Dear Colleagues:
The resurgence of COVID via the “Delta variant” has school officials and parents looking for flexible learning options again. With the disruptions COVID caused to traditional school operations in the 2020-2021 school year, many parents took matters into their own hands and created learning pods, or small groups of students who met during the school day to continue their educations. As I wrote this week for redefinED’s relaunched online commentary and news site reimaginED, the obstacles to traditional schools that COVID continues to pose mean solutions such as learning pods are here to stay.
 
The difference this year is that parents, policymakers and educators have the benefit of hindsight—that is, they have the benefit of knowing what strategies are successful for forming and maintaining pods. As I explain in reimaginED, New Hampshire officials partnered with Prenda, a learning pod company based in Arizona, and are awarding grants to school districts to create learning pods. Two weeks ago, the New Hampshire Department of Education announced that four districts had been awarded grants to launch pods.
 
News reports from New Jersey and Florida say parents are forming pods again this year, while school officials in Arkansas say they are using small group sessions similar to learning pods.
 
Last year, lawmakers in states such as Maine and Pennsylvania tried to regulate pod activity by applying the same onerous rules to learning pods as lawmakers use to govern at-home daycare operations. Experts such as The Heritage Foundation’s Rachel Greszler have documented how such overregulation stifles small daycare operations, and as I explained for the State Policy Network last year, such rules could also stifle pods. But after pods’ successes in continuing student learning in the midst of traditional school closures, state lawmakers such as those in New Hampshire are making it easier for parents to form learning pods. That’s good news for families in the Granite State and others such as Texas, Louisiana and Georgia  where policymakers adopted proposals that should prevent agencies from overregulating pods.
 
You can learn more about pods here.
 
Elevator Pitch: Learning pods, small groups of students who meet during the school day to continue learning while traditional schools are in flux due to COVID, are here to stay.
 
What Else We’re Working On
 
Well said. Senior fellow Jay Greene joined Speech First’s Executive Director Cherise Trump to discuss his new paper with James Paul, “Diversity University: DEI Bloat in the Academy” on Speech First’s podcast “Well Said.” You can view the podcast here.
 
More Overreach from the Office for Civil Rights
 
Lindsey Burke and Sarah Parshall Perry, our colleague in the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, write about the Biden Administration’s use of the Office for Civil Rights to investigate states that don’t mandate masks in schools. As they explain:
 
To our knowledge, not a single state, school district, or individual school has banned students from wearing masks in the classroom.
 
Yet, the ever-politicized Office for Civil Rights within the U.S. Department of Education has decided to use the heft of the federal government to investigate states that don’t mandate children to wear masks.
 
The Office for Civil Rights tries to disguise the word “mandate” by using the term universal masking’ throughout its press release announcing the investigation of five states that have banned mask mandates.
 
Again, no state has banned “universal” masking; several have prohibited mask mandates. If any or every child in a school chooses to wear a mask, not a single state has ever suggested that’s a problem.
 
The Office for Civil Rights’ hunt once again expands the force of Washington into local school policy, as it also did under the Obama administration.”
 
Our Newest Addition
 
We would like to introduce the newest member of the team, John Schoof. John joins us as Research Associate and Project Coordinator, and this week he describes the K-12 landscape, including the vast number of new school choice options for families across the country as we begin the school year. You’ll hear from him in a couple weeks!
 
Upcoming Event
 
Please join us online for “Religious Liberty and Education: A Case Study of Yeshivas vs. New York,” on Tuesday, September 14 at 12:30 pm. RSVP here. Learn more:
 
Orthodox Jewish private schools, also known as yeshivas, have been under fire by critics alleging that some fail to provide a secular education that is “substantially similar” to that offered at traditional public schools. At the heart of this controversy lies a tension between two critically important interests in education that have implications far beyond the yeshiva world.
 
Parents have the right to choose an appropriate education for their children, while children have the right to receive a guaranteed minimum education. If preference is given to the former, how much freedom should parents have in choosing? If the latter, how does the state define what constitutes an appropriate education or measure the extent to which the end has been achieved?
 
THF 2021-09-02 Education Newsletter IMAGE.png
 
Sincerely,
Jonathan Butcher
 
Will Skillman Fellow in Education
The Center for Education Policy
Institute for Family, Community, and Opportunity
The Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE | Washington, D.C. 20002 | (800) 546-2843

You are subscribed to Heritage Foundation e-mails as [email protected]. If you want to change your e-mail preferences, please click here to update your subscription.


-