To talk about TANF is to talk about race

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]
By Senior Attorney Saima Akhtar and Staff Attorney Katharine Deabler ([link removed])

NCLEJ’s tagline is: People should thrive, not just survive.

We spend a lot time, in and out of court, advocating for people on the margins to have viable and dignified safety nets, regardless of where they live.

The truth is: There continues to be reticence about the value of a robust social safety net in this country-- and whether people living in poverty should actually have the economic security to leave a domestic violence situation, leave a job that threatens their well-being, or get their families out of extreme hardship.

TANF turned 25 on August 22, 2021. Here are five things you need to know:

(1) Other anti-poverty programs help reduce hardship, but TANF can be used to provide monthly direct cash assistance.

This means that parents can decide for themselves what their households need the most, including purchasing essential needs like school supplies, sanitizer, or diapers.

2) TANF is funded via a federal block grant that is fixed in dollar terms and gives states nearly full control over how they can spend it.

With states setting up their own TANF-funded programs, families who meet the eligibility requirements do not have equal access to the funds because the work and behavioral requirements and eligibility policies vary from state to state. For many families, direct cash assistance is completely out of reach.

(3) Let’s take a moment to talk about access.

#TANFat25 ([link removed]) is not a celebration. It's a reckoning, beginning with acknowledging that Black children are likelier to live in states with the lowest TANF benefit levels. For TANF to make a real dent in ending poverty, it needs to be available to those hardest-hit by poverty.

(4) Conditioning benefits on participation in mandatory work programs is one of TANF’s most racially driven policies.

This provision started with enslavement and continued with coerced labor practices. Federal policymakers should eliminate the federal requirements that states impose sanctions and mandate participation in work activities.

(5) The bottom line: To talk about TANF is to talk about race.

States with a higher concentration of Black residents have less generous and more punitive ([link removed]) TANF policies and spend less ([link removed]) of their block grant dollars on providing cash assistance, research shows.

The call to action is clear: We need federal and state policymakers to do more to ensure that low-income families have meaningful safety nets to stabilize them in and out of crisis.
What We're Reading:

This article in The Atlantic ([link removed]) poignantly illustrates how inefficiencies to public benefit systems inflict hardship on the very families who are already stretched.

Follow us on Twitter to get the latest case updates ([link removed])

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2021 National Center for Law and Economic Justice, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because of prior contact with NCLEJ. We collect addresses from those who opt in at our website, make an online donation, provide an email address with a mailed donation, or provide an email address at one of our fundraising events.

Our mailing address is:
National Center for Law and Economic Justice
275 Seventh Avenue #1506
New York, NY 10001
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]