Some of the claims are eerily similar to those debunked in the United States Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
[link removed]
• In this edition you will find:
• A look at the proliferation of claims about election fraud.
• Raskrinkavanje.ba uncovers another Facebook scam.
• Squash brings us one step closer to automated fact-checking.
A fraudulent export
AP Photo/Martin Mejia

As the debate in the United States ([link removed]) rages over the voting reform bills inspired by false claims of election fraud, fact-checkers in Germany, Brazil and Peru are contending with eerily similar falsehoods.
Ahead of regional elections in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt, a member of the conservative Alternative for Germany party, or AfD, claimed mail-in votes would be tampered with to swing the election for his party’s rivals. German fact-checking outlet Correctiv ([link removed]) rebutted this claim by noting its similarities to falsehoods from the United States and by referring readers to a list of safeguards put in place by state election authorities.
After the election, when the AfD performed poorly compared to pre-election polling, another party member shared a tweet claiming to come from an election worker who’d tampered with ballots. Correctiv fact-checked ([link removed]) this claim by pointing out the image was from a polling place in Maine during the 2020 U.S. presidential election
In Peru, which is currently in the midst of a tightly contested presidential election, fact-checking organization Verificador ([link removed]) dealt with several claims alleging fraud, including one that alleged election officials had purposely thrown out votes ([link removed]) in one precinct. It turns out that the number of votes cast did not match the number of people who voted, which as Verificador explained triggered a Peruvian law requiring those votes be discounted.
In Brazil, fact-checkers are dealing with falsehoods attacking that country’s system of voting. Brazil switched over to a completely electronic form of voting in 1996 in which voters use electronic machines (not connected to the internet) to type in their choice of candidate. Fact-checkers now are facing a slew of falsehoods attacking this system for not having a paper backup, and alleging the machines are able to be hacked.
However, Gilberto Scofield Jr., business and development director for the Brazillian fact-checking network Agência Lupa ([link removed]) , said at Tuesday’s IFCN Talk ([link removed]) that Brazil’s voting system has not had a single credible case of tampering or fraud since it was first adopted.
“So I think that made politicians, in general, a little upset with the less possibility of fraud during the elections,” Scofield Jr. quipped. He discussed how Agência Lupa partnered with Brazil’s Supreme Electoral Court to train election officials how to spot and rebut claims of election fraud.
“It would be impossible for us in Rio de Janeiro to fight or fact-check or debunk any kind of claim going on,” Scofield Jr. said. He explained that training local officials to debunk falsehoods in their respective precincts improves the countrywide safety net against false claims of fraud.

Interesting fact checks
Photo by Raskrinkavanje.ba
• The Quint/WebQoof "Rajasthan Govt Only Vaccinating Rohingya Muslims? False Claim" ([link removed]) (in English)
• A social media post falsely claimed an Indian court struck down a policy in the northwestern Indian state of Rajasthan that barred Hindu refugees from Pakistan from getting the COVID-19 vaccine. The Quint discovered Rajasthan was limiting vaccinations to those with either Indian citizenship cards or United Nations refugee cards. The court order required Rajasthan to vaccinate its entire population regardless of citizenship or documentation.
• Raskrinkavanje.ba: "Facebook Scams: Fake page deactivation notification," ([link removed]) (in Bosnian)
• A series of Facebook pages branded themselves as “Business Terms and Policies” and used fake accusations of policy violations to extract login information from other pages and users. Raskrinkavanje.ba discovered the scam involved leveraging the fear of deactivation to get targeted pages to click on a link where they could input their username and password.
Quick hits
Screenshot of June 15th IFCN Talk
From the news:
• "Experts Call Disinformation on Miami's Spanish Radio a ‘Psychological Cancer," ([link removed]) from Miami New Times. A report by the communications firm Prospero Latino and the progressive political organization Florida Rising found Spanish language radio stations echoing falsehoods about the role of Trump supporters in the Jan. 6 insurrection. It also found radio hosts have invoked fears of repressive socialist governments in South America to attack progressive policy proposals.
• "The Brazilian doctor offering bogus Covid remedies for social media likes," ([link removed]) from the BBC. Dr. Albert Dickson, an eye doctor and state representative from the northeast of Brazil is offering free medical consultations and prescriptions to unproven drugs to treat COVID-19 in exchange for subscribing to his YouTube channel. The platform has previously removed 12 of his videos for violating its policies on medical misinformation.
From/for the community:
• "The lessons of Squash, the first automated fact-checking platform," ([link removed]) from Poynter. Duke Reporters’ Lab director Bill Adair chronicles the journey of the lab’s automated fact-checking program Squash from a dream in 2007 to near-reality 14 years later.
• "There will always be claims of cheating’ in elections, but fact-checkers can work together to fight back," ([link removed]) from Poynter. Fact-checkers from Brazil, the Philippines and Ghana discussed the challenges of fact-checking elections, and the ways fact-checkers can collaborate with local authorities and non-governmental organizations to form a xxxxxx against election misinformation.
Events and training
[link removed]
IFCN promotional photo
• June 23 — IFCN Talks #7: Lessons of Squash, Duke’s groundbreaking automated fact-checking platform: The Duke Reporters’ Lab is wrapping up its automated fact-checking project “Squash,” and will be joining IFCN Talks to discuss the promises and pitfalls of the project, as well as where automated fact-checking will go from here. Sign up here ([link removed]) .

If you are a fact-checker and you’d like your work/projects/achievements highlighted in the next edition, send us an email at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) by next Tuesday.

Any corrections? Tips? We’d love to hear from you: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) .

Thanks for reading Factually.
[link removed]
Help elevate fact-checkers and fact-checking. ([link removed])
GIVE NOW ([link removed])
Harrison Mantas
Reporter, IFCN
@HarrisonMantas ([link removed])

[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] mailto:[email protected]?subject=Feedback%20for%20Poynter
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
© All rights reserved Poynter Institute 2021
801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
If you don't want to receive email updates from Poynter, we understand.
You can update your subscription preferences here ([link removed]) or unsubscribe ([link removed]) .