Sadly, we feared this would happen. But it doesn’t make it any less of a gut punch.
And, even more sadly, the citizens of Chicago, and consumers of good journalism, are worse off because of it.
Almost 40 journalists at the Chicago Tribune are taking buyouts and leaving the paper, according to a report in the Tribune.
Almost 40!
That number includes some of the most talented voices in the business and some of the most influential writers in the Windy City.
But as I said, this is no surprise. The buyouts come not long after hedge fund Alden Global Capital acquired Tribune Publishing, owner of the Tribune and other publications, for $633 million. Buyouts were first offered to nonunion editors and support staff, and more than a dozen accepted. Then another 24 newsroom union employees applied for and were accepted for buyouts.
Many include some of the highest-profile names at the paper, including columnists Mary Schmich, whom I mentioned in the newsletter earlier this week, Dahleen Glanton, Steve Chapman, Heidi Stevens, Eric Zorn and John Kass. In addition, Phil Rosenthal also is leaving. He’s another of Chicago’s notable voices, having been a media columnist, a business columnist and a sports columnist.
In a Facebook post, Rosenthal said it was a “tough decision.” He added, “The Tribune will continue changing in its bid to endure, as will I.
But I have concluded the changes I need to make will be achieved more efficiently away from the evolving paper. I will miss it greatly, I’m sure.”
Greg Pratt, a Tribune reporter and guild president, told the Tribune that three union members applied for the buyout but were denied. The union hopes those cases will be reconsidered. Pratt added that after the buyouts, the guild will represent more than 80 newsroom employees.
Pratt told the Tribune, “We are sad to be losing outstanding journalists at the Chicago Tribune but we respect and honor those who are leaving. It’s important to know that outstanding journalists are going to stick around, too, and we will continue doing vital work for our readers.”
I asked my colleague Rick Edmonds, Poynter’s media business analyst, for his thoughts, and he told me, "Departures at the Chicago Tribune were to be expected after the Alden takeover, but this sounds like a wipeout of the most popular columnists and other high profile journalists. That can’t be good for audience retention.”
And it’s awful for one of the great American newspapers.
Former Tribune editor Ann Marie Lipinski, who is on Poynter’s board of trustees, tweeted, “The scale of talent leaving the Chicago Tribune is staggering. Combined with January buyouts, a hedge fund’s takeover is driving out irreplaceable experience, Pulitzer winners among them. Incalculable loss for Chicago. If you live in a city with a local paper, take care of it.”
Chicago media writer Robert Feder wrote, “Make no mistake: Chicago’s business and philanthropic communities allowed this to happen to a vital public trust despite pleas from many quarters. Epic fail.
Also, check out Julie Reynolds’ piece for Nieman Lab: “Alden Global Capital and Tribune’s board are dancing at the edge of the law.”
Those involved in Khashoggi murder received training in US
Here’s quite the stunning paragraph from The New York Times’ Mark Mazzetti, Julian E. Barnes and Michael LaForgia:
“Four Saudis who participated in the 2018 killing of the Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi received paramilitary training in the United States the previous year under a contract approved by the State Department, according to documents and people familiar with the arrangement.”
The Times reported that the training was provided by Tier 1 Group, an Arkansas-based security company owned by the private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management. The Times also reported that there is no evidence that U.S. officials or Tier 1 Group executives knew what activities those trained were involved in.
“But,” the Times wrote, “the fact that the government approved high-level military training for operatives who went on to carry out the grisly killing of a journalist shows how intensely intertwined the United States has become with an autocratic nation. It also underscores the perils of military partnerships with repressive governments and demonstrates how little oversight exists for those forces after they return home.”
What a gift
For this item, I turned it over to Poynter media business analyst Rick Edmonds.
The New York Times announced a new “gift articles” program Tuesday. Subscribers can share, for free, up to 10 articles a month with non-subscribers. Gift articles will not count against the monthly limit that non-subscribers can read before they hit the paywall.
Currently, unregistered recipients will be given a skippable prompt to register. That would provide the Times with an email or other contact information to which it can send sample newsletters or other subscription solicitations.
That is important strategically to the company. CEO Meredith Kopit-Levien said in the Times’ most recent quarterly earnings report that besides more than 7 million paying subscribers, it now has roughly 100 million registered users. Each is a prospect for eventually becoming a paid digital subscriber, and the company is looking for more.
The Washington Post has a similar benefit, allowing subscribers to send a one-month free pass to a friend, who is then asked to register with an email address.
Jemele Hill’s next big move