm EDT
- Moderated by Richard J. Baron, MD, President & CEO, ABIM Foundation & Valinda Rutledge, MBA, EVP Federal Affairs, America's Physician Groups (APG)
- Issues to be discussed:
- When have
advanced primary care initiatives had success involving specialists? What did that success look like and how did they overcome the many known barriers to integrating care?
- In which specialty areas are advanced primary care practices more likely to influence costs and utilization effectively? Which specialty areas show less ability to be influenced by primary care, and should that be changed?
- Does this differ for procedure episodes (e.g. hip or knee surgery) compared to complex, chronic medical conditions (e.g. cardiac care, oncology care)? How about regions and practice types (IPAs, multi-specialty orgs, hospital-based health systems)?
- How does being part of an ACO make this work more or less effectively?
- Are there specific components of existing specialty-focused models that impair
incentives to coordinate a beneficiary's care with primary care?
- How would you handle overlap if a distinct CMMI specialty model co-exists with an advanced primary care model?
- How would you avoid duplicate payments?
- How to handle disincentives to participate in the models?
- Do you have concerns with sharing risk?
- Do the models need more coordination between them, and how would that happen?
- Should we avoid building new specialty-focused care models in favor of more broad or global organizational models? What are the trade-offs?
- Is it possible to appropriately encourage participation from both specialists and advanced primary care models to engage in an integrated
care model? How does that differ from ACO models?
- What quality metrics provide incentives for better primary/specialty care coordination?
- What flexibilities in Medicare program/payment rules would help improve coordination between primary and specialty care?
|
|
|
|
|
About Health Affairs
Health Affairs is the leading peer-reviewed journal at the intersection of health, health care, and policy. Published monthly by Project HOPE, the journal is available in print and
online. Late-breaking content is also found through healthaffairs.org, Health Affairs Today, and Health Affairs Sunday Update.
Project HOPE is a global health and humanitarian relief organization that places power in the hands of local health care workers to save lives across the globe. Project HOPE has published Health Affairs since 1981.
Copyright © Project HOPE: The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc. Health Affairs, 1220 19th Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036, United States
Privacy Policy
|
|
|
|
|