Your weekly source for analysis and insight from experts at the Brennan Center for Justice
The Briefing
Last week, I traveled to Philadelphia to watch President Biden give a passionate defense of voting rights at the National Constitution Center.
He started off reminding Americans that the November election was an extraordinary achievement. Despite the pandemic, it had the highest voter turnout since 1900. The president also lauded the election officials who made it happen while withstanding “unrelenting political attacks, physical threats, intimidation, and pressure.”
But it didn’t take long before Biden’s speech took on a more ominous tone. He told of the Big Lie about a stolen election that continues to poison our politics. He made good use of Brennan Center research describing the ongoing assault on our democracy, noting how 17 states have enacted nearly 30 laws to make it harder to vote. And that legislators across the country, overwhelmingly Republican, have introduced nearly 400 bills to restrict the vote.
The president stressed that this legislative push isn’t just about making it more difficult to cast a ballot. It’s also about determining who gets to count the votes. Instead of independent election administrators, Republicans across the country are pushing state legislation that will give this sacred responsibility to partisan legislatures and other untrustworthy actors.
Biden also noted that we can’t rely on the Supreme Court to protect voting rights either. If it wasn’t clear before, it became painfully obvious in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee. The case involved Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, under which people could challenge voting laws and practices that produced discriminatory results regardless of whether that was the intent.
But after the conservative majority’s ruling, courts might look past voting laws and practices that impose disparate burdens on voters of color so long as the state provides other ways to vote. For instance, if state legislators eliminate early voting on Sundays, a day Black churches drive their worshippers to the polls, they may be able to escape liability if voters have other options for casting their ballots. As Justice Elena Kagan noted in her dissent, such “inconveniences” can add up to vote suppression.
As my colleague Sean Morales-Doyle told Congress on Friday, this will undermine free and fair elections.
“The reality is that state legislatures are not hacking, but slicing away at voting rights from every angle,” he testified. “They shave away access to mail voting, they cut back on in-person voting, they trim voters from the rolls through faulty purges. While any one slice might appear minor, the end result is death by a thousand cuts.”
Both Biden and Morales-Doyle identified the legislative solutions to the threats we face. By passing the For the People Act, Congress would override many of the restrictive state laws. By passing the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, Congress can reactivate the powerful preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. And in light of Brnovich, Congress must also strengthen Section 2 in order to fully restore the Voting Rights Act to its former glory.
“Make no mistake — bullies and merchants of fear and peddlers of lies are threatening the very foundation of our country,” Biden said near the end of his speech. Now is the time for concerted legislative action led by the White House. Without the For the People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, millions of voters across America — many of them people of color — are vulnerable to having their voices silenced.

 
Democracy
Appeals Court Rules Against Indiana Voter Purge Law
In a win for voting rights Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit found that an Indiana voter purge law violates the federal “Motor Voter” registration law. The Brennan Center filed the lawsuit challenging the state policy on behalf of the Indiana NAACP and the League of Women Voters of Indiana, arguing that it lacks safeguards to prevent the removal of eligible voters. “A person’s vote is her voice,” said Eliza Sweren-Becker. “The state of Indiana should not be taking shortcuts around voters’ rights.” // Read More
Democracy Reform Can Help Fight Climate Change
All too often, politics block effective federal action to address the climate crisis. Wealthy individuals and corporations hold undue sway over members of Congress, and they have often spent aggressively to kill climate change legislation. And communities of color that are having their political voices muffled by voter suppression and gerrymandering are also often the most likely to suffer from unjust environmental policies. Reforms to strengthen our democracy, like the campaign finance and voting rights provisions in the For the People Act, can ensure that elected officials truly represent everyone’s interests. // Read More

 
Constitution
The President’s Extraordinary Sanctions Powers
The vast majority of the emergencies declared by presidents in recent decades rely on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which can be used against both nations and individuals. Multiple presidents have used the law’s powers improperly, with Trump taking abuses to the next level. Andrew Boyle details reforms that would make it easier for Congress to terminate sanctions it disagrees with. Other proposed changes include adding due process protections for individuals or organizations targeted by narrow sanctions and expanding access to humanitarian goods under broad-based sanctions that harm innocent civilians. // Read More

 
Justice
Spurring States to End Mass Incarceration
Federal funding schemes have long encouraged states to focus their resources on law enforcement interventions to deal with social problems, resulting in ever more people locked up for ever longer periods of time. Lauren-Brooke Eisen and Hernandez Stroud explain that a primary way to undo this is to enact the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act, under which federal grants are sent only to states that reduce incarceration. “America’s criminal legal system is rooted in the nation’s history of legalized slavery and racial oppression,” they write. “Criminal legal reform efforts must engage directly with this sordid lineage to unmoor the inequitable impacts and outcomes of our current system of ‘justice.’” // Read More

 
News
  • Lauren-Brooke Eisen on bail reform // Fox5 NY
  • Michael Li on the benefits of independent redistricting commissions // Center for Public Integrity
  • Faiza Patel and Mary Pat Dwyer on Facebook's rules for dangerous individuals and organizations // Just Security
The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that works to reform, revitalize – and when necessary defend – our country’s systems of democracy and justice.

 
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law
120 Broadway, Suite 1750
New York, NY 10271
T 646 292 8310
F 212 463 7308
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences.
Want to stop receiving these emails?
Click here to unsubscribe.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Website