People might be willing to throw their bottles in the recycling can, but they won't live in cold homes while paying higher heating prices.
Wall Street Journal (7/31/21) reports: "Massachusetts is emerging as a key battleground in the U.S. fight over whether to phase out natural gas for home cooking and heating, with fears of unknown costs and unfamiliar technologies fueling much of the opposition to going all-electric. More towns around Boston are debating measures to block or limit the use of gas in new construction, citing concerns about climate change. The measures have encountered opposition from some home builders, utilities and residents in a state with cold winters, relatively high housing prices and aging pipeline networks in need of pricey repairs. The Massachusetts debate encapsulates the challenges many states face in pursuing aggressive measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that may directly impact consumers. The cost of fully electrifying buildings varies widely throughout the country and has ignited debates about who should potentially pay more, or change their habits, in the name of climate progress."
|
|
|
|
|
"Ultimately, solving the climate crisis will not be solved under the eco-apartheid conditions Van Jones warned us about, which we’re now seeing unfold. We have to ensure that everyone will benefit from the just clean energy transition and that we are all empowered to be a part of and benefit from these solutions"
– Andreas Karelas, RE-volv
|
|
|
|
|
|