For
Immediate Release
June 28,
2021
We Would Like to Know
Why
An
Open Letter to the Fifty-Five Catholic Bishops who Voted Against
Drafting a Teaching Document on the Most Holy Eucharist
Catholic Action for Faith and Family
Faithful Catholics know that we owe
respect and obedience to our shepherds in matters of faith and morals.
We recognize that spiritual institutions such as churches and families
run on these bonds of trust.
But bishops themselves owe a
measure of accountability to Christ and His flock for those same
matters.
This issue came to the fore this
past week when the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) voted
overwhelmingly to issue a teaching document on the beauty and power of
the Holy Eucharist.
In a wonderful follow-up statement
on the pastoral purpose for writing this document, Archbishop
José H. Gomez of Los Angeles,
president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said, “as
bishops, our desire is to deepen our people’s awareness of this great
mystery of faith, and to awaken their amazement at this divine gift,
in which we have communion with the living God.”
That pastoral purpose should be
more than sufficient; but it’s a no-brainer when you consider the
justification for forming a national eucharistic congress detailed on
page 7 in the 2021-2024 USCCB’s Strategic
Plan. The bishop’s
conference plan cites (a) declining Mass attendance, (b) the lack of
understanding of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist and (c)
increasing religious disaffiliation as major challenges facing the
Church today.
In short, the writers demonstrated
a sense of urgency to mobilize an effort to return the faithful back
to the Eucharist as the “source and summit” of our faith. Their
strategy is multi-phased. If executed properly over the next few
years, it will reach a positive tipping point in 2024. They note there
is much work required, but the plan is well-conceived, and now 75% of
the bishops voted to draft this document as integral to the overall
initiative.
Following the meeting, Bishop
Burbidge of Arlington, Virginia reinforced the purpose of the document
saying, “there isn’t anything brand new, it’s what the Church has
always taught in the Eucharist.” A week later, June 23, Bishop Thomas
Paprocki of the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois stressed that other
members of the hierarchy in Latin American have already united in the
teaching on “Eucharistic coherence.” It would seem that the entire
conference of US bishops will unite and organize their energies around
this objective.
Exciting and welcome news? But
wait!
After all of the discernment and
planning designed to unify the bishops on a well-established mission
critical initiative for the Church, there were fifty-five bishops who banded together during the semi-annual
meeting of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) to foment
division by working to destabilize if not derail altogether the
multi-year plan by voting against the other 168 bishops on an issue as
fundamental as drafting a clarifying document on Eucharistic practice.
Six other bishops abstained from taking any stance whatsoever on this
matter.
We – indeed all faithful Catholics
– would like to know why sixty-one bishops are not in union with the
perennial practice of the Church, as seen in the votes of the
two-thirds majority of the national conference on what the USCCB’s
doctrinal committee calls “Eucharistic coherence.”
This is not an idle question. The
Eucharist is not the bishops’ purview alone. To reiterate the
statement from Archbishop Gomez, it is the gift of every Catholic and
our responsibility from Christ as well.
As such, we the faithful approach
Your Excellencies without acrimony, pressure tactics, or name-calling,
asking for a response clarifying why you have refused to clarify the
truth about the central mystery of our faith in a time of serious
spiritual crisis.
Among the many questions we would
like answered are the following:
- If your
main concern is about Church unity, how is the unity of the Church
harmed by reinforcing the discipline concerning the Blessed Sacrament,
which countless teachings have called the “source and summit” of our
faith?
-
What part of then-Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger’s 2004 memo, entitled, “Worthiness to Receive Holy
Communion: General Principles,” is disagreeable to you and on what
theological basis is your disagreement founded?
-
Will delays in defining Eucharistic
coherence increase the vacuum inviting further unauthorized voices and
groups to chime in on its meaning and definition such as the sixty
so-called “Catholic Democrats in Congress” who signed a recent
statement politicizing the issue of
Communion?
- Finally,
we would like to know if you are aware that Pope Francis himself
recently refused President Biden participation in a papal Mass during
Mr. Biden’s recent trip to Europe?
As you can see by these questions,
Catholics are bewildered.
In a spirit of rigorous inquiry, we
would ask Your Excellencies to do an examination of conscience
concerning the basic realities surrounding the Eucharist.
First of all, please recall that
the reception of Holy Communion is not an issue limited to political
leaders and public figures; neither is disobedience and division among
the brethren. It deeply affects the lay faithful at the very
grassroots level of Church and society – us and our
families.
If we are accountable to the
Church’s teaching on Eucharistic worthiness (1 Cor 11:28-32), why must
we bear the burden of responsibility for Church teaching when public
figures who call themselves Catholic do not?
Secondly, if we must hand on the
teaching and discipline of the Sacraments to our children, with the
expectation that they will remain faithful to the same teaching, why
must we do this in an environment where public scandal to the faith
goes unaddressed by our bishops?
Please know that when our shepherds
fail to clarify and uphold the basic discipline of the Sacraments, you
directly undermine our
authority as parents to
hand on the faith to succeeding generations whose precious souls we
wish to be saved. Don’t the lay faithful deserve better spiritual
leadership than that?
When bishops refuse to implement
core teachings and disciplines of our faith, our families suffer. Your
Excellencies need to hear that directly from the faithful. We ask that
you make that a part of your evaluation of what Eucharistic practice
and Church unity really means.
We therefore urge Your Excellencies
to provide unambiguous answers to these questions regarding your vote.
We the faithful have a right to know why you did not support the
drafting of the document addressing the clear path of Eucharistic
integrity.
Offering prayerful support to Your
Excellencies in your ministry we remain,
Sincerely Yours in
Christ,
Thomas McKenna
About Catholic Action for Faith and Family
Catholic Action for Faith and
Family is especially charged with mobilizing the active participation
of the laity in the apostolate of the Church under the guidance of the
hierarchy to re-Christianize society. Its Faithful Echo mission is directed to drawing clergy and the lay
faithful in ever closer unity to combat the darkness of the present
confusion, error and division in the Church. In this case of
supporting the bishops in their efforts to revitalize the Eucharist as
the “source and summit” of our faith, we ask everyone to commit to
being Faithful Echoes of
the Eucharist.
|