No images? Click here [link removed]

Welcome to The Corner. In this issue, we take a closer look at the White House’s executive order on competition, Amazon’s far-reaching surveillance practices, building resilient food supply chains, and the systemic risks of cryptocurrency.

Biden Revolutionizes Fight to Rebuild Democracy and Break Monopoly

Last Friday, President Joe Biden ordered his administration to use its regulatory powers to combat monopolization across the whole U.S. economy. Biden’s executive [[link removed]] order [[link removed]] was the most important move against monopoly since the New Deal, due to its focus on protecting “democracy,” “liberty,” and the “free press” and its harsh denunciation of neoliberal competition philosophy. The order was especially sweet for Open Markets. As you know, we’ve led the fight against monopoly since first sounding the alarm more than a decade ago. But even today — when we have thousands of allies — Open Markets remains unique in always focusing foremost on the fight to control the language and ideas we use to understand power and purpose in our political economy. Our prime goal, in many ways, was to get a president to speak words precisely like those Biden spoke. The order was based largely on research, reporting, testimony, advocacy, and strategies [[link removed]]published by Open Markets, and it built on our groundbreaking work on Big Tech, Big Ag, Big Pharma, Big Hospitals, and the exploitation and manipulation of working people. In many ways, the EO reads as a testament to the work of Phillip Longman, Sally Hubbard, Sandeep Vaheesan, Alexis Goldstein, Claire Kelloway — and every Open Markets’ team member and alum — and of key allies like the Washington Monthly. The breadth of the directive made very clear how long a fight still lies ahead, but this executive order was our biggest victory yet. Read the order here [[link removed]]; view Biden’s speech here [[link removed]]; read our statement here [[link removed]].

Open Markets Releases Report Detailing Amazon’s Extensive Surveillance of Customers and Competitors

Open Markets policy analyst Daniel Hanley [[link removed]] authored a new report Wednesday examining the full breadth of Amazon’s consumer and competitor surveillance. The report, Eyes [[link removed]] Everywhere: Amazon’s Surveillance Infrastructure and Revitalizing a Fair Marketplace [[link removed]], is a sequel to Open Markets’ first report [[link removed]] on Amazon released in September 2020 examining the corporation's brutal worker surveillance practices. The report explores how Amazon uses its monopoly power to impose coercive and broad contracts that grant it the right to harvest as much data as possible from customers. For example, Amazon’s Marketplace e-commerce site tracks every action a user takes, collecting upward of 2,000 data points from a single purchase. Amazon also vigorously tracks every action of third-party businesses that independently sell their products on Amazon’s site. While highly dependent on Amazon, these third parties are also Amazon’s competitors as the corporation also sells products on its own site in direct competition with its third-party businesses. The report examines how Amazon uses the data from its surveillance to extend and fortify its monopoly power. Specifically, we detail how the corporation uses the data to copy competitor products, boost its own products over those of rivals, and to manipulate customers and competitors. Our report proposes five solutions that would fundamentally restructure Amazon’s operations and dismantle its surveillance infrastructure.

The full report is available here [[link removed]]. Open Markets’ statement on the release of the report can be read here [[link removed]].

Goldstein Testifies Before House About Systemic Risks in Cryptocurrency Markets

On June 30, Open Markets’ Financial Policy Director Alexis Goldstein testified at a hearing on the risks of cryptocurrencies before the House Financial Services Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee. Her testimony was mentioned in Law360 [[link removed]], ThinkAdvisor [[link removed]], and Truthout [[link removed]], among others. In her presentation, Goldstein spoke of gaps in consumer and investor protections, growing concentration and centralization, and how a lack of transparency in the market may interfere with regulators’ ability to manage any emerging systemic risks. Goldstein highlighted the potential for spillover effects to the broader economy, as under-regulated hedge funds that do business with too-big-to-fail banks move into cryptocurrency. In her written testimony, Goldstein noted a recent survey that showed North American funds expect to have over 10% average exposure to cryptocurrency by 2026. Such a presence by hedge funds in crypto “may produce dire risks to the financial system such as future crises, as sharp swings in the volatility cryptocurrency markets could lead to forced liquidations of other assets,” Goldstein wrote. Read Goldstein’s full written testimony here [[link removed]]. View the hearing here [[link removed]].

Open Markets’ Report Underscores Importance of Resilient Food Systems

Last week, Open Markets released a report detailing how the Department of Agriculture can promote more resilient food supply chains. The report was based on an official comment Open Markets filed with the USDA, as part of the agency’s effort to learn from massive COVID-19 disruptions to U.S. food systems. Staff members Claire Kelloway, Alex Spring, and Garphil Julien contributed writing and research, and allies Friends of the Earth and Food & Water Watch co-signed our comment. In the report, Open Markets argues that corporate consolidation and Wall Street-driven austerity make for especially fragile food systems, as a shrinking handful of corporate decision-makers prioritize short-term returns for shareholders over worker safety, diversity, and capacity building. “A truly resilient food system will promote food sovereignty, allowing all communities to have a say in what they eat and how its produced, including greater opportunities for all communities to directly participate in their own food production and distribution,” the comment says. To this end, Open Markets recommends policies that support more regional and cooperatively run food businesses. This includes strengthening fair competition rules in the livestock industry, rebuilding USDA’s cooperatives department, and prioritizing community-focused organizations in procurement contracts, among other actions.

See Open Markets’ report based on this comment, “ Building [[link removed]] Food Systems Resiliency Through Different Business Scales and Forms [[link removed]],” for more.

Ohio State AG Seeks to Declare Google a Common Carrier, After Open Markets Testimony

The attorney general of Ohio, Dave Yost, recently asked an Ohio court to declare Google to be a public utility, in order to impose common carrier rules on the corporation. “When you own the railroad or the electric company or the cellphone tower, you have to treat everyone the same and give everybody access,” Yost wrote in a statement. The action appears to be based largely on Open Markets testimony [[link removed]] delivered before Yost and his team, along with the Judiciary Committee of the Ohio Senate, in October 2019. Executive Director Barry Lynn said in his testimony: “What allowed these three corporations to build such powerful and effective manipulation machines was the absence of common carrier rules. The liberty to price what each seller must pay for basic services, and what each end buyer must pay for the good or service being sold, is what allows Google, Facebook, and Amazon to individually target and exploit each seller and buyer.” ( The [[link removed]] [[link removed]] New York Times [[link removed]])

🔊 ANTI-MONOPOLY RISING:

This week, French antitrust regulators fined Google $593 million after finding that the company’s negotiation with news publishers to display their content was not in “good faith.” Early last year, Google was ordered by the watchdog, under a new European Union digital copyright law, to pay news publishers for showcasing their content on Google News. According to publishers, Google did not provide them with payment information and attempted to circumvent the payment process by introducing a new product called News Showcase, which would have excluded publishers from getting income from search results. ( TechCrunch [[link removed]])

Last week, attorneys general from 36 states and Washington D.C. filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google, alleging the abuse of market power over developers of mobile apps through the Google Play store. The lawsuit claims that Google’s 30% commission for apps through its Play platform is anti-competitive. Google illegally exercises its market power by cutting off alternate channels that app developers can use to sell their products, according to the lawsuit. The plaintiffs say Google, which distributes 90% of Android apps in the U.S., has offered incentives to and stopped efforts by other app stores to distribute Android apps. ( CNBC [[link removed]])

This week, Dominion Energy announced that it would terminate a deal involving the sale of its Questar Pipelines business to Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) began to scrutinize the deal. In a statement by the FTC, the deal would have stopped competition between Questar and Berkshire’s Kern River Pipeline in the Rocky Mountain area that provides energy to Central Utah. ( Bloomberg [[link removed]])

📝 WHAT WE'VE BEEN UP TO:

Open Markets Institute was extensively cited by Amazon and Facebook in the corporations’ respective petitions to evade strict antitrust enforcement by requesting that FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan recuse herself from antitrust investigations against them. The corporations both acknowledge Khan’s academic scholarship at Open Markets, and while the corporations mention Khan’s academic scholarship at Open Markets as attempts to prove her biases, the corporations, in turn, demonstrate Open Markets’ scopious impacts and achievements. From Amazon’s petition [[link removed]]: “Not only did Open Markets ‘spearhead’ this anti-Facebook group while Chair Khan was the Director of Legal Policy, Open Markets also submitted a letter to the Commission in November 2017 on ‘Facebook’s dominance in social networking and online advertising.’” From Facebook’s petition [[link removed]]: “The Majority Staff Report made a wide range of specific accusations and legal conclusions against Amazon that built on Chair Khan’s original advocacy at Open Markets and her academic publications.”Reporting on the requests for recusal that cited Open Markets included: The Washington Post [[link removed]], Time Magazine [[link removed]], CNBC [[link removed]], Yahoo! Finance [[link removed]], Los Angeles Times [[link removed]], Politico [[link removed]], Variety [[link removed]], Axios [[link removed]], Bloomberg Law [[link removed]], Law 360 [[link removed]], Vice [[link removed]], Barron’s [[link removed]], Reuters [[link removed]], The Boston Globe [[link removed]], The Hill [[link removed]], The Verge [[link removed]], Fox Business [[link removed]], Fortune [[link removed]], Al Jazeera [[link removed]], Media Post [[link removed]], The Wrap [[link removed]] and Videoweek [[link removed]].

Sandeep Vaheesan published a piece in Slate Magazine [[link removed]] about how the FTC can still go after Facebook despite losing its recent antitrust complaint against the social network. “Despite the loss ... [The FTC] could file an administrative complaint and litigate the case in house at the FTC, instead of in federal court.”

Daniel Hanley spoke with Bloomberg Law [[link removed]] about how the FTC can revive its antitrust case against Facebook. “’What the FTC needs to do is come up with a much more specific methodology on what market Facebook is actually in,’ said Daniel Hanley, an analyst at Open Markets Institute, an anti-monopoly organization in Washington. ‘There’s a million ways to cut this, and the agency has a mountain of evidence to draw from to draw the appropriate market.’” The story also ran in Bloomberg [[link removed]].

Barry Lynn spoke at an economics conference [[link removed]] sponsored by the Circle des Economistes of France in Aix en Provence, the first major conference in France since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lynn addressed the threats to human liberty and democracy posed by Google, Facebook, and Amazon, and the growing threat posed by Chinese control over key supply chains. Other speakers at the conference included European Central Bank chief Christine Lagarde, French Minister of Economy and Finance Bruno Le Maire, and German Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy Peter Altmaier.

Sally Hubbard was interviewed by Vox [[link removed]] about how Big Business exploits small business and what needs to be done about it: “It’s not just antitrust, it’s not just breaking them up, but it’s rules like nondiscrimination and neutrality rules,” Hubbard said.

Daniel Hanley authored a piece in ProMarket [[link removed]] about the history and harms of exclusive deals by dominant firms, and the legal mechanisms available to ban them. “Left unchecked, dominant firms will continue to use exclusive deals to entrench their market position, supplant competition, and coerce smaller firms into working exclusively with them. There are legal mechanisms available to restrict and prohibit these legal instruments. History shows that the law can be used to ban these agreements. The FTC can take action to do so now.” Real Clear Markets [[link removed]] also ran the article.

Garphil Julien wrote a piece for The Washington Monthly [[link removed]] about how the assassination of Haitian President Jovenal Moïse highlights the nation’s monopoly-dominated economy. “If Washington wants to avoid further political instability in Haiti and other countries, it should send ideas as well as aid. Promoting economic democracy through an anti-monopoly policy and conditioning at least some economic aid on anti-monopoly reform would be an essential first step.”

Sandeep Vaheesan testified [[link removed]] at a D.C. Council Committee hearing on non-competes, urging the District not to carve out additional workers and instead amend the law to extend its protection to all workers in the District: “Non-compete clauses are classic contracts of adhesion presented to workers by employers on a take it-or-leave it basis.”

Barry Lynn was interviewed by NPR [[link removed]] about the growing anti-monopoly movement. "'This is a revolutionary moment,’ said Barry Lynn, the director of the Open Markets Institute, a left-leaning think tank that has helped lead the charge for a new era of trust-busting. ‘Now we're waking up to the fact that we live in a world in which the monopolists govern, and unless we actually use what tools we have right now, it's kind of all over. Our democracy is over, it's done with.’" He was also featured in a similar piece by Time Magazine [[link removed]].

Johnny Ryan and his group, The Irish Council for Civil Liberties, continued to receive coverage on their privacy lawsuit against IAB Tech Lab for allegedly breaching EU privacy rules. “The case brought by Johnny Ryan centres on the data shared between ad brokers and other firms while ad space is being auctioned as a site loads.” Coverage included: DataProtection.news [[link removed]], GRC World Forums [[link removed]], and Media Street [[link removed]].

Sandeep Vaheesan was quoted in The Washington Post [[link removed]] commenting on the importance of the FTC vote to revoke a policy that constrained its role in regulating unfair methods of competition. “We want companies to compete by making better products, investing in new equipment and tech — not purely relying on their financial advantages to capture market share.”

Barry Lynn was quoted in Politico [[link removed]] commenting on the pros of Biden’s competition policy executive order. “’This is far better than what most people expected,’ Barry Lynn, executive director of the Open Markets Institute in Washington and one of the leading anti-monopoly intellectuals, told West Wing Playbook.” Lynn’s statement [[link removed]] about the executive order was also quoted in The Economist [[link removed]], Truthout [[link removed]], The Financial Times [[link removed]], Common Dreams [[link removed]], Mashable [[link removed]], Bloomberg Law [[link removed]], and JD Supra [[link removed]].

Alexis Goldstein was featured on the “ By [[link removed]] Any Means Necessary [[link removed]]” podcast discussing the economic crisis. “In the first segment, Sean and Jacquie are joined by joined by Alexis Goldstein, former Wall Street professional turned financial reform advocate, to discuss the historic 9.5% contraction of US GDP in just three months, whether the GOP plan for the next relief package will bring any actual relief to those who need it most, and the economic implications going forward if little or nothing is done to address the public health or economic crisis.”

Nikki Usher was interviewed by the Illinois News Bureau [[link removed]] about her new book, News for the Rich, White, and Blue: How Place and Power Distort American Journalism [[link removed]]: “It is a well-accepted premise that local journalism is inherently good for democracy, and that it is something that we absolutely need for democratic life to function and flourish,” Usher said. “But, as newspapers continue to rely on subscription revenue, they need to hold the interest of those willing and able to pay for news. This leads to journalism that perpetuates an elite democracy, where news is about elites for elites.” Usher’s book was also mentioned in CNN [[link removed]], Columbia Journalism Review [[link removed]], EurekAlert! [[link removed]], IndiaEducationDiary [[link removed]], and ABC10 [[link removed]].

Barry Lynn was interviewed by America Magazine [[link removed]] commenting on Facebook’s monopoly power. ‘“Facebook talks about building community,’ said Barry Lynn, executive director of the Open Markets Institute. ‘But really what they do is extract from community.’”

Daniel Hanley was quoted in The Tennessee Tribune [[link removed]] explaining the impacts of harmful vertical mergers. “Dominant firms can use vertical mergers to foreclose competitors from accessing essential inputs, distributors, or customers,” Hanley said. “This lack of access could lead to competitors exiting the marketplace, or shutting down their operations entirely, or deter future competitors from entering the market for no reason other than the fact that a firm increased its market power from a merger.”

Phillip Longman was mentioned in The Washington Monthly [[link removed]] for his 1985 prediction about the politics around the generational divide. “Phil was right that a generational split would define American politics. It just didn’t turn out to be a fight over Medicare and Social Security benefits. It turned out to be a fight about everything else.”

Open Markets’ concentration report was cited in The Wall Street Journal [[link removed]]in an article about the Biden administration's recent executive order on competition policy. “In mobile-phone services, four firms control 98% of market share; in airlines, four firms control 76% of the market; in hearing aids, four firms control 84% of the market; in eyeglasses, three firms have a 61% share; in diapers, two firms have a 64% share; in dialysis, two firms have a 92% share, according to Open Markets.”

Barry Lynn was featured on KCRW [[link removed]] speaking about Amazon’s harmful surveillance. “They're using the services that they provide to other companies that are storing their data online to basically spy on those companies. That's a problem.” Lynn says. “Amazon uses its power to favor certain companies over other companies in a rather arbitrary way. And that's actually not how a marketplace is supposed to work.”

Open Markets’ FTC petition to ban non-compete clauses was mentioned in The Huffington Post [[link removed]]. “A host of progressive and labor groups, led by the Open Markets Institute think tank, have been calling on the FTC to ban the clauses [[link removed]] through the rule-making process.”

We appreciate your readership. Please consider making a contribution to support the continued publication of this newsletter.

DONATE [[link removed]] 📈 VITAL STAT: 72

The number of initiatives included in the “ Executive [[link removed] Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy] Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy [[link removed] Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy]” signed by President Joe Biden last week.

📚 WHAT WE'RE READING: “ How the Postal Service Can Help Local Retailers Beat Amazon [[link removed]]” (Eric Cortellessa, Washington Monthly): Cortellessa explains how the U.S. Postal Service can be expanded to support the development of local businesses by being able to form agreements that lower shipping costs for consumers.

NIKKI USHER'S

NEW BOOK

News for the Rich, White, and Blue: How Place and Power Distort American Journalism

Nikki Usher, a senior fellow at Open Markets Institute’s Center for Journalism & Liberty [[link removed]], has released her third book, News for the Rich, White, and Blue: How Place and Power Distort American Journalism [[link removed]]. In her latest work, Usher offers a frank examination of the inequalities driving not just America’s journalism crisis but also certain portions of the movement to save it.

“We need to radically rethink the core functions of journalism, leverage expertise, and consider how to take the best of what the newspaper ethos of journalism can offer to places that have lost geographically specific news, “ says Usher, an associate professor at the University of Illinois-Champaign. “The news that powers democracy can be more inclusive.”

Usher is also the author of Making News at The New York Times (2014) and Interactive Journalism: Hackers, Data, and Code (2016).

News for the Rich, White, and Blue, published by Columbia University Press, is available as a hardback, paperback and e-book. You can order your copy here [[link removed]].

🔎 TIPS? COMMENTS? SUGGESTIONS?

We would love to hear from you—just reply to this e-mail and drop us a line. Give us your feedback, alert us to competition policy news, or let us know your favorite story from this issue.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER [[link removed]] DONATE [[link removed]] Share [link removed] Tweet [link removed] Share [[link removed]] Forward [link removed]

Open Markets Institute

655 15th St NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC xxxxxx

We thought you'd like to be in the know about competition policy news. Liked what you read? Please forward to a friend or colleague.

Written and edited by: Barry C. Lynn, LaRonda Peterson, Alexis Goldstein, Jackie Filson, Claire Kelloway, Daniel A. Hanley, Garphil Julien, and Ezmeralda Makhamreh.

Preferences [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed]