It’s been a busy month here at the Energy Choice Coalition, so I am as happy for the arrival of the long Memorial Day weekend as anyone. It may be the first holiday for many people to see friends and family after more than a year of isolation at home because of the pandemic. I hope those reunions are joyous. I hope you will also take a moment on Monday to remember those men and women who could not be reunited with their loved ones because they made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation. They deserve to be honored and their families deserve our respect and appreciation. In this month’s newsletter, we look at the growing catalog of bad behavior by monopoly utilities, which includes lots of new media coverage of the ongoing fallout in Ohio from the 2020 bribery scandal related to the now-repealed House Bill 6. The scandal may eventually cost Ohio Rep. Larry Householder, the former Speaker of the House, his seat. Two resolutions calling for his ouster were introduced this week. We have the latest on the FirstEnergy bribery scandal below and will be keeping tabs on it in the weeks to come. We are also watching a new bill – HB 317 – introduced in the Ohio House by Rep. Shane Wilkin for potential chicanery. Landon Stevens and Mark Pischea over at Conservatives Energy Network have a great commentary on the playbook of dirty tricks used by monopoly utilities to keep competitors at bay. A snippet of their editorial is below with a link to the full piece. One would think all this attention on utility corruption would be a sufficient incentive for the monopolies to clean up their act. Some folks never learn, though. In North Carolina, Duke Energy is accused of standing up a dark money front group to fight a legislative effort to create a study commission to look at competitive reforms. Not an actual reform bill, mind you, just a study committee. Is energy choice really all that scary to monopolies? We hope so. What can we expect from the same people that were part of the utility cabal that thought up the Southeast Energy Exchange Market Agreement, which SEEMs like a competitive market but isn’t. FERC called the proposal “deficient.” Deceptive is probably a better word, but why quibble. Southeast states continuously have some of the highest electricity bills in the nation. It’s no coincidence that those same states remain locked in outdated monopoly markets that offer consumers little choice of where to purchase their power. SEEM is designed to sideline independent and small developers and allow the region’s big incumbent utilities to keep on doing business as they have for decades – buying political access and passing the cost on to ratepayers. Thank you for supporting the effort to expand competitive market reforms and spread energy freedom from sea to shining sea. Have a wonderful and safe holiday weekend. |