They’re using it to detect, respond to and understand the spread of online falsehoods  Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
[link removed]
• In this edition you will find:
• Highlights of a few automated fact-checking projects
• Africa Check “resurrects” Mr. Bean
• Agência Lupa recognized for visualizing the pandemic
The bots are back in town
By Lucky clover/shutterstock

Wednesday’s IFCN Talk highlighted the work of the Duke Reporters’ Lab’s automated fact-checking project, Squash, but as director Bill Adair noted, it’s far from the only fact-checking project using automation to fight falsehoods.
Argentine fact-checking network Chequeado ([link removed]) launched its automated fact-checking bot ([link removed]) Chequeabot in 2018, which uses scans of transcripts from media organizations to help identify claims for fact-checkers. A 2019 Poynter article ([link removed]) found that roughly one of five fact checks written by Chequado started from a claim detected by its chatbot.
British fact-checking organization Full Fact ([link removed]) , which has collaborated with Chequado on a number of automated fact-checking projects, has been researching this technology ([link removed]) since 2015. In addition to detection, Full Fact has used automation to keep track of how many times a false claim has been repeated, and help fact-checkers respond to claims in real time. In 2019, a collaboration between Full Fact, Chequeado and Africa Check was recognized by Google’s AI Impact challenge out of a field of 2,600 applicants.
More recently, Spanish fact-checker Maldita.es ([link removed]) has used automation to both speed up responses ([link removed]) to fact-checking requests from its audience, and detect potential patterns in the types of falsehoods most commonly spread. This was especially important during the COVID-19 pandemic when requests for fact-checking skyrocketed on Maldita.es’ WhatsApp tipline.
Aos Fatos in Brazil has had similar success using automation to both detect falsehoods ([link removed]) and disseminate fact-checks ([link removed]) .
But for automation to really work, fact-checkers need help both in growing their ranks and in growing their audience.
Adair identified the need for more fact checks and more fact-checkers as a limiting factor on the effectiveness of Squash’s detection powers. In Spain, Maldita.es co-founder and CEO Clara Jiménez Cruz said her organization’s chatbot is only as powerful as its audience since it requires user submissions to pick up on patterns of falsehoods.
That’s why media literacy has been so crucial, with organizations like Chequeado ([link removed]) , MediaWise ([link removed]) and a host of other fact-checkers around the world putting an emphasis on training the public on the basics of fighting online falsehoods. Automation can enhance fact-checkers’ work, but only public buy-in can defeat disinformation.

Interesting fact checks
Photo by Jonathan Short/Invision/AP
• Africa Check: "Social media keeps killing Rowan Atkinson – but he’s still not dead" ([link removed]) (in English)
• Africa Check chronicled the various attempts to virtually shuffle off the British comedian’s mortal coil to no avail. He was first pronounced virtually dead in 2012. Africa Check completed its debunk by referencing an AFP fact check where Atkinson’s talent management confirmed he’s not dead.
• ColombiaCheck: "The message stating that 'WhatsApp changed its privacy without prior notice' is false" ([link removed]) (in Spanish)
• A message went viral stating (falsely) that WhatsApp had changed its privacy settings to allow users to be added to group messages without their consent or knowledge. ColombiaCheck and Spanish fact-checker Newtral discovered the opposite was true. In April 2019, WhatsApp gave users the option to limit who can add them to group messages to just their contacts.
Quick hits
Screenshot from the June 24th IFCN Talk
From the news:
• “Fiverr’s jobbing actors play a starring role in Pakistan’s fake news business,” ([link removed]) from Coda Story. Users of the freelancer directory are being recruited to act like broadcast journalists for fake news programs used to spread pro-Pakistani propaganda.
• “Fact-checkers face obstacles to bring news to Gazans during wartime,” ([link removed]) from Al-Monitor. The Palestinian Observatory for Verification and Media Professionalism said lack of open records laws and distrust from some in the Israeli public hampered its fact-checking work during the recent Gaza conflict.
• “Hamburgers, Fauci and election fraud: How Biden World combats disinformation,” ([link removed]) from Politico. Advocacy groups and the Democratic National Committee are taking a more active role in monitoring and debunking mis- and disinformation.
From/for the community:
• “‘We need more troops’ — automated fact-checking needs more volume to succeed,” ([link removed]) from Poynter. The team from the Duke Reporters’ Lab shared lessons from their automated fact-checking program, Squash, at Wednesday’s IFCN Talk.
• “Facebook expands fact-checking in India, adds health-specialist partner amid Covid concerns,” ([link removed]) from ANI News. The Healthy Indian Project is joining Facebook’s Third-Party Fact-Checking Program to help fight health related misinformation on the platform.
• Agência Lupa ([link removed]) from Brazil won a Sigma Award ([link removed]) for its multimedia project No Epicentro (At the epicenter). Its project helps users understand the pandemic by visualizing the number of people who’ve died as a radius from the user’s address.

If you are a fact-checker and you’d like your work/projects/achievements highlighted in the next edition, send us an email at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) by next Tuesday.

Any corrections? Tips? We’d love to hear from you: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) .

Thanks for reading Factually.
[link removed]
Help elevate fact-checkers and fact-checking.
GIVE NOW ([link removed])
Harrison Mantas
Reporter, IFCN
@HarrisonMantas ([link removed])

[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] mailto:[email protected]?subject=Feedback%20for%20Poynter
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
© All rights reserved Poynter Institute 2021
801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
If you don't want to receive email updates from Poynter, we understand.
You can update your subscription preferences here ([link removed]) or unsubscribe ([link removed]) .