View this email in your browser

 

**JULY 6, 2021**

Meyerson on TAP

California's Recalls and Voters Themselves

Some years ago, the

**Los Angeles Times**went Safire Fishing.

The above term refers to the

**New York Times**op-ed columnist William Safire, whom, in 1973, the

**Times**hired away from the Nixon administration, where he'd been a
speechwriter for Nixon and his vice president, Spiro Agnew. Safire was
certainly a lively writer, but his hiring was largely the result of the
generally liberal

**Times**deciding it needed one conservative columnist to provide
ideological or, at least, political balance, particularly since Nixon
had just carried 49 states in his 1972 re-election. Lively writer though
he may have been, Safire also contributed greatly to the fake news that
made the case for the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, penning repeated
columns in which he reported on Saddam Hussein's ties to al-Qaeda,
none of which actually existed.

The Gray Lady isn't the only paper, of course, that's made a
Safiresque hire for reasons of political balance. More than a decade
ago, the

**L.A. Times**, which boasted excellent liberal editorial pages under
the direction of Nick Goldberg and Sue Horton, hired Jonah Goldberg (no
relation to Nick), a longtime

**National Review**editor whose right-wing polemics were occasionally
semi-offset by his wit, to be its own Safire.

Like many neocons, Goldberg has been a Never Trumper, which led to his
departure from

**National Review**. But honorable right-wingers, like honorable
left-wingers but usually more so, can still write excruciatingly silly
stuff, and this week's installment of his regular Tuesday

**Times**column

fits that description to a T. In it, Goldberg reflects on the impending
(September 14) recall election of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. He's
against recalls in principle, he writes, but that of Newsom is at least
giving him pause.

Why the pause? Because, Goldberg writes, "California's
problems-homelessness, crime, tax-flight, etc.-are largely the
result of years of one-party [i.e., Democratic] rule." It's
certainly true that Democrats have won every statewide election since
2006, and hold three-quarters of the seats in each house of the state
legislature and 42 of the state's 53 U.S. House districts. Goldberg
still isn't entirely sold on the recall's merits, but as an antidote
to one-party rule, he writes, "having the voters themselves serve as a
counterweight to one party rule seems preferable."

At the necessary risk of stating the obvious, however, homelessness and
crime are rising everywhere, including states where Republicans govern,
and it's the progressives in the California legislature who have put
forth the only plausible affordable-housing proposals. Nor is there any
evidence that taxes are causing Californians to flee; to the extent that
there are relocations, most are in-state and almost all are the result
of housing costs, not tax rates.

As for the case that the recall lets "voters themselves" reject
Newsom, I have it on good authority that it was voters themselves who
elected Newsom governor in 2018, with 62 percent of the vote, in an
election in which millions more Californians voted than will vote in
this September's recall (which Newsom will surely survive). Goldberg
writes that his affinity for direct democracy is rooted in the outcome
of several California ballot measures in 2020, which included the
successful Uber- and Lyft-backed proposition to overturn a new law that
would have required the companies to treat their drivers as employees,
and thereby covered by minimum-wage laws and the like. The problem with
this kind of "direct democracy" is that success at the ballot box is
often directly determined by money. Uber, Lyft, and their ilk dropped a
cool $200 million on their campaign, which led many Yes voters
erroneously to think they were voting to raise the drivers' incomes.

Thing is, it's the voters themselves who've made California an
overwhelmingly Democratic state. Neither a recall nor a recount will
change that.

~ HAROLD MEYERSON

Follow Harold Meyerson on Twitter

[link removed]

Meet the Consulting Firm That's Staffing the Biden Administration

WestExec represented major corporations throughout the Trump years. Now
it's in the White House. BY JONATHAN GUYER

The Smallest Regulations Can Make a Big Difference

An obscure Consumer Financial Protection Bureau guidance will protect
people from financial scams. It shows how much executive branch action
matters. BY DAVID DAYEN

The Council Implementing New York's Climate Law Is Stacked With
Industry Executives

A top energy executive, whose firm is designing pro-gas talking points,
has a seat at the table charting the state's path to decarbonization.
BY LEE HARRIS

The Government Provided Child Care in World War II. We Need It Again.

Women worked then, women work now. It's time for national child
care-permanently. BY ROSA DELAURO

To receive this newsletter directly in your inbox, click here to
subscribe. 

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

YOUR TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM


Copyright (c) 2021 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.
_________________

Sent to [email protected]

Unsubscribe:
[link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States