Judicial Watch Sues Pentagon and Park
Police over Jan. 6 Capitol Deployment
Nancy Pelosi wants to set up a commission to continue the
politicization of events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, saying
that those who oppose her “are afraid of the truth.”
That’s laughable. Getting to the truth is our specialty, and so we filed
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suits against the Department of the
Interior and the Department of Defense for records regarding the deployment
of armed forces around the Capitol complex in Washington, D.C., in January
and February of 2021 ( Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Department of the Interior (No. 1:21-cv-01302))
and ( Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Department of Defense (No. 1:21-cv-01301)).
Who needs a “commission” when you have trusty Judicial Watch!
We sued here in DC after the Department of Defense failed to reply to our
February 19, 2021, FOIA request for:
All emails regarding the deployment of U.S. troops around the Capitol
complex in Washington, D.C. sent to and from Secretary of Defense Lloyd
Austin, Deputy Secretary Kathleen H. Hicks, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark
A. Milley, and/or Vice Chairman Gen. John E. Hyten.
We’re interested in emails sent between January 6, 2021, and
February 19, 2021.
We sued the Department of the Interior after the U.S. Park Police, one
of its components, failed to reply to a March 18, 2021, FOIA
request for:
All records of communications, including emails and text messages, between
officials of the U.S. Park Police and officials of the Washington, D.C.
Metropolitan Police Department regarding the Jan. 6, 2021 pro-Trump rally
and/or protest at the Capitol Building.
All records of communications, including emails and text messages, between
officials of the U.S. Park Police and officials of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation regarding the Jan. 6, 2021 pro-Trump rally and/or protest at
the Capitol Building.
All records of communications, including emails and text messages, between
officials of the U.S. Park Police and officials of the U.S. Capitol Police
regarding the Jan. 6, 2021 pro-Trump rally and/or protest at the Capitol
Building.
All records of communications, including emails and text messages, between
officials of the U.S. Park Police and officials of the offices of the House
and Senate Sergeants-at-Arms regarding the Jan. 6, 2021 pro-Trump rally
and/or protest at the Capitol Building.
All intelligence reports, memoranda, updates, and warnings received by the
U.S. Park Police regarding the Jan. 6, 2021 pro-Trump rally and/or protest
at the Capitol Building.
The timeframe for this request is December 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021.
We are deeply troubled that the U.S. Park Police and the Pentagon are
suppressing the many unknown facts surrounding the January 6 incident at
the U.S. Capitol. With those emotionally charged events shaping the
political landscape, it is critical that the American people have a full
account of the facts. It is disturbing that we must take the two government
agencies to federal court for this basic information.
We filed several lawsuits previously regarding the January 6
incident.
- In March 2021, we filed suit against the U.S. Department of
Defense for records about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s January 8, 2021,
telephone call with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark
Milley.
- Pressure from a March 2021 Judicial Watch lawsuit helped
bring to light that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick died
of natural causes.
- In February 2021, we announced a lawsuit against the Capitol
Police for emails and video related to the January 6 riot.
If Ms. Pelosi wants the truth, she can follow developments in these
lawsuits. In the meantime, as I told Newsmax
this week, you should be very concerned that any Pelosi commission will be
used to target and abuse any and all Americans who oppose the radical left
agenda.
Students Taught that ‘Make America Great Again’ Is ‘Covert
White Supremacy’
You need to be concerned about our public schools. Maryland shows us why.
We received 685
pages of heavily redacted records from Montgomery County Public
Schools (MCPS), including documents related to their “Anti-racist system
audit” and critical race theory classes.
The documents, obtained under the Maryland
Public Information Act, reveal that students of “Maryland’s
Largest School District” who attended Thomas Pyle Middle School’s
social justice class were taught that the phrase “Make America Great
Again” was an example of “covert white supremacy.” The phrase is
ranked on a pyramid just below, “lynching,” “hate crimes,” “the
N-word” and “racial slurs.” They were also taught that “white
privilege” means being favored by school authorities and having a
positive relationship with the police.
Additionally, the documents
show that Montgomery County Public Schools allocated over $454,000
for an “Anti-racist system audit” by The Mid-Atlantic Equity
Consortium, a company that claims that their “expertise in using
intersectionality as part of its theory of change makes us uniquely
positioned to conduct the Anti-Racist Audit and mitigate the root causes of
systemic barriers.”
In Thomas Pyle Middle School’s “social justice” class course
curriculum, there is a slide titled “ What
is systemic racism?” in which students are shown a pyramid slide
depicting “Differences between overt and covert hateful white
supremacy.” According to the pyramid, “Make America Great Again” is
an example of “covert white supremacy.” The phrase is ranked on a
pyramid just below “racial slurs.”
Examples of other “white supremacy” include thinking “but we’re
just one human family,” “colorblindness,” “cultural
appropriation,” “celebration of Columbus Day,” “police murdering
POC [people of color],” and “bootstrap theory.”
A separate pyramid begins with the term “ genocide.”
The documents include Mid-Atlantic Equity Consortium’s “anti-racist
system audit” proposal,
which describes intersectional theory as “people are often disadvantaged
by multiple sources of oppression: their race, class, gender identity,
native language, sexual orientation, religion, and other identity markers.
Intersectionality recognizes that identity markers (e.g. “female” and
“Black”) do not exist independently of each other, and that each
informs the others, often creating a complex merging of oppression.”
Records regarding Montgomery County Public School’s Thomas Pyle Middle
School’s social justice class include a cover letter, noting that the
class in question was a one-week “Summer Boost” class called “Reading
and Taking Action for Social Justice” offered from July 13-17, 2020, and
that “no grades were given and no actual work due.” The class
material includes a push for students to fill out a form letter with
contact information addressed to federal, state and county education
officials asking for more critical race theory classes in schools.
In a slide titled “ What
is Intersectionality?” the students are told it is defined as:
Exposing [one’s] multiple identities can help clarify the ways in which a
person can simultaneously experience privilege and oppression….
Per [ critical
race theory scholar] Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, ‘Intersectionality
is simply a prism to see the Interactive effects of various forms of
discrimination and disempowerment. It looks at the way that racism, many
times, interacts with patriarchy, heterosexism, classism, xenophobia –
seeing that the overlapping vulnerabilities created by these systems
actually create specific kinds of challenges.’
A class slide titled “Implicit Bias, Structural Racism”
states:
Race is created to justify enslaving people from Africa (the economic
engine of the country).
National narrative (ideology, belief system) about people of color being
‘less than’ human (and less than white) justifies mistreatment and
inequality (white supremacy).
Dominant narratives about race (family, media, society) coupled with
racialized structural arrangements and differential outcomes by race all
prime us to believe that people of color are inferior to white people
…
The students are asked: “ What
is White Privilege?” and are instructed that white privilege
includes, among other things: having “a positive relationship with the
police, generally;” “soaking in media blatantly biased toward my
race;” and “living ignorant of the dire state of racism today.”
The students are suggested to view a Ted Talk interview with Patrisse
Cullors, a founder of Black Lives Matter. The class is provided
“definitions” created by www.racialequitytools.org. The terms that
are defined include:
- “Black Lives Matter,” which is defined as “A political movement
to address systemic and state violence against African Americans.” It
claims that “Black Lives Matter is an ideological and political
intervention in a world where Black lives are systematically and
intentionally targeted for demise.”
- “Power,” defined among other things as: “Wealth, whiteness,
citizenship, patriarchy, heterosexism, and education are a few key social
mechanisms through which power operates.”
- “Racist policies,” is defined with the statement, “There is no
such thing as a nonracist or race-neutral policy.”
- “White Privilege,” which is defined as “to the unquestioned and
unearned set of advantages, entitlements, benefits and choices bestowed on
people solely because they are white.” And “Structure white
privilege” is described as “A system of white domination that creates
and maintains belief systems that make current racial advantages and
disadvantages seem normal.”
- Under the heading “White Supremacy,” “White supremacy
culture,” is defined as referring, “to the dominant, unquestioned
standards of behavior and ways of functioning embodied by the vast majority
of institutions in the United States.” White supremacy culture is further
defined as “the glue that binds together white-controlled institutions
into systems and white-controlled systems into the global white supremacy
system.”
- Other defined terms include: “Anti-black” “colonization”
“racial recognition” “racialization” “structural racism” and
“whiteness”
We also received records relating
to Montgomery County Public School’s Greenwood Elementary School’s
“Dual Pandemic” of “Covid-19/systemic racism” class
presentation.
The racist, revolutionary claptrap in these documents should be nowhere
near a school classroom. These documents show that extremists have access
to our schools and are willing to abuse this access to children in order to
advance a dangerous, divisive, and likely illegal agenda.
Florida County Gives Illegal Immigrants Special IDs to Get
Vaccines, Public Services
Leftist public officials show contempt for the rule of law when they
promote sanctuary policies to aid and abet the continued presence of
illegal aliens. The latest example comes in Florida, as our Corruption
Chronicles blog reports.
Florida’s second-most populous county is the state’s first to offer
illegal immigrants identification cards so they can obtain taxpayer-funded
services, including COVID-19 vaccines. Elected officials in Broward County,
situated in southeast Florida with a population of about two million,
unanimously passed the measure with ardent support from the county’s top
law enforcement officer, Sheriff Gregory Tony. Republican Governor Ron
DeSantis appointed Tony to the elected position after suspending former
Broward Sheriff Scott Israel for mishandling the 2018 shooting at Marjory
Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland.
Tony won his first election in November to remain the county’s top cop.
In a social media post published by local news outlets Tony thanked
Broward County. “Together, we did this. I look forward to leading the
great & hard-working people at the Broward Sheriff’s Office over the next
four years as we continue to make BSO the finest law enforcement agency in
Florida and an example of excellence for the nation,” Tony wrote. The
sheriff fully backs the new ID cards for illegal immigrants and says they
will have a positive impact on public safety, according to a local news
report. Tony even wrote a letter of support to the Broward County
commissioner who introduced the legislation to create the special IDs for
those in the country illegally. This may seem strange considering he
runs Florida’s
largest sheriff’s department with 5,400 employees, including nearly 3,000
certified deputies. “Today, Broward County has thousands of residents who
lack identification for various reasons,” Sheriff Tony’s letter to the
commissioner reads. “With the homeless, undocumented, formerly
incarcerated, to elderly, these and other bureaucratically-challenged
residents do not have access to many basic and vital services. The
community ID will provide these residents with a way to access those
services.”
Support for the special IDs from the top law enforcement official in one of
its largest counties is at odds with the state’s typically strong stance
on illegal immigration. Florida is not one of the nation’s 11 states to
offer illegal aliens sanctuary and no local government in the Sunshine
state officially provides it either, though some have toyed with idea.
Florida has also resisted a nationwide movement to provide illegal
immigrants with driver’s licenses. Sixteen states along with the District
of Columbia offer illegal immigrants driver’s licenses, according to the
National
Conference of State Legislatures. Among the states are California, New
York, Oregon, Nevada, Vermont, Washington State and Connecticut. In 2020
Virginia became the latest to grant illegal aliens driving privileges. Many
open borders groups have expressed concern that the information on the
licenses will be shared with federal authorities.
To protect the privacy of illegal immigrants Broward County will not issue
the special IDs, but rather a nonprofit will carry out the task to avoid
potential public records requests. Technically the cards are called
“community IDs” and a third-party issues them with the approval of
local governments. It allows the personal information of recipients to be
kept private because nonprofits typically do not have to comply with public
records laws like cities, counties, states, and other taxpayer-funded
entities. The Broward County community IDs will be issued by Legal
Aid Service of Broward County, a group that provides free legal advice
and representation to the county’s “disadvantaged,” including illegal
immigrants. The group helps improve the lifestyle and living conditions in
low-income communities and encourages self-sufficiency, according to its
website.
It is not clear how Legal Aid was chosen to administer Broward County’s
new ID cards, but the measure to do so was passed after a “months-long
campaign of advocacy and outreach by a diverse coalition of community
organizations,” a local news
article reveals. Predictably, the groups advocate for open borders
and rights for illegal aliens. They include United We Dream, Florida
Immigrant Coalition, Hispanic Unity of Florida, and the Southern Poverty
Law Center (SPLC). It is noteworthy to mention that the SPLC is a radical
leftist nonprofit that lists conservative organizations that disagree with
it on social issues on a catalog of “hate groups.” Its famous “hate
map” helped a gunman commit an act of terrorism against a conservative
nonprofit in 2012. The Virginia man, Floyd
Lee Corkins, was sentenced to 25 years in prison though prosecutors
recommended 45 because his crime was an act of terrorism. Even the Obama
Department of Justice (DOJ) officially reprimanded the SPLC for its hateful
attacks, documents obtained
by Judicial Watch show.
Rising Crime, Radical Agenda Test Left
It’s been said that as New York City goes, so goes the nation. That would
be tragic. These days, New York City is a radical sandbox that results in
policies that threaten the safety and welfare of law-abiding citizens.
Micah Morrison, our chief investigative reporter, has a revealing update
in Judicial Watch’s Investigative Bulletin:
With weeks to go to elections that will decide New York City’s next mayor
and the powerful post of Manhattan district attorney, rising crime suddenly
is at the center of the political action. The stakes are high—and not
just for New York.
The proximate cause for the sudden focus on crime was a shooting in the
heart of the city—a gunman let loose with a
fusillade in Times Square, wounding a 4-year-old girl, a woman from New
Jersey, and a tourist from Rhode Island. But that was just gas on the
bonfire. Judicial Watch followers are familiar with the grim litany
of rising
crime statistics in New York and across urban America.
“As of May 2,” the New York Times reported, “132 people have been
killed compared with 113 this same time last year, a 17 percent increase,
according to Police Department statistics. There have been 416 shooting
incidents compared with 227 this time last year, an 83 percent
increase.” Violent
subway crimes rattle the city. Hate crimes continue to
rise.
Rising crime poses a big problem for the Left, which nationwide has pushed
hard on criminal-justice issues with calls to defund the police and empty
the jails. In New York, a draft platform from a coalition of radical
left-wing groups, obtained
by Judicial Watch, suggests the scope of the Left’s national
agenda.
The crowded New York mayoral and DA races are Democratic Party primaries
that will be decided June 22 in a city dominated by Democrats, effectively
anointing the winners. Both races have tacked sharply to the left, with
most of the DA candidates backing most of the radical platform, and the
mayoral candidates echoing its themes.
The platform calls for defunding the Manhattan DA’s office, sharp
reductions in charging and sentencing discretion, curtailing gang
prosecutions and intelligence gathering, ending support for
police-sponsored community programs, declining disorderly conduct
prosecutions, and stopping pre-trial detention.
It’s class war on the criminal justice system. The platform calls for a
fifty percent reduction in the district attorney’s budget because “for
too long” the office “has worked to extract wealth from the targets of
policing and incarceration.” It says that the DA “continues to pursue
overzealous charges and excessive sentences” and that there must be a
commitment to “reducing the power of the office.”
The attack on the office of district attorney is an attack on policing as
well. The DA’s office, the draft platform says, “is heavily intertwined
with and dependent on other law enforcement entities, including the
NYPD.” Charging of violent offenders must be changed because “the label
‘violent’…is applied in arbitrary, biased, and harmful ways that do
nothing to address the root causes of violence.” Gang prosecutions must
be ended because the “cases have been built through close collaboration
with the NYPD as it has expanded its racist and controversial gang
database.”
Gang violence, by the way, is widely identified as a central cause of
shootings and killings in New York. And recent
state legislation already has sharply reduced jail
populations.
But lately it seems that urban America is tiring of rising crime and
disorder. The public mood appears to be shifting. In a recent New
York poll,
crime placed second in public concern, after Covid-19.
In recent years, the criminal-justice reform movement, backed by the
George Soros network, has made powerful gains around the country.
Left-wing district attorneys are now installed in Chicago, Boston, San
Francisco, Philadelphia, and other cities. The New York races, while
dominated by the city’s noisy progressive factions, feature a handful of
relative moderates, such as mayoral candidate Eric Adams and DA contender
Tali Farhadian Weinstein, who have pushed back against the Left’s
excesses. Polling is sparse, but both seem to be gaining ground. Read more
about the races here and here.
Victory for any moderate would signal that the public pushback against
rising crime is gaining traction. Victory for any of the other candidates
would signal something entirely different—that the leftward march in
American cities continues.
Until next week …
|