From Helen Lucey, EWG <[email protected]>
Subject Update re: your signature on cellphones
Date July 26, 2021 11:03 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Wow, friend.

More than 16,000 supporters have signed EWG’s petition urging the FCC to update regulations on wireless radiation. But I still don’t see your name.
[[link removed]]

Click here to add your name and urge the FCC to protect our health and our kids from radiofrequency radiation!
[[link removed]]

Radiation emitted by wireless devices like cellphones and tablets has been linked to serious health effects, like increased risk of cancer, but the FCC’s regulations are dangerously out of date! EWG’s new peer-reviewed study recommends whole-body exposure limits that are 20 to 40 times lower than the FCC’s for adults, and 200 to 400 times lower for kids!

Please stand up for your health and add your name to our petition today!
[[link removed]]

Thanks for taking action, friend.

Helen Lucey,
Senior Digital Strategist, EWG


---------- Original Message ----------
From: Signature Requested (via EWG.org)
Date: Friday, July 23, 2021
Subject: Cellphones and cancer

Environmental Working Group
---------------------------------------

BREAKING: EWG Calls for Safer Standards on Cellphone Radiation
TAKE ACTION
If you’ve saved your information with FastAction, clicking this button will automatically add your name to this petition.
[[link removed]]

***

EWG just released a new study on cellphone radiation. Here’s what you need to know:

1. The FCC last set standards for cellphone radiation in 1996, before Google, Wi-Fi or the iPhone came into existence!
2. Since then, the World Health Organization has classified radiofrequency radiation exposure as possibly carcinogenic, and recent studies raise concerns about the impact of cellphone radiation on learning, memory, sleep and children’s brain development.
3. Now EWG has released health-protective radiation guidelines that are 20 to 40 times lower than the FCC’s for adults and 200 to 400 times lower for kids!


The bottom line: the FCC’s radiation regulations are dangerously out of date, and we need you to take action today to force the FCC to listen to us. But I don’t see your name:
[[link removed]]

EMAIL: [email protected]
Action status Not yet taken
ADD YOUR NAME: Take action on cellphone radiation!
TAKE ACTION NOW
If you’ve saved your information with FastAction, clicking this button will automatically add your name to this petition.
[[link removed]]

Wireless devices like cellphones and tablets rely on radiofrequency radiation to transmit signals. This type of radiation has been linked to brain cancer, emotional and hyperactivity disorders in kids, and migraines. The World Health Organization categorizes radiofrequency radiation as possibly carcinogenic to humans.

Although more research is essential, it’s clear the FCC needs to take steps to better protect our health and kids from radiofrequency radiation. Can we count on you to add your name to our petition today?

ADD YOUR NAME: Tell the FCC to update regulations on cellphone radiation to protect our health!
[[link removed]]

Thanks for standing with us, friend.

EWG


Contribute
[[link removed]]

UNSUBSCRIBE [[link removed]] | CHANGE OPTIONS [[link removed]]

Remember to add [email protected] to your contact list.

This email was sent to [email protected]. To change your preferred email address, click here. [[link removed]]EWG's mission is to empower people to live healthier lives in a healthier environment. EWG is a non-profit and non-partisan organization. The EWG Action Fund, a separate sister organization of EWG, is a legislative advocacy organization that promotes healthy and sustainable policies.

EWG
1436 U St. NW, Ste 100, Washington, DC 20009
202-667-6982 | [email protected]

Contact Us [[link removed]] | Privacy Policy [[link removed]] | Terms & Conditions [[link removed]] | Copyright © 2021, EWG. All Rights Reserved.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis