Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Share Share
Immigration Policy as an Environmental Issue
Lawsuits demand environmental analysis of immigration measures,
as required by federal law
Follow Parsing Immigration Policy on RicochetApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSpotifyStitcherGoogle Podcasts
 
Washington D.C. (August 12, 2021) – Congress passed the “Magna Carta” of environmental law, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), more than 50 years ago. NEPA mandates that all federal agencies consider the environmental implications of actions before they are undertaken; the environmental impact statements are then required to be made public, so that individuals have the opportunity to comment on government actions that will affect their communities. The law begins with a "Congressional Declaration of National Environmental Policy" which identifies the impact of population growth as one of the law's chief concerns. Despite this, no environmental analysis has been performed on any immigration action in the decades since NEPA's passage, even though the federal government's main influence on U.S. population numbers comes through its immigration policies.

Julie Axelrod, the director of litigation for the Center for Immigration Studies, pioneered using NEPA to sue government agencies for not conducting environmental analysis on immigration actions. On this week’s episode of Parsing Immigration Policy, Axelrod discusses the NEPA lawsuits filed against the Department of Homeland Security for ignoring immigration actions in its NEPA procedures.

Axelrod said, “Congress did not exempt immigration actions from NEPA obligations. Policies that promote and encourage high levels of legal and illegal immigration impact the environment and impose costs on the public. NEPA analysis is required by law for a reason – it enables agencies to make decisions based on valid environment impact analysis and gives the public a chance to voice their opinions. NEPA lawsuits provide a much-needed check on the administrative state.”

In this week’s closing commentary, Mark Krikorian, the Center’s executive director and host of Parsing Immigration Policy, discusses a failed E-Verify amendment to the trillion-dollar infrastructure bill passed in the Senate this week. The amendment would have ensured infrastructure bill jobs would have gone to American workers by prohibiting federal funding for any entity that failed to enroll in E-Verify.
 
Visit Website
Donate
Related Articles:
Facebook
https://twitter.com/CIS_org
Google Plus
LinkedIn
RSS
Copyright © 2021 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved. 

Our mailing address is:
Center for Immigration Studies 1629 K St., NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006 USA

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.


View this e-mail in your browser.

This is the Center for Immigration Studies CISNews e-mail list.