** NRECA runs misleading pro-coal ads to sway Illinois lawmakers ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
By Matt Kasper on Jul 15, 2021 10:24 am
As negotiations continue over a climate and energy bill in Illinois, misleading online advertisements from a group called “Voices for Cooperative Power” have appeared. The ads running in Illinois political ([link removed]) media ([link removed]) outlets claim that legislators are on the verge of closing the Prairie State Energy Campus, a “state-of-the-art coal plant” that has “$1 billion of emissions controls.” While state lawmakers are working on how to equitably phase out coal and gas power plants in the state, the advertisements imply that the Prairie State Energy Campus should remain open because it is “highly efficient” and “came online during the Obama-Biden Administration.”
In truth, the $5 billion 1,600 MW coal plant located in Marissa, IL – about 50 miles from St. Louis – emits more ([link removed]) carbon dioxide, methane, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides than any other power plant in the state. These pollutants ([link removed]) are greenhouse gases and contribute to global warming while causing severe health and environmental problems. Prairie State was also the eighth largest ([link removed]) carbon polluter among power plants in the United States in 2019, when it emitted 13,859,542 metric tons of carbon dioxide.
Screenshot from RMI report authored by Kevin Brehm, Laurie Stone, David Posner, and Uday Varadarajan, “Transition Opportunities for Prairie State Energy Campus,” 2021.
Voices for Cooperative Power, which is behind the online advertisements, is a new advocacy effort from the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA) – the trade association for electric cooperatives. NRECA launched Voices for Cooperative Power earlier this year. The website, which was registered ([link removed]) on February 24, 2021 and went live ([link removed]) on May 6, 2021, features NRECA policy priorities along with images of electric cooperative members – though some are simply stock ([link removed]) images ([link removed]) available for purchase. The banner image used on the main page of the Voices for Cooperative Power website is a stock photo available
([link removed]) at Shutterstock, titled “Group of Diversity People Teamwork Together.” Another image on the main page of the website is also a stock image, titled ([link removed]) “Friendly female colleagues having good relationships, pleasant conversation at workplace during coffee break, smiling young woman listen talkative coworker, discussing new project, talking in office.”
The advocacy effort replaces NRECA’s “Our Energy, Our Future ([link removed]) ” program, which campaigned against President Obama’s Clean Power Plan as well as other EPA ([link removed]) proposed rules. The Voices for Cooperative Power Twitter handle ([link removed]) was renamed from the original “Our Energy, Our Future” account, which explains the account start date of 2009, and older posts frequently link to that effort’s now-deleted website and other social media channels.
Screenshot from Wayback Machine capture of www.ourenergy.coop on September 23, 2012 ([link removed])
Voices for Cooperative Power describes itself ([link removed]) as a “network of electric co-op members working together to influence elected officials who are making energy policy decisions that impact our co-ops and, by extension, our way of life.” NRECA noted ([link removed]) in a blog post that it launched the advocacy effort to “modernize and improve efforts to influence Congress and the White House.” Louis Finkel, NRECA’s senior vice president of government relations, said, “We’re connecting cooperative communities through the use of social media to have a thoughtful and sustained dialogue about issues of importance to them and to the future of their cooperatives.”
In addition to running misleading ads in Illinois, the website emphasizes electric cooperatives’ efforts to reduce emissions, including ([link removed]) a deceptive claim that “nearly two-thirds of [cooperative] power comes from low- or no-emission sources.” NRECA’s figure appears to include fossil gas plants as a “low- or no-emission source.” Gas typically emits half the carbon of coal when burned, but that’s still far from no emissions, and these plants rely on a supply chain of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, prone to leaking ([link removed]) .
Electric cooperatives also remain more reliant on coal than the US electricity sector as a whole. Coal accounted for 32% of electric cooperative retail sales in 2019, according to an NRECA fact sheet ([link removed]) , with gas increasing to 32% as well that year; fossil fueled power plants account for nearly two-thirds of the industry’s power supply.
** Owners of Prairie State Energy Campus work to scuttle clean energy and climate bill despite benefit to their customers
------------------------------------------------------------
The Illinois legislative session ended last month without the passage of a bill that could have been the nation’s most comprehensive and equitable climate and energy plan. But 52 legislators co-signed a letter ([link removed]) to Governor Pritzker saying that they supported keeping the Prairie State Energy Campus online past a 2035 coal-phase out target. J.C. Kibbey, a clean energy advocate in Illinois for the Natural Resources Defense Council, explained to Midwest Energy News ([link removed]) that the backers of the Prairie State coal plant set up the “11th hour” roadblock. Pritzker, however, said ([link removed]) that he would have vetoed a bill that exempted the coal plant. The Senate adjourned ([link removed]) without
taking action, and a special two-day session also did not result in legislation. After the session ended, WCIA’s Mark Maxwell reported ([link removed]) Senate President Don Harmon’s chief of staff previously worked ([link removed]) at a lobbying firm that Prairie State hired. Sen. Harmon told WBEZ ([link removed]) that the relationship “does not factor in at all” during the negotiations on the final bill.
The backers of Prairie State have harmed not just communities in Illinois but customers throughout the region. In 2007, Peabody Energy, American Municipal Power, and the plant’s other promoters persuaded ([link removed]) more than 200 communities in eight states ([link removed]) to sign long-term contracts to buy power from the proposed coal plant. Peabody, which was at the time the world’s largest private-sector coal company, owns the mine ([link removed]) next to the plant’s site.
Despite promises of cheap power, the plant’s construction costs ballooned to a $5 billion total price tag. Cheap gas and renewable projects have also caused customers of Prairie State to pay more than they would have paid for the same energy and capacity from the wholesale market.
Peabody gradually reduced its ownership interest ([link removed]) in the power plant to 5% and ultimately sold that remaining stake ([link removed]) in 2016 to Wabash Valley Power Association, an Indiana-based generation and transmission association.
A February 2021 analysis from Rocky Mountain Institute ([link removed]) , an independent nonprofit, found that closing Prairie State would most likely save customers money. “Between now and 2030, market prices for energy are expected to remain low, and the price of energy and services from wind, solar, and battery storage are expected to decline. By 2030, closing Prairie State Energy Campus and replacing it with a clean energy portfolio that includes wind, solar, battery storage, demand flexibility, and energy efficiency is expected to save ratepayers money without sacrificing reliability.”
Featured image: a screenshot of the Voices for Electric Cooperative website ([link removed]) .
The post NRECA runs misleading pro-coal ads to sway Illinois lawmakers ([link removed]) appeared first on Energy and Policy Institute ([link removed]) .
Read in browser » ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]
** Recent Articles:
------------------------------------------------------------
** Duke Energy given preferential treatment to shape study of HB 951 by North Carolina Utilities Commission Public Staff, records show ([link removed])
** Four major Ohio utilities shut off customers’ electricity 200,000 times during COVID-19 pandemic ([link removed])
** North Carolina HB 951 could mean windfall for Duke, large rate increases for customers ([link removed])
** Mike DeWine met with Larry Householder early on in racketeering conspiracy ([link removed])
** Colorado regulators reject coal front group’s attempt to intervene in Xcel Energy resource plan ([link removed]
============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2021 Energy and Policy Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website via our Contact Us page.
Our mailing address is:
Energy and Policy Institute
P.O. Box 170399
San Francisco, CA 94117
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
