Massachusetts School District Segregates
Students/Staff Based on Race
One by one, school districts across the country are being overcome by a
racist madness, and we are doing everything we can to expose this leftist
totalitarian assault on children and teachers. The latest horror story
occurs in Massachusetts.
We received 111
pages of records from Wellesley Public Schools in
Massachusetts which confirm the use of “affinity spaces” that divide
students and staff based on race as a priority and objective of the school
district’s “diversity, equity and inclusion” plan. The
school district also admitted that between September 1, 2020
and May 17, 2021, it created “five distinct” segregated
spaces.
We obtained the records after filing a May 17 Massachusetts Public
Records Law request for records concerning the number of affinity spaces,
the policies regarding their creation and use, the topics discussed, and
any analysis of whether affinity spaces that exclude certain races are
consistent with state and federal law, which would include the
14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the MA Equal Rights Amendment
and/or the MA School Attendance Law.
The Wellesley Public School records
include a document detailing the school district’s “Equity Strategic
Plan 2020-2025,” which includes a “District Equity by Design” plan
with the stated goal of amplifying student voices by providing
“opportunities for affinity spaces for students with shared
identity.”
In a section of the document titled “Diversity Staffing,” a
stated goal is to “Provide resources for affinity spaces for specialized
populations within the wider Faculty/Staff (ie. ALANA, Admin Leaders of
Color, LGBTQ+, White Educators for Antiracism, etc.)”
Wellesley Public Schools states in
its plan for “Diversity, Equity & Inclusion:” “We will practice
risk-taking and challenge one another to continuously examine systems of
privilege and bias, and work collectively to disrupt and dismantle inequity
in all its forms.”
In an email on
March 18 to Director of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Charmie R. Curry, the
day of the so-called “healing space,” a Wellesley High School fitness &
health teacher writes: “I wanted to check first, is it appropriate for me
to go to this healing space?” Curry responds: “This time, we want to
hold the space for Asian and Asian American students and faculty/staff. I
hope this makes sense.”
In an April 12 email to
school district colleagues, Curry notes that “Equity Literacy” is
required coursework in the district. Curry writes: “There is still plenty
of time to enroll in the two required courses – ‘Understanding
Equity and Inequity’ and ‘Learning to Be a Threat to Inequity.’ These
courses, with a keen focus on helping us to build/sharpen our structural
ideological lenses, are essential to our ability to address inequities in
our community. Our students who are being impacted by inequities such as
racism, homophobia, ableism, etc. need to be equipped to respond today to
their needs in order to positively impact their experiences.”
In
addition, the school district admitted that it does not have
any records analyzing whether such segregated spaces violate the U.S.
Constitution, the Massachusetts Constitution or any other law.
These documents confirm how Wellesley Public Schools segregated students
and staff by race in pursuit of extremist critical race theory agenda.
Wellesley marks the latest battle in our fight to expose the hard-left
“Critical Race Theory” agenda being pushed nationwide.
In May, we obtained
records from Maryland’s Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
which include documents related to their “Anti-racist system audit” and
critical race theory classes.
The documents reveal that students of “Maryland’s Largest School
District” who attended Thomas Pyle Middle School’s social justice class
were taught that the phrase “Make America Great Again” was an example
of “covert white supremacy.” The phrase is ranked on a pyramid just
below “lynching,” “hate crimes,” “the N-word” and “racial
slurs.” They were also taught that “white privilege” means being
favored by school authorities and having a positive relationship with the
police.
The documents show that Montgomery County Public Schools allocated over
$454,000 for an “Anti-racist system audit” by The Mid-Atlantic Equity
Consortium, a company that claims that their “expertise in using
intersectionality as part of its theory of change makes us uniquely
positioned to conduct the Anti-Racist Audit and mitigate the root causes of
systemic barriers.”
In February, we filed
a federal lawsuit on behalf of David Flynn, the father of two
Dedham Public School students, who was removed from his position as head
football coach after exercising his right as a citizen to raise concerns
about his daughter’s seventh-grade history class curriculum being changed
to include biased coursework on politics, race, gender equality, and
diversity. You can watch our video presentation on the Flynn case here.
This is work is significant but more is coming. Our children are under
assault. Our military is being targeted. Our tax dollars are being abused
and our rights are being attacked as the left pursues their radical agenda.
Judicial Watch has been exposing and litigating over critical race theory
and its progenitors for years – and our efforts will expand, with your
support, to meet the increased threats to our Republic.
Virginia Gives Illegal Aliens Tuition at Public Colleges, Aid for
Private Universities
Here’s a losing idea for taxpayers and the rule of law: Let’s make it
easier for people to live here illegally. Our Corruption
Chronicles blog takes
a look at such a scheme in Virginia.
Starting this fall Virginia will offer illegal immigrants discounted
in-state tuition at taxpayer-funded colleges as well as financial aid to
attend private universities. This month the state’s governor, Ralph
Northam, signed the new law during
a heavily publicized visit to Marymount University, a private Arlington
college with an enrollment of about 3,200.
“These students have grown up in our communities across Virginia,” the
Democrat lawmaker said during
the signing. “They’ve attended the same schools as their classmates and
neighbors, they have taken the same tests, they have played on the same
teams, eaten in the same lunchrooms and even gone to the same dances. They
are valued members of our communities, and they are Virginians in every
sense of the word except for immigration status – something that was
chosen for them, not by them, by families just wanting a better life for
their children.”
Virginia has 15 public four-year universities, according to its State
Council of Higher Education, and dozens of private institutions that
will help educate illegal immigrants on the taxpayer’s dime. While more
than a dozen other states offer illegal aliens discounted tuition at public
universities, Virginia is taking it a step further by also doling out money
for private education. The money will flow through a special program
called Virginia Tuition
Assistance Grant (TAG) that annually provides tens of thousands of
legal state residents with grants to attend private institutions of higher
learning. To be eligible, candidates must be a domiciliary resident of
Virginia as defined by the state code, which essentially says
individuals shall establish by “clear and convincing evidence” domicile
in the Commonwealth for a period of at least one year immediately
succeeding the establishment of domiciliary intent. It is not clear what if
any changes will be made to the code so illegal immigrants meet the
criteria.
More than 12,370
undocumented students are enrolled in higher education in Virginia
and the state sees 2,000 illegal immigrants graduate high school annually,
according to the Higher Ed Immigration Portal, a platform that tracks and
supports undocumented and international students in the U.S. Additionally,
Virginia has an illegal immigrant population of 265,830, the group’s
figures show. The nonprofit claims that its mission is to build a diverse
movement of partners and stakeholders advocating alongside immigrant and
international students. Its goal is to expand access to higher education,
degree completion, and post-graduate career success. “The U.S. is home to
more than 427,000 undocumented students enrolled in higher education,”
the portal states. “In their pursuit of higher education, undocumented
students actively ready themselves to fill critical skill shortages and
become better positioned to support their families, communities, and the
U.S. economy.”
At least 19
states offer illegal immigrants discounted tuition typically
reserved for legal residents, according to the National Conference of State
Legislatures. Seventeen of them— Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New
Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington—passed
laws to offer the perk. In two states—Oklahoma and Rhode Island—the
Board of Regents allows it. In 2013, the University of Hawaii’s Board of
Regents and the University of Michigan’s Board of Regents adopted similar
policies granting illegal aliens in-state tuition at their school. A year
later Virginia’s attorney general enacted a policy giving
in-state tuition to illegal immigrants protected by a controversial Obama
amnesty program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). At
the time more than 8,000 illegal immigrants qualified for the taxpayer
benefit. The attorney general proclaimed that it was the right thing to do
because the illegal immigrants are “Virginians” and the state “should
extend them an opportunity for an affordable education.” Three
states—Arizona, Georgia, and Indiana—have passed laws prohibiting
illegal immigrants from receiving discounted in-state tuition rates.
Last year Virginia passed a law granting
illegal immigrants special driver’s licenses. The measure directs the
Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to provide driver’s licenses
to applicants without a Social Security or taxpayer identification number
if they submit a certified statement that their information is true.
Democrat legislators introduced the law after promising an influential
group known as the Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights that they
would “ fight
hard” for immigrant rights, according to a local news report.
The same immigrant rights coalition has long demanded legislation to give
illegal aliens discounted in-state tuition at Virginia public colleges and
universities. One of the lawmakers behind the driver’s license
measure, Senator Jennifer Boysko who represents Fairfax, calls it
an “ economic
justice issue.”
Judicial Watch Sues HHS for Information on Covid-19 and Illegal
Immigration
The Biden administration’s secrecy on its border crisis includes
stonewalling on the issue of Covid-19 and illegal immigration and
controversial refugee resettlement programs.
That’s why we filed a FOIA lawsuit against the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) for COVID-19 technical guidance provided to
the Office of Refugee Resettlement relating to illegal aliens released by
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol
(Judicial
Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (No. 1:21-cv-01514)).
We sued after HHS failed to respond to an April 15, 2021, FOIA request
seeking access to:
All technical guidance provided to the Department of Health and Human
Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement related to the transmission,
testing, mitigation, and/or treatment of COVID-19 for undocumented
immigrants who are in or are released from Department of Homeland Security
and/or Customs and Border Patrol custody.
Our FOIA request was prompted by the April 15 congressional testimony of
Dr. Rochelle Walensky[TF1] , director of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention and the administrator of the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry. In her testimony, Dr. Walensky said:
“The CDC is providing technical assistance to the Office of Refugee
Resettlement for the people who are leaving the DHS [Department of Homeland
Security] and Customs and Border Protection.”
On April 30 we filed a FOIA lawsuit against
HHS for records about assaults on and abuse of unaccompanied alien children
in its custody.
Jailed Murderer Wins Office in D.C. Election with Five Inmate
Candidates
Your nation’s capital is controlled by leftist politicians who often
experiment with extremist policies, such as allowing incarcerated criminals
to vote. Our Corruption Chronicles blog has a report
on the foreseeable outcome of this contempt for the rule of law:
As the homicide rate hits a record high in Washington D.C. the city elects
a convicted murderer to public office in a unique election featuring all
inmate candidates. The freshly elected public official, Joel Caston, has
been in prison for 26 years and is currently incarcerated at the District
of Columbia Jail. In 1996 Caston was convicted by a jury of first-degree
murder for ambushing and killing a man in the city’s Anacostia
neighborhood. Court records obtained by Judicial Watch indicate that a 2016
appeal was denied. In the document,
Caston’s attorneys name the victim, which is not common practice today.
Court records also reveal a “speed loader”—a device used to rapidly
load ammunition into a firearm—was found by police under Caston’s
mattress after the shooting. It contained six rounds of 44 caliber
ammunition as well as additional rounds of ammo.
Now Caston is a commissioner on D.C.’s Advisory
Neighborhood Commission (ANC), which advises the D.C. Council and
other local government entities involving matters ranging from liquor
license applications to public safety. Commissioners serve two-year terms
and are elected in even-numbered years. The ANC was established to bring
“government closer to the people, and to bring the people closer to
government,” according to its website. Caston was chosen by voters to
represent Ward 7, one of D.C.’s most crime-infested areas. It is
represented by Councilman Vince Gray, an ex-D.C. mayor who was embroiled in
a campaign finance scandal. The Ward 7 ANC seat has never been occupied and
D.C. officials conducted an unprecedented election earlier this month to
fill the post. All five candidates and the majority of voters they courted
are incarcerated at the same prison with Caston, according to a
local news
report.
Last year the D.C. Council passed legislation allowing
incarcerated convicted felons to vote. Besides D.C. only two states—Maine
and Vermont—let imprisoned criminals cast ballots, according to
the National
Conference of State Legislatures. After the measure was enacted in
D.C., a group of commissioners and a nonprofit called Neighbors
for Justice launched an effort to fill the empty ANC seat and
pressure the local Department of Corrections to notify inmates they
qualified to run for the post. Neighbors for Justice was founded in August
2020 by residents near the D.C. prison who want to support “neighbors at
the jail during COVID and beyond.” The group offered all the felon
candidates a forum
to deliver their campaign message from their cell clad in orange prison
uniforms. In the promotional campaign videos, Caston is the only candidate
who is not wearing the orange uniform. Instead, he appears in a white
sweatshirt with a logo that reads “credible messenger.” In the short
segment, Caston says “my platform would be used to restore the dignity of
incarcerated people that we would no longer be judged by our worst mistake
and establish equality for both the male and the female population that has
often been overlooked inside this space.”
Caston will be issued a laptop or tablet, an electronic mail account, and a
workspace in the prison where he can dedicate eight hours a day to his
duties as commissioner, the founder of Neighbors for Justice said in a
local newspaper article.
“It’s not just about a historic election, with a first-ever ANC
commissioner who is incarcerated,” said Julie Johnson, the group’s
founder. “It’s about giving a voice and visibility to a population that
is unseen.” In the same story, Caston says that he feels
“presidential” after winning the election. On its website Neighbors for
Justice congratulates Caston, writing that he will serve as the ward’s
inaugural commissioner and confirming that the murderer received 48 of the
142 votes cast in the “historic election.” The note proudly announces
that “all five candidates in this election are in residence at the DC
jail.”
While they celebrate the election triumph of a convicted murderer,
homicides in D.C. are on pace to shatter records. Last year the rate hit a
16-year high and in 2021 it is expected to be worse, according to
Metropolitan Police Department data. The
figures show homicides are already up 13% from last year. A few months ago,
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser declared that gun
violence is a public health crisis. Weeks later she clumped her
city’s pervasive gun violence with the COVID-19 pandemic, saying this in
a statement:
“Many communities across the nation, including Washington, DC, continue
to be burdened by two simultaneous public health emergencies. The first is
the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has hit our Black and
Latino communities the hardest. The second is the gun-related violence that
continues to devastate many of those same communities. Even in 2020, when
much of the country shut down for weeks at a time, deaths from gun violence
reached historic levels.”
New York Votes Amid Crisis of Crime and Disorder
Crime in our nation’s big cities is out of control, and ordinary citizens
are caught between leftist politicians running these cities and criminals.
New York City’s mayoral is showing that public safety is a concern of
both Republican and Democratic voters, as Micah Morrison, our chief
investigative reporter, details
in his Investigative Bulletin.
New Yorkers went to the polls Tuesday amid a spiraling crisis of urban
violence. In a city where Democrats outnumber Republicans six to one,
Tuesday’s primary voting will effectively decide the elections. Up for
grabs are the office of mayor, city comptroller, public advocate, the
majority of the city council, and the powerful office of Manhattan district
attorney.
The candidates felt the heat. Crime and disorder are sharply up in the
city, and the issue has dominated the last months of campaigning. The
numbers tell the story: for May 2021, the overall crime rate rose
twenty-two percent, compared with May 2020, according to NYPD
statistics. Robberies increased forty-six percent. Assaults increased
twenty percent. Shootings increased seventy-three percent.
The city’s iconic Washington Square Park has become a nightly
battleground between lowlifes and police, with horrified local
residents clamoring for more security. Open drug use and drinking are
widespread. On a typical recent Saturday night, protestors hurled objects
at police, a woman was assaulted, two men were slashed with a razor, and a
77-year-old cook was hurled through the window of a nearby diner.
The subways—an economic lifeline for the city—have become a danger
zone. “Minor” crimes such as turnstile-jumping, drinking alcohol,
and public urination are commonplace. Assaults, rapes and murders are up.
Overall, subway crime has jumped ninety-three percent from the previous
year, according to NYPD statistics.
Our friends at the Wall Street Journal remind
us that after inheriting a prosperous, safe city from mayors Rudy
Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg, Bill de Blasio squandered the legacy.
“Crime and disorder have returned amid progressive assaults on police and
anti-crime strategies that worked. Bail reform let repeat offenders free.
The mentally ill homeless attack subway riders and pedestrians. The mayor
had his police chief disband the anti-crime unit that searched for illegal
guns, and shooting have soared.”
Crime is up in cities large and small
across America. In Miami, murders are up thirty percent year over year. In
Chicago, 294 people have been murdered as of June 12—that’s twenty-one
more than the same period last year. In Jackson, Mississippi, homicides are
up nearly seventy percent year over year. In Lubbock, Texas, homicides
doubled from 2019 to 2020. In Atlanta, murders, rapes, and assaults are
rising. In Denver, murders are up twenty-three percent and shootings
sixty-two percent.
The New York races were populated mostly by the progressive Left. The
candidates’ platforms continue the policies of the de Blasio years or
take the city even further down the progressive path with plans to shift
funds from the NYPD and empty the jails. A handful of relative moderates,
such as mayoral candidate Eric
Adams and Manhattan DA contender Tali
Farhadian Weinstein, made aggressive crime reduction centerpieces of
their campaigns.
New York has instituted a program of complex ranked-choice
voting and absentee ballots are still to be counted. But
preliminary election returns show Adams in front, with a strong lead over
far-left candidate Maya
Wiley, thirty-two percent to twenty-two percent. In the Manhattan DA
race, which does not use ranked voting, center-left candidate Alvin
Bragg holds a narrow lead over Farhadian Weinstein, with absentee
ballots still to be counted. Radical progressive candidates in a handful of
races appear to have fended off ranked choice challenges and captured City
Council seats and the comptroller’s office.
Adams—a former cop and former Republican—has caused much
hand-wringing among the New York cognoscenti. Left-wing hopes were
high for a successor to de Blasio, and an Adams victory will be widely
interpreted as a setback for progressives. With ranked-choice still to play
out and absentee ballots to be counted, final results won’t be announced
until July.
Meanwhile, the mayhem continues.
Until next week,
|