This month's edition rounds-up the November elections using ranked-choice voting + an update on redistricting in North Carolina
------------------------------------------------------------
SPONSORED BY PROBOLSKY RESEARCH ([link removed])

_WELCOME TO THE BALLOT BULLETIN: _We track developments in election policy at the federal, state, and local levels. Each issue includes an in-depth feature—such as an interview or legislative analysis—and discussions of recent events relating to electoral and primary systems, redistricting, and voting provisions. Have a question/feedback/or just want to say hello? Respond to this email, or drop me a line directly at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) .

Today at 11 a.m. Central, we're hosting a discussion on redistricting featuring our Managing Editor Cory Eucalitto and News Editor Dave Beaudoin. Tomorrow we will send out a recording of the briefing to everyone who registered. You can register here ([link removed]) to join the call live or to get the recording tomorrow.

------------------------------------------------------------

 
** RANKED-CHOICE VOTING ROUND-UP: THE STATE OF PLAY HEADING INTO NOVEMBER
------------------------------------------------------------

On Nov. 5, voters in New York City will decide on a city charter amendment ([link removed]) that would, if adopted, establish ranked-choice voting ([link removed]) (RCV) for municipal primary and special elections beginning in 2021. If approved, the amendment will make New York the largest city in the nation to use RCV for local elections. 

 
** WHAT MUNICIPALITIES HAVE ENACTED, OR ARE SET TO ENACT, RCV IN 2019?
------------------------------------------------------------

The following cities either have used or will use RCV for the first time as part of their 2019 election cycles: Eastpointe, Michigan; Las Cruces, New Mexico; Payton, Utah;  St. Louis Park, Minnesota; and Vineyard, Utah.

 
** HOW MANY JURISDICTIONS HAVE ADOPTED RCV?
------------------------------------------------------------

On the map below, states shaded in blue and gold contain jurisdictions that have adopted RCV as part of their election processes. States shaded in yellow either have implemented or will implement RCV this year. States shaded in blue have adopted, but not yet implemented, RCV. To date, 21 jurisdictions (20 municipalities and one state, Maine) have adopted RCV and have either begun using it or are scheduled to begin using it in a coming election cycle. Another seven jurisdictions (six municipalities one state, Utah) have adopted legislation providing for the prospective use of RCV, although none mandate its use. 

 
** [link removed]

WHAT OTHER NOTEWORTHY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING RCV HAVE OCCURRED THIS YEAR?
------------------------------------------------------------

Maine is expected to use RCV in the 2020 presidential election, making it the first jurisdiction to do so. On Sept. 6, Maine Governor Janet Mills (D) announced ([link removed]) she would take no immediate action on legislation providing for the use of RCV in presidential elections. Instead, Mills signaled she would allow LD1083 ([link removed]) to become law without her signature in January. As a result, the law will not take effect in time for the March 3 primaries, but it will be in effect for the 2020 general election. 

According to FairVote, a group that advocates for the expanded use of RCV, the following presidential preference primaries and nominating caucuses will incorporate RCV in 2020: 

* Nevada: Early voters in Democratic caucuses in February 2020  
* Hawaii: All voters in Democratic primary in April 2020
* Alaska: All voters in Democratic primary in April 2020  
* Kansas: All voters in Democratic primary in May 2020
* Wyoming: All voters in Democratic primary in April 2020

------------------------------------------------------------

[link removed]

------------------------------------------------------------

 
** REDISTRICTING IN NORTH CAROLINA: LITIGATION UPDATE
------------------------------------------------------------

On Sept. 27, a group of 14 registered Democratic voters in North Carolina filed a suit ([link removed]) in state superior court alleging that the state’s congressional district plan is an illegal partisan gerrymander under the state constitution. 

This lawsuit comes after a three-judge panel of the state superior court struck down North Carolina’s state legislative district plan for impermissible partisan gerrymandering. In that ruling ([link removed]) , handed down on September 3, the court held that the maps “do not permit voters to freely choose their representative, but rather representatives are choosing voters based upon sophisticated partisan sorting. It is not the free will of the people that is fairly ascertained through extreme partisan gerrymandering. Rather, it is the carefully crafted will of the map drawer that predominates." The court ordered lawmakers to draft remedial maps.

On Sept. 17, one day before the court-mandated deadline, the state legislature adopted remedial House and Senate maps and submitted them to the court. The remedial House map can be accessed here ([link removed]) . The remedial Senate map can be accessed here ([link removed]) . In a court filing dated Sept. 27, the plaintiffs in the original suit objected ([link removed]) to 19 remedial state House districts. They did not object to any of the remedial state Senate maps. On Oct. 4, attorneys for Republican lawmakers submitted a brief in response to these claims. The court has yet to rule on the viability of the remedial maps. 

------------------------------------------------------------

 
** LEGISLATION UPDATE: REDISTRICTING, ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, AND PRIMARY SYSTEMS BILLS  
------------------------------------------------------------

The maps below show which states are considering redistricting, electoral systems, and primary systems legislation. A darker shade of red indicates a greater number of relevant bills. 

 
** REDISTRICTING LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES, 2019 ([link removed])  
------------------------------------------------------------

 
** CURRENT AS OF. OCT. 8, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------

[link removed]

 
** ELECTORAL SYSTEMS LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES, 2019 ([link removed])  
------------------------------------------------------------

 
** CURRENT AS OF OCT. 8, 2019
[link removed]
------------------------------------------------------------

 
** PRIMARY SYSTEMS LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES, 2019 ([link removed])  
------------------------------------------------------------

 
** CURRENT AS OF OCT.8, 2019
[link removed]
------------------------------------------------------------

 

------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]

Want to sponsor a Ballotpedia newsletter? Reach donors, consultants, activists, and voters with your message. Contact [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])  for more information about advertising.
------------------------------------------------------------

BALLOTPEDIA DEPENDS ON THE SUPPORT OF OUR READERS.

The Lucy Burns Institute, publisher of Ballotpedia, is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All donations are tax deductible to the extent of the law. Donations to the Lucy Burns Institute or Ballotpedia do not support any candidates or campaigns.
 

Click here to support our work ([link removed])
 
------------------------------------------------------------

Decide which emails you want from Ballotpedia.
Unsubscribe from all emails [link removed]  or update your subscription preferences [link removed]

Ballotpedia
The Encyclopedia of American Politics
8383 Greenway Blvd., Suite 600Middleton, WI 53562 ([link removed])

============================================================

** [Facebook] ([link removed])

  ** [Twitter] ([link removed])