It has become the great debate of the moment.
Which is more important: personal freedoms or the health and safety of the country?
Can the government and businesses and schools tell citizens that they have to get a shot? That they must wear a mask? That they must show a card or take a test to have a drink or see a concert or watch a play?
Those of us who believe in vaccines cannot understand those who refuse to get them and who vehemently advocate against protective measures such as masks. And the other side is dug in with their beliefs of personal rights.
This is just a small sample size, but USA Today published results Sunday of a COVID-19 poll it conducted with Ipsos for a story written by Washington bureau chief Susan Page and environmental and health inequities reporter Nada Hassanein. The poll — which was conducted online on Aug. 17 and 18 among 1,088 adults — showed that Americans say protecting the common good is more important than ensuring personal liberty when considering whether to require individuals to get a COVID-19 vaccination or wear a mask.
Among the key findings:
- 72% called mask mandates “a matter of health and safety” and not an infringement on personal safety.
- 61% said they endorsed requiring vaccinations except for those with a medical or religious exemption.
- 70% agreed individuals had a right to choose not to get the vaccine, but they didn’t have the right to be around the vaccinated.
- 66% supported state and local governments requiring masks.
- 62% supported employers requiring workers to get the vaccination.
- 68% supported businesses refusing service to the unvaccinated.
- 65% supported a ban on the unvaccinated traveling by airplane or mass transit.
- 65% supported sporting events and concerts barring the unvaccinated.
- 71% said colleges had a right to require students to be vaccinated to return to campus.
Then again, this continues to be a partisan and divisive topic. The poll also showed that 78% of Democrats said protecting the common good was more important than personal liberties, but 62% of Republicans said protecting personal liberty was more important.
That sentiment was evident Saturday during Donald Trump’s rally in Alabama. Trump told the crowd, “And you know what? I believe totally in your freedoms. I do. You’ve got to do what you have to do. But, I recommend: Take the vaccines. I did it. It’s good. Take the vaccines.”
Boos were heard after Trump said that.
Trump then tried to play it down the middle. When he heard the boos, he said, “No, that’s OK. That’s alright. You got your freedoms. But I happen to take the vaccine. If it doesn't work, you’ll be the first to know. OK? I’ll call up Alabama. I’ll say, hey, you know what? But (the vaccine) is working. But you do have your freedoms you have to keep. You have to maintain that.”
Do you?
You must watch this jaw-dropping video from The New York Times Opinion’s Alex Stockton and Lucy King: “Dying in the Name of Vaccine Freedom.” Watch it all the way to the end.
And finally, here’s a really thoughtful piece in The Atlantic from Silas House: “Some Americans No Longer Believe in the Common Good.”
Maddow’s new deal
Rachel Maddow isn’t going anywhere. After reports that she was considering leaving, MSNBC’s biggest prime-time star has signed a multiyear deal to stay with the network. Insider’s Claire Atkinson broke the story for Insider (note: story is behind a paywall).
The deal means Maddow will continue with the show that she has been hosting since 2009. It’s MSNBC’s highest-rated program. In the first quarter of 2021, Maddow’s show had an average total audience of 3.604 million viewers, making it the most-watched show on cable news. These days, she is averaging a little more than 2 million viewers a night, easily MSNBC’s most popular show.
As part of Maddow’s new deal, she also will develop other projects with NBCUniversal. The Wall Street Journal’s Ben Mullin has more on that. There also are reports, including from CNN’s Brian Stelter, that Maddow might shift from doing her show five nights a week to once a week sometime next year.
You would think NBCUniversal executives are breathing a sigh of relief over this deal. Not only is Maddow’s show extremely popular, but it has been noted by several media observers that MSNBC had no obvious replacement had Maddow left the network. Now they have at least a year to figure something out if Maddow’s show shifts to once a week.
Good news from Fox News
On Sunday, Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott sent a memo to staff with good news. She wrote:
“FOX News Media has successfully evacuated three Afghan nationals who formerly served as freelance associates, as well as an Afghan colleague from a regional media company, along with their respective families (a total of 24 people) from Kabul, Afghanistan. These associated include consultants who served as local producers, translators, drivers, and security guards supporting our correspondents throughout FOX’s coverage of the war in Afghanistan for nearly two decades.”
Fox News joined the growing list of other American media outlets — including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and CNN — that have helped local journalists and their families get out of Afghanistan.
Check out this story from The New York Times’ Michael M. Grynbaum, Tiffany Hsu and Katie Robertson: “How News Organizations Got Afghan Colleagues Out of Kabul.”
Ward’s exemplary work
Speaking of Afghanistan, CNN’s Clarissa Ward did incredible reporting in the days after Kabul fell to the Taliban, and she recounted some of that work, including her journey out of Afghanistan, during an interview on CNN’s “Reliable Sources’ with Brian Stelter.
Ward told Stelter about hundreds cramming into an enormous C-17 aircraft in the middle of the night.
“People are just so scared,” Ward said. “People are asking, ‘Where are we going? What happens next? My phone doesn’t work. Who do I contact? How will I find the rest of my family?’”
Ward added that after the plane took off, “It’s just this very, very strange sense of relief, but also sadness and guilt. Guilt like, ‘Why do we get to leave? Why are we so lucky and fortunate and tens of thousands of others are still pressing to try to get into that airport to try to get out safely.’”
Stelter also asked what point during the past week was the most perilous for Ward and her team. Ward said the worst part of covering conflict, other than having a gun pointed at you, is the uncertainty of what might happen next. She said waking up a week ago today — last Monday, the day after Kabul fell — was full of uncertainty. And despite not knowing what might happen next and how dangerous their situation might become, Ward and her team made the decision to not immediately evacuate so that they could “see this through. We had to stay on this story.”
After three weeks of working 19-hour days in Afghanistan and feeling totally exhausted, Ward and her team made the decision to leave on Friday.
“It’s certainly one of the most intense stories I've ever covered,” Ward said.
What a mess at ‘Jeopardy!’