Constitutional Lawyers Call Trump's First Amendment Defense Against Jan. 6 Lawsuits 'Spurious'
By Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post
July 10, 2021
Former president Donald Trump's claim that the First Amendment shields his conduct leading up to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot is legally "spurious" and should be rejected as a federal court considers lawsuits that allege he incited the violence, four prominent First Amendment lawyers and scholars argued Thursday.
Targeting a key defense raised by lawyers for Trump and co-defendants including Rudolph W. Giuliani and Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), the legal experts said that courts have long recognized that speech central to a crime — such as the political intimidation of voters, lawmakers and government officials — is barred and not protected by the Constitution.
In a 23-page proposed friend-of-the-court brief filed Thursday in a case brought by members of Congress and Capitol police, the legal scholars argued that courts must strike a balance between protecting freedom of political speech and preventing political intimidation.
Order Klayman’s It Takes a Revolution: Forget the Scandal Industry!
How to wage a peaceful revolution to restore rule of law, ethics, and morality to the nation
With a title that satirically mocks Hillary Clinton, this book details how our executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government have become thoroughly corrupt and failed the citizenry. This work is a call to arms during these times of crises, when government corruption has hit a “cancerous state.” The overriding message is that Americans should turn off cable news, get up off of the couch, and join the second American Revolution to restore the greatness of our nation in these perilous times.
Support Our Cause and Join Our Fight!
Your help is urgently needed!
Freedom Watch Inc.
2020 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Suite 345
Washington, DC 20006