From Barry C. Lynn, Open Markets Institute <[email protected]>
Subject The Corner Newsletter: Open Markets Discusses the Dangers of Health Care Monopolies — and How the VA Hospital System Can Help to Combat Them
Date June 4, 2021 6:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
No images? Click here [link removed]

Welcome to The Corner. In this issue, we discuss the dangers of health care monopolies — and how the VA hospital system can help to combat them.

Longman Testifies About How the VA Helps Fight Hospital Monopolies

Open Markets’ policy director Phillip Longman (above) testified [[link removed]] before the House Veterans Affairs Committee [[link removed]] last week. Longman spoke about the vital role played by the Department of Veterans Affairs’ 1,700 hospitals, clinics, and other health care facilities in preserving competition in increasingly monopolized medical markets. In many metropolitan areas, the VA is the only remaining health provider that has not been absorbed by large corporate chains. The hearing took place in anticipation of a Biden administration proposal to spend $18 billion [[link removed]] on rebuilding aging VA infrastructure, and amid fears that a soon-to-be appointed federal commission [[link removed]] might recommend closing many VA facilities and privatizing more VA services.

As Covid Leads to More Hospital Mergers, Officials May Be Waking Up to the Problem of Health Care Monopolies

On Wednesday, a giant health care merger made headlines because it didn’t happen. Facing the threat of a lawsuit from North Carolina’s attorney general, Sentara Healthcare and Cone Health nixed [[link removed]] their plan to become a vertically integrated $11.5 billion hospital/health insurance combine that would have dominated health care markets in Virginia and North Carolina.

As with any man-bites-dog story, this nonmerger was newsworthy precisely because of its exceeding rarity. The trend toward concentration in hospitals is so strong that not even the coronavirus has been able to reverse it. Last year saw 79 hospital deals [[link removed]], down only slightly from 92 in 2019. Indeed, as The New York Times recently reported [[link removed]], much of the $178 billion in emergency Provider Relief Package money that the federal government spent during the early months of the pandemic wound up being used by the richest, most powerful hospitals to go on acquisition binges.

At the time, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) was among a small group of lawmakers who called on then-Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar to ensure that the funds be awarded only to hospitals serving community interests and not to private equity-backed hospital systems. Now, Porter is calling on [[link removed]] the Federal Trade Commission to hold hearings on the dispersal of the Provider Relief Package. “We are concerned, based on our review of mergers and acquisitions in 2020 and early 2021, that hospitals and health systems used these COVID-19 funds to finance mergers, rather than to care for patients or to maintain operations,” Porter and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) wrote in a letter to FTC Acting Chairwoman Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Health Secretary Xavier Becerra.

The pair go on to express fear over the harm to consumers that hospital consolidation poses. U.S. consumers pay higher costs for poorer quality care than other developed countries. Although overuse is routinely cast as the culprit for this imbalance, an Open Markets’ 2019 report [[link removed]] shows that consolidation is overwhelmingly at fault.

Hospital markets in 90% of metro areas are highly concentrated. And extensive research evidence [[link removed]] shows that such consolidation leads to substantial price increases for hospitals, insurers, and physicians, without offsetting gains in improved quality or enhanced efficiency. Consolidation has also led to massive numbers of hospital closures, particularly in rural and low-income urban neighborhoods.

We may, however, finally be approaching an inflection point. Not only do we see state attorneys general like North Carolina’s Josh Stein [[link removed]] beginning to use their broad statutory powers to block hospital mergers in their own backyards, but there are signs of a broad bipartisan consensus emerging at the national level. As Washington Monthly’s Eric Cortellessa recently wrote [[link removed]], Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley and Connecticut Democrat Sen. Richard Blumenthal are rarely political allies, but at a recent Senate hearing [[link removed]] they were “practically finishing each other’s sentences” as they questioned a panel of witnesses on the negative effects of concentration in the hospital market. Democrats and Republicans might not agree on much these days, but at least they increasingly agree that something needs to be done about the problem of monopoly in health care.


Last week, the European Commission announced an impending investigation into Facebook’s anti-competitive conduct in the classified advertising market. Officials are investigating whether the company has distorted the market by promoting its Marketplace services for free to users of the company’s social media services. This promotion could come at the expense of other companies using the website to sell products. ( Financial [[link removed]] Times [[link removed]])

Last week, Germany’s Federal Cartel Office, the Bundeskartellamt, launched an investigation into Google over the company’s handling of user data. The office will investigate whether users of Google’s services have a choice in how their data is used across the company’s array of product offerings. ( Reuters [[link removed]])

The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) recently issued a joint statement [[link removed]] titled “Competition and data protection in digital markets.” The report marks a pioneering effort to begin to bring competition and privacy regulation into better alignment. CMA head Andrea Coscelli and ICO head Elizabeth Denham said, “There are strong synergies between the interests of data protection and competition… This paper sets out how we will enhance the synergies between our policy agendas and, where we do identify the potential for tensions, explains how we will seek to address them.”

Last week, the District of Columbia’s Office of the Attorney General launched an antitrust lawsuit against Amazon, accusing the retailer of anti-competitive conduct regarding the pricing policy the company imposes on third parties selling products on its marketplace. The lawsuit claims that Amazon’s Fair Pricing Policy, also known as a “most favored nation” clause, prevents third-party sellers from offering products for a lower price on platforms other than Amazon. ( Quartz [[link removed]])

In a proposed settlement announced Tuesday, the Department of Justice will require Zen-Noh Grain Corp. to divest nine of its grain elevators located in five states along the Mississippi River. The mandated divestiture follows on the heels of the corporation’s proposed $300 million acquisition of nearly 50 grain elevators from Bunge North America Inc., which spurred the DOJ to file a civil antitrust lawsuit and block the merger. If approved by the courts, the Justice Department says the settlement will protect U.S. farmers and competition. ( Department [[link removed]] of Justice [[link removed]])

Google is close to settling an antitrust case in France, which alleges that the tech giant abused its market power in digital advertising by self-preferencing its own ad services and tools. If the settlement is approved by the authority board, Google would likely pay a fine as well as improve the interoperability of its online ad auction house, AdX, while removing other competitive obstacles that rivals face. ( The [[link removed]] [[link removed]] Wall Street Journal [[link removed]])

Earlier this week, AliveCor Inc. filed an antitrust lawsuit, alleging that Apple has monopolized the heart-rate technology market for its Apple Watch. AliveCor previously sold a product called KardiaBand, a feature designed for the Apple Watch that's capable of recording an electrocardiogram. However, the private company says Apple changes the heart-rate algorithm on its watch’s operating system, shutting out competitors by making rival technologies incompatible. ( Reuters [[link removed]])


Open Markets published an interactive map [[link removed]] showcasing the latest anti-monopoly work being done in each state: “Using extensive datasets from U.S. PIRG [[link removed]] and the National Conference of State Legislatures [[link removed] Conference of State Legislatures], the Open Markets Institute has assembled a database of more than 100 significant state anti-monopoly proposals and laws enacted or considered between 2018 and 2021.”

Sally Hubbard was featured on National Public Radio [[link removed]] in a piece about Apple’s monopoly power. “If you're a developer of apps or a small business or any business that wants to have an app, you have no choice but to go through Apple because Apple is responsible for two-thirds of all app store revenue worldwide.”

Reporting on Lina Khan’s FTC nomination continued to mention her start as Open Markets’ legal director. Her role was referenced in The Wall Street Journal [[link removed]] and WixRoom [[link removed]]: “She served as legal director of the Open Markets Institute, a group that favors aggressive trustbusting.”

Sandeep Vaheesan was mentioned in Politico [[link removed]], Politico Morning Tech [[link removed]], Beeion [[link removed]], Newsraiser [[link removed]], and Freeads World News [[link removed]], detailing Big Tech’s dangerous lobbying power on the Hill. “'One reason tech antitrust has attracted so much attention on the Hill is because the victims are not only small and medium-sized enterprises, workers and consumers — but also other large corporations,’ said Sandeep Vaheesan, a legal director with anti-monopoly think tank Open Markets Institute.”

Barry Lynn was quoted in Vice [[link removed]], Common Dreams [[link removed]], S&P Global [[link removed]], and The Defender [[link removed]] opposing Amazon’s plan to take over MGM. Open Markets released a statement [[link removed]] as well. “The good news is that blocking this merger is easy to do. The takeover of MGM is a dangerous horizontal consolidation of two studios, in an already highly consolidated business,” said Barry Lynn, executive director of Open Markets Institute, in a press statement. “And it is a vertical consolidation of power between one of the primary platforms for the sale and distribution of movies and one of the studios that creates movies, which will only worsen Amazon’s already dangerous conflict of interest in dealing fairly with other studios.”

Sally Hubbard was quoted in Wired [[link removed]] and Law 360 [[link removed]] emphasizing that because of its inexplicably poor conduct, Amazon might have to settle in the new antitrust suit filed by the District of Columbia attorney general. “As long as it’s actually having the same effect as a most-favored-nation, it’s a loser case for Amazon,” said Sally Hubbard, the director of enforcement strategy at the Open Markets Institute, an anti-monopoly think tank. “It’s quite straightforward that the conduct is eliminating competition and causing higher prices.”

Johnny Ryan was featured in a Market Research Telecast [[link removed]] piece about the General Data Protection Regulation. “For Ryan, the GDPR is ultimately a kind of ’collective hallucination’ that must be made tangible by the courts.”

Sally Hubbard was mentioned by ILSR [[link removed]] for testifying in favor of New York state's Twenty-First Century Antitrust Act. “ILSR Legal Fellow Shaoul Sussman testified in favor of the bill during a Senate hearing in October, alongside ILSR allies and antimonopoly experts Tim Wu, Sally Hubbard, Harry First and others. Now, the bill has been amended and is quickly moving through the Senate, with hopes of passage this legislative year.”

We appreciate your readership. Please consider making a contribution to support the continued publication of this newsletter.

DONATE [[link removed]] 📈 VITAL STAT: 21%

The percentage [[link removed]] of Amazon’s corporate revenue derived only from fees imposed on third-party sellers.

📚 WHAT WE'RE READING: “ Special Delivery [[link removed]]” (Institute for Local Self-Reliance, Kennedy Smith): Smith discusses how food delivery apps developed by independent businesses are a much better alternative than traditional food delivery apps like Uber Eats and DoorDash, in part because they charge lower fees to merchants and pay delivery drivers more.



Liberty From All Masters

The New American Autocracy vs. The Will of the People

St. Martin’s Press has published Open Markets Executive Director Barry Lynn’s new book, Liberty [[link removed]] f [[link removed]] rom All Masters [[link removed]].

Liberty is Lynn’s first book since 2010’s Cornered. In his new work, Lynn warns of the threat to liberty and democracy posed by Google, Amazon, and Facebook, because of their ability to manipulate the flows of information and business in America. Barry then details how Americans over the course of two centuries built a “System of Liberty,” and shows how we Americans can put this system to work again today. Lynn also offers a hopeful vision for how we can use anti-monopoly law to rebuild our society and our democracy from the ground up.

Liberty from All Masters has already made waves for its empowering call to restore democracy by resurrecting forgotten tools and institutions. “Very few thinkers in recent years have done more to shift debate in Washington than Barry Lynn. In Liberty from All Masters, he proves himself as a lyrical theorist and a bold interpreter of history. This book is an elegant summoning of a forgotten tradition that can help the nation usher in a new freedom,” says Franklin Foer, author of World Without Mind and national correspondent for The Atlantic.

You can order your copy of Lynn’s book here [[link removed]].




7 Ways Big Corporations Rule Your Life and How to Take Back Control

Simon & Schuster published Monopolies Suck [[link removed]] by Sally Hubbard on Oct. 27. The book is the first by Hubbard, who is Open Markets’ director of enforcement strategy. Hubbard examines how modern monopolies rob Americans of a healthy food supply, the ability to care for the sick, and a habitable planet, because monopolies use business practices that deplete rather than generate. Monopolists also threaten fair elections, our free press, our privacy, and, ultimately, the American Dream, Hubbard shows. In Monopolies Suck, Hubbard reminds readers that antitrust enforcers already have the tools to dismantle corporate power and that decisive action must be taken before monopolies undermine our economy and democracy for generations to come. In Monopolies Suck, Sally provides an important new view of America’s monopoly crisis and of the political and economic harms of concentrated private power. Order your copy here [[link removed]].


We would love to hear from you—just reply to this e-mail and drop us a line. Give us your feedback, alert us to competition policy news, or let us know your favorite story from this issue.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER [[link removed]] DONATE [[link removed]] Share [link removed] Tweet [link removed] Share [[link removed]] Forward [link removed] Open Markets Institute

1440 G St NW, Washington, DC xxxxxx

We thought you'd like to be in the know about competition policy news. Liked what you read? Please forward to a friend or colleague.

Written and edited by: Barry C. Lynn, Phil Longman, LaRonda Peterson, Jackie Filson, Daniel A. Hanley, Garphil Julien, Anna Brugmann, Ray Garcia, and Ezmeralda Makhamreh.

Preferences [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis