[link removed]
Happy August!
Reminder: Please take our 1-min. reader survey
[link removed]
to weigh in on what you want to see in the Rundown. (Sneak peek at early results below!)
Join our external affairs team: We’re hiring a brand associate.
[link removed]
1. Exclusive: Power-sector emissions cuts to flatline by 2026
It’s not inevitable, but that’s the grim course we’re on if lower-carbon technologies and net-zero commitments don’t pick up steam, according to our first annual power-sector trends report
[link removed]
.
The good news: Many of America’s biggest energy companies and public utilities have already made significant pledges amounting to emissions reductions resulting in 56% of 2005 levels by 2050 — and we’ve seen solid progress over the last 15 years.
The bad: The easy part is over.
What’s clear: To keep emissions dropping, we urgently need smarter policies to get new energy innovations to market.
How we know: We partnered with Rhodium Group, a leading research firm that analyzes energy policies and climate risks, to model two possible scenarios.
What we found: If natural gas prices stay low, because of high load growth, power-sector emissions will stop falling by 2026 and stall through 2050 – at just 4% below where they are today.
Avoiding that won’t be easy, and the power sector’s current net-zero pledges won’t be enough.
Even if utilities nail them, the sector is on pace to emit over a gigaton of CO2 annually by 2050 — a gap we can’t close without more market-friendly policies boosting better technologies.
One cheap way to start — maintain existing nuclear reactors.
Plug in: Be the first to read Clear Path to a Clean Energy Future
[link removed]
, led by senior ClearPath researcher Spencer Nelson, for sharp analysis and modeling of our most promising policies and technologies.
Check out additional ClearPath reports and analyses here
[link removed]
.
2. BIB notes: Big boosts for clean energy
We read the entire bill of the Senate’s bipartisan infrastructure bill so you don’t have to — check out our snap take on all the top energy provisions in our Twitter thread
[link removed]
.
The big ones: Eagle-eyed investments in enhanced geothermal, advanced nuclear, carbon capture, and grid-scale storage.
Rich’s take: “This bipartisan energy agreement will keep America’s energy sector competitive long-term, especially with China.”
And the best part, “all of these provisions will be done in close partnership with private sector innovators who are working to maintain American energy jobs and create new clean energy markets.”
3. Around-the-clock clean electricity for federal facilities
A new bipartisan House proposal
[link removed]
would let the government ink long-term Power Purchase Agreements with newly constructed nuclear reactors — a win-win for the sector and American energy independence.
What’s clear: The Nuclear PPA Act sends early movers a powerful market signal that should help speed up developments in advanced nuclear.
How it works: The bill directs DOE to help other federal agencies tap into the technology’s unmatched capacity to provide reliable clean energy.
That’s especially key for off-grid or high-value federal facilities that deal with national security or need to maintain power during emergencies.
Cosponsors: Reps. Elaine Luria (D-VA) ... Dan Newhouse (R-WA) … Anthony Gonzalez (R-OH) ... and Scott Peters (D-CA).
4. 180+ groups call for carbon capture incentive
It’s the largest and most diverse group of companies and nonprofits to unite behind a common federal policy agenda for carbon capture and storage.
The open letter
[link removed]
calls on Congress to include a portfolio of priority 45Q tax credit improvements in any moving legislative package, including:
A direct-pay option and an end to annual carbon capture thresholds that deter innovation.
Higher credit values for industrial and power-plant carbon capture and direct air capture projects.
More time to start construction without losing the credit.
Regional networks for CO2 transport and storage.
Robust funding for commercial-scale demonstrations.
What’s clear: We agree on all points which is why we signed on.
5. ICYMI
DOE needs an “investor mindset” to fix funding for technology demonstrations, according to a new memo
[link removed]
from the Nuclear Innovation Alliance.
NIA’s rec: Tying federal funds to commercial milestones — not conventional cost reimbursement models — “reduces taxpayer risk, reduces project performance risks, and can accelerate commercialization.”
Even more details can be found in NIA’s 2019 report, In Search of a SpaceX For Nuclear Energy.
[link removed]
The Fusion Industry Association is also calling for DOE to implement a milestone-based approach
[link removed]
.
6. Coming down the pipeline
Two back-to-back events worth your time today:
2:00pm – NARUC and DOE stream a forum on grid reliability
[link removed]
and resilience in Puerto Rico and the Pacific Northwest.
2:30pm – The Breakthrough Institutehosts an energy infrastructure panel
[link removed]
featuring our own Jena Lococo.
So far, 70% of you say you want to see more legislative updates from our Hill team. Your opinions shape our coverage — so, feel the same?
Click here
[link removed]
to take our 4-question survey. And thank you — we really appreciate your input.
On that note, have a great weekend!
Did someone forward this to you? Sign up here
[link removed]
.
Miss a week? Catch up on our Rundown archive
[link removed]
.
Follow us on Twitter: @ClearPathAction
[link removed]
/ @powellrich
[link removed]
View this Rundown online
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
-->
[link removed]
Copyright © 2019 ClearPath Action, All rights reserved.
This email was sent to
[email protected]
why did I get this?
*|ABOUT_LIST|*
unsubscribe from this list
[link removed]
[link removed]
update subscription preferences
ClearPath, Inc.
518 C St NE Suite 300
Washington DC 20002