"Peace for our time"
1 July 2021
A weekly reflection on current global affairs concerning Israel and
the Jewish people from a Biblical perspective.
When British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain returned to London in September 1938 from talks with Hitler, holding in his hand the written Munich Agreement, he declared that he had achieved “peace for our time”.
“The settlement of the Czechoslovakian problem, which has now been achieved is, in my view, only the prelude to a larger settlement in which all Europe may find peace. This morning I had another talk with the German Chancellor, Herr Hitler, and here is the paper which bears his name upon it as well as mine. Some of you, perhaps, have already heard what it contains but I would just like to read it to you: ... We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again."
Hitler, of course, had no intention of complying. Within a year, the world was at war.
Written peace agreements are not always worth the paper they are written on. Territorial or other “settlements” reached by foreign powers in response to the ideologically-driven threat of force by the aggressor to annihilate a third party are hardly the basis for long-term peace.
Are we witnessing a similar process in the negotiations with Iran? Iran’s consistent efforts to destabilize the region include threats to annihilate Israel (the small Satan). The US Administration intends to re-enter the Obama-negotiated JCPOA agreement with Iran, which limits but does not prevent Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons. President Joe Biden wants to bring the US back into the deal but only if Iran returns to full compliance. Iran is basically saying: "No, we don't trust you, you go first. We will comply fully once sanctions are lifted."
UN Secretary-General Guterres has weighed in this week, urging the US to lift sanctions on Iran and re-enter the JCPOA. “I continue to believe that a full restoration of the plan remains the best way to ensure that the nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains exclusively peaceful.”
The US and UN are not directly threatened by Iran’s aggression, and threats of aggression. Israel is. Yet the new government also wants to be friends with the US.
Can Iran be trusted? As Dr. Kobi Michael explained in a recent webinar, Iran is preparing several places from which to be able to attack Israel. One of them is the Gaza Strip. Israel must manage all such existential threats simultaneously. Over recent years, in addition to dealing with Iran’s proxies Hezbollah (Lebanon) and Hamas (Gaza), Israel has launched cyber attacks, assassinations of nuclear scientists, and sabotage of Iran’s nuclear facilities.
In its negotiations with the US, Israel will surely not allow itself to be restricted in exercising its legitimate right to self-defence. Yet improving relations with the US are a core part of the new government’s strategy. Dr. Eric Mandel describes the dilemma and explores some of the options in his article in The Hill.
In the context of the foregoing, it is outrageous that former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon has published this week a piece in the Financial Times totally ignoring the existential threats facing Israel, accusing Israel of apartheid, and positioning Hamas as a victim of Israeli aggression.
Neither written agreements, nor prosecuting Israeli leaders for alleged “war crimes”, will bring peace in the Middle East. The real threat to peace comes from those who deny the right of the Jewish people to exist. It is the responsibility of the international community to do whatever is necessary to protect that right – even if that means conflict.
Peace depends, in the first instance, on mutual respect. Countries like UAE, Bahrain and Honduras are showing the way, by opening embassies and initiating cooperation with Israel.
The Editorial team
Israel & Christians Today
|
