From Heritage Media and Public Relations <[email protected]>
Subject Heritage Take: Biden must not return to Obama-era Cuba policies
Date July 22, 2021 11:16 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Here is the Heritage Take on the top issues today.Please reply to this email to arrange an interview.
Biden must not return to Obama-era Cuba policies <[link removed]> – Returning to Obama’s policies won’t bring a better life to the Cuban people or make Cuba a more
responsible government. The Cuban government controls the public and private sector: Any money that flows into the country – from tourism or trade goods – flows through the regime’s fingers, strengthening and empowering its authoritarian leaders. The Trump sanctions may not bring freedom to the Cuban people. But reversing them is a surrender to the world’s illiberal forces — exactly what Biden said he did not want to do. The Biden administration’s best bet is to keep the Trump-era Cuba policy in place as it develops a bipartisan grand strategy focused on achieving political transition in Cuba. Heritage expert: Jim
Carafano <[link removed]>
The Left’s Attempted Election Takeover <[link removed]> – Politicians in Washington are trying to impose a federal takeover of elections and force changes to
state laws that would allow for greater fraud and tampering. You’ve helped sound the alarm about the so-called For the People Act, or HR 1. Now, with opposition mounting, politicians have a new plan they hope to ram through Congress. Their new bill would eliminate important safeguards that protect our elections. They don’t care that your vote could be canceled out by someone else’s illegal one. H.R. 4, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, is named after a civil rights icon. But its intent isn’t to protect a right John Lewis and so many others fought for. In reality, it’s a power grab by politicians who want to manipulate elections to try to stay in office, regardless of what voters want. That’s the stuff of Third World banana republics. Politicians will tell you they’re just trying to stop voter suppression. But they
aren’t. Instead, they want to make it easier for cheaters to commit voter fraud because they think the cheaters will vote for them. It’s that simple.
The Truth About Georgia’s Voting Law <[link removed]> – To call these reforms “the new Jim Crow” as some have done, or an example of “voter suppression,” is simply not true. In fact, it’s so far from the truth, it makes one wonder about the accusers’ motives. But more than anything, it is an insult to the people who really did suffer under restrictive voting laws of the past. But those days are long gone. And the numbers prove it. Georgia has seen record levels of voter registration and turnout in recent elections, including 2020. That includes blacks and Hispanics. And that’s been the trend for a decade. Anybody who wants to vote can vote. Introducing a few safeguards to build confidence that only legal votes are cast and counted just seems to make common sense. So why all the controversy? Heritage expert: Hans von
Spakovsky <[link removed]>
Congress, Don’t Let Liberals Shoehorn Harmful Energy Policies Into Budget and Infrastructure
Bills <[link removed]> – Both policies are suddenly getting a lot of attention in Congress for at least two reasons. First, liberal Democrats are hoping to use the massive “must pass” budget bill and the infrastructure bill as vehicles to pass these politically unpopular policies. But secondly, liberal Democrats need cold hard cash to pay for the trillions in new spending in order to appease moderate Democrats who have the audacity to maintain that
Congress should be able to pay for new spending. Coons and Peters expect their carbon border adjustment fee would bring in $5 billion to $16 billion per year. The incredible thing is, the details of these economy-altering policies are still unknown and haven’t been debated in Congress. Even so, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., defended his hurried deadline to begin voting on the infrastructure package, saying it “is simply about getting the legislative process started here on the Senate floor. It is not a deadline to determine every final little detail of the bill.” But those details matter and should be debated, not rushed. Heritage expert: Katie
Tubb <[link removed]>
<[link removed]>

-
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis