21 May 2021 | Full Fact's weekly news
 FACT CHECK 
Ministers create confusion over foreign holidays and 'amber list' countries
On Monday, Transport Secretary Grant Shapps officially scrapped the Government’s guidance to “stay in the UK,” officially replacing it with a new “traffic light system”.

Twelve countries made it onto the “green list”—meaning returning travellers to England will not be required to quarantine on arrival—while travel to “red list” countries has been discouraged.

But the public were left in the dark about whether travel to the remaining “amber list” countries was permitted, after a series of Government ministers gave conflicting advice.

During Prime Ministers’ Questions, Boris Johnson said people “should not be going to an amber list country except for some extreme circumstance,” but the previous day Simon Hart, the Welsh secretary, suggested that going on holiday could qualify as “essential travel.”

Environment Secretary George Eustice told people they could travel to amber list countries as long as they observe quarantine upon their return, while junior minister Gillian Keegan said it was a matter of "personal responsibility".

No travel from England is currently banned or illegal, but a holiday does not count as essential under the current government guidance.

On this week’s episode of the Full Fact podcast, we discuss the Government’s record of communication during the pandemic, and why we all deserve clear, consistent information—especially in an emergency:
The Full Fact Podcast: new episode out today

We all deserve good information so we can make informed decisions. This has never been more true than during a pandemic.

It’s not only harmful when the Government and politicians make false claims, but also when they issue unclear, inconsistent and confusing messaging.

We can only find and expose these incidents because of our community of supporters, whose regular donations allow us to deliver good, reliable information to people when they need it most.

With our politicians failing to give us clear information about the pandemic, can you help make sure people get the accuracy they deserve?

I’ll chip in £10
I’ll become a regular supporter
FACT CHECK
Scammers use fake reports of a missing child to target Facebook users

Claims that a girl called Ellie Morrad has gone missing in the UK have been spreading rapidly on Facebook this week.

But these reports are fake. One post says she went missing in St Neots, Cambridgeshire. But another says she went missing in Porthmadog in north west Wales. 

The photo accompanying both posts is not of Ellie Morrad but of a girl from Ohio, in the United States, who went missing and was found late last year. This girl is not named Ellie Morrad.

This is the latest in a series of fake missing children reports on Facebook, which are designed to scam people. 

Previous posts have been used to collect personal details from victims in schemes known as “phishing scams”. 

These latest posts link to web pages which have been flagged by Google as “deceptive”. On clicking through, the pages display 404 error messages.

What are phishing scams?
JOIN THE TEAM
New jobs at Full Fact

We’re recruiting for three new and exciting roles in our Policy and Advocacy team:

If interested, please apply before 10am this Tuesday (25 May)

Work with us
FACT CHECK
Claims about teeth whitening inquiries don’t add up

Last weekend, the Mail on Sunday, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People all reported that Londoners were the “most likely” people in the country to search for teeth whitening treatments. 

But each publication made a crucial error in its reporting.

The figures used do not adjust for population. And so it’s unsurprising that London—by far the most populous city in the country—would account for the highest number of search enquiries about teeth whitening.

But that does not mean that Londoners are more likely to enquire about teeth whitening than people elsewhere in the country.

The Sunday Mirror and Sunday People shared their data with Full Fact.

The findings—which came from a US dental company called Express Dentist—were indeed based on raw “average monthly search results”, rather than a measure which controlled for population size.

Always check the data
MORE FACT CHECKS
Also this week...
Read our latest fact checks
Stop the spread of bad information

Find these updates useful? We'd be incredibly grateful if you could share our fact checks and help more people access good information.

Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Forward Forward
Share Share
All the best,
Team Full Fact

 
Follow us
Donate
Like us
Follow us
Have any questions or feedback? Please get in touch via our contact form. We do not respond to direct replies to this email address.

Find out how Full Fact is funded.

Copyright © Full Fact 2021 - All rights reserved

A registered charity (no. 1158683) and a non-profit company (no. 6975984) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.

Our mailing address is:
2 Carlton Gardens, London, SW1Y 5AA

We use Mailchimp to send you our emails and to see which articles are most popular. Read our privacy policy or Mailchimp's privacy policy

unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences