View this email in your browser
An update from FactCheck.org 
Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images

Pelosi, Capitol Police and Jan. 6

As a House committee begins investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, Republicans have repeatedly tried to cast blame on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a "breakdown of security" that day.

But their claims have been speculative and devoid of evidence.

FactCheck.org Deputy Managing Editor Rob Farley dissected some of the specific arguments this week. Here's some of what he found:

  • Republican Rep. Jim Banks said that Pelosi, as speaker, “has more control and authority and responsibility over the leadership of the Capitol Police than anyone else in the United States Capitol” and therefore, “is ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security at the Capitol that happened on Jan. 6.” The speaker does not oversee security of the U.S. Capitol. The speaker appoints one member of a four-member board that oversees Capitol security, and who then must be approved by the House.
     
  • House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested Pelosi played a role in denying efforts prior to Jan. 6 to bolster security on the Capitol grounds with members of the National Guard. There is no evidence of that.
     
  • GOP Conference Chair Elise Stefanik said Pelosi “failed to act” on intelligence reports in December about potential security threats and therefore “Nancy Pelosi bears responsibility as speaker of the House for the tragedy that occurred on Jan. 6.” There is no evidence that Pelosi was privy to those intelligence reports.

Read the full story, "Republicans’ Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for Jan. 6."

HOW WE KNOW
Viral posts have falsely claimed that the FDA "revoked" the CDC's PCR test for COVID-19. Others erroneously suggested the test was mistaking influenza for the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. We turned to the CDC notice being referenced and found it was being wildly distorted. Read more.
FEATURED FACT
The delta variant of the novel coronavirus accounted for 82.2% of all cases in the two-week period ending July 17, according to CDC data. That variant helped spur new recommendations for mask-wearing in some parts of the country. We explained the new recommendations.
REPLY ALL

Reader: You people are complete garbage. Understand that there are families whose lives have been destroyed by taking this injection you call a vaccine. You should watch them die, maybe your soul would come back.

FactCheck.org Director Eugene Kiely: We have written multiple times that no vaccine is 100% safe, and that there have been a few very rare adverse events associated with the COVID-19 vaccines. The fact is, however, that the COVID-19 vaccines have saved lives, and the CDC has repeatedly said that the benefits far outweigh the risks. As we recently wrote: According to CDC data, the seven-day rolling average of daily deaths from COVID-19 has declined by about 94% since the vaccines became available in the U.S. The seven-day average of daily deaths was 2,779 on Dec. 14; as of July 11, it was down to 176.

Wrapping Up

Here's what else we've got for you this week:

  • "Flawed Variant Information Fuels Baseless COVID-19 Theory": A conspiracy theory online baselessly suggests that the World Health Organization and other groups preplanned the variants of the novel coronavirus — citing a dubious timeline. But the timeline doesn’t square with the reality of when variants have been identified and designated thus far.
     
  • "A Guide to the CDC’s Updated Mask Recommendations": Citing new data on the delta variant, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended that fully vaccinated people wear face masks indoors in some parts of the country. We explained those recommendations.
     
  • "Posts Baselessly Link COVID-19 Tests to Vaccine Conspiracy Theory": The COVID-19 vaccines currently in use must be administered via injection. But Instagram posts baselessly suggest that Bill Gates and George Soros will use COVID-19 tests to secretly vaccinate people who haven’t yet received the shots. There is no evidence for that conspiracy theory, and scientists say trying to administer a vaccine with a swab would likely not be effective.
     
  • "Viral Posts Misrepresent CDC Announcement on COVID-19 PCR Test": Scientists consider polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, tests a highly reliable tool for diagnosing COVID-19. But social media posts are misrepresenting a recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announcement regarding the eventual discontinuation of its own test, falsely claiming the government has conceded that PCR tests aren’t reliable.
     
  • "Video Twists Advice on Delta Variant and Vaccination": An epidemiologist recommended that people get the COVID-19 vaccine because some evidence suggests an unvaccinated person who gets the delta variant is “twice as likely to require hospital treatment” than someone infected with the alpha variant. But a Facebook video twists that advice to claim that he said vaccinated people would be twice as likely to be hospitalized.
     
  • "Beds for Olympic Athletes Were Not Designed for COVID-19 Concerns": Participants in the 2020 Olympic Games will be subject to many COVID-19 rules. But social media posts and a news report falsely claim athletes will be sleeping on specially made, flimsy “anti-sex beds” to prevent intimacy and COVID-19 infection. The beds were designed before the pandemic and can bear more than 400 pounds, the mattress company said.
Y lo que publicamos en español (English versions are accessible in each story):
Have a question about COVID-19 and the vaccines? Visit our SciCheck page for answers. It's available in Spanish, too.
Donate to Support Our Work
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2021 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
202 S. 36th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.






This email was sent to [email protected]
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania · 202 S 36th St. · Philadelphia, Pa 19104 · USA