Our Look at the Origin of the Coronavirus
In the early days of the pandemic, social media lit up with wild conspiracy theories about the origin of SARS-CoV-2. It wasn’t surprising. Little was known about the novel coronavirus and, as we all know, nature abhors a vacuum.
In the first two months of 2020, we debunked false claims that the coronavirus was stolen from a lab in Canada and then weaponized by China, and we squashed suggestions that it was created by a Harvard professor and two Chinese students who were arrested in unrelated cases. We also refuted the false claim that the coronavirus contains HIV "insertions" that prove it was "man-made."
We repeatedly wrote that there was no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was created by the Chinese.
Over time, a consensus began to emerge among scientists who study coronaviruses: SARS-CoV-2 was likely a naturally occurring virus that originated in bats, infected another animal or animals and then jumped to humans—a transmission known as "zoonotic transfer."
But following less-than-definitive findings about the origin released by the World Health Organization, a group of 18 scientists published a letter in the journal Science calling for "more investigation" and noting that accidental lab release and a natural zoonotic spillover "both remain viable." Some journalists also argued anew that the virus may have been created at the Wuhan Institute of Virology or accidentally escaped from the lab.
This prompted us to take another look at what is known—and unknown—about how SARS-CoV-2 originated.
The result is a detailed and authoritative piece written by our science editor, Jessica McDonald, who has a Ph.D. in immunology from Yale University.
"Despite the increased media attention, little has changed on the ground," Jessica writes. "There still is no credible evidence that the virus came from a lab in Wuhan, China, where the pandemic began. At the same time, a natural spillover from an animal to a human—the scenario widely viewed as most likely—has not yet been proven."
While many scientists "remain open to a lab escape of a natural virus ... fewer entertain the notion that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered," she writes. "While this cannot be ruled out entirely, multiple coronavirus experts view this as implausible."
We’ve updated past stories that we have written about the origin of the coronavirus to refer readers to Jessica’s latest story—an important piece that we are proud to offer you.
Read the full story, "The Facts — and Gaps — on the Origin of the Coronavirus."
—Eugene Kiely, director, FactCheck.org
|