“Don’t give them the money in the first place.”

At your request: This week's California Commentary by Jon Coupal
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redlandsdailyfacts.com%2F2021%2F05%2F16%2Fsurplus-is-the-result-of-too-high-taxes%2F Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redlandsdailyfacts.com%2F2021%2F05%2F16%2Fsurplus-is-the-result-of-too-high-taxes%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
[link removed]

[link removed]


** California Commentary
------------------------------------------------------------

You are receiving this email because you subscribed on the HJTA website, or you provided your address in response to direct mail. Please see the bottom of this message to unsubscribe.


** 'TEL' me no lies
------------------------------------------------------------

By Jon Coupal

Beginning in the 1970s, voters across the United States began revolting against excessive taxation and, by way of direct democracy or heavy pressure on their respective state legislatures, they achieved some success by enacting new laws.

These laws aimed at enforcing fiscal restraint are sometimes referred to as TELs, or “tax and expenditure limitations.” According to the Tax Policy Center, as of 2020, 33 states had at least one kind of TEL.

TELs come in many forms. They include direct limitations on specific taxes, limitations on increases in government spending, vote threshold requirements or a combination of all three. It is no surprise that TELs imposed by voters directly, either through constitutional amendments or by statutory initiatives, are usually more restrictive than TELs enacted by legislative bodies.

Although America has always had laws limiting governments’ power to impose taxes, the sea change came in 1978 with the passage of California’s own Proposition 13. That set off a nationwide push for TELs.

Just one year after Proposition 13, California voters approved another TEL called the Gann Spending Limit. Its approach was very different from the direct tax limitations imposed by Prop. 13. The intent of the Gann Limit was to cap the growth of government spending, adjusted only for increases in population and inflation. It sought to accomplish this by establishing a spending limit based on 1978-79 spending, determining what appropriations would be subject to the limit, estimating “proceeds of taxes” from all state sources, and then subtracting certain exclusions.

Yes, it’s complicated. And it doesn’t get any less complicated when one considers that the Gann spending limit was substantially weakened by Proposition 98 in 1988 and Proposition 111 in 1990, which carved out exceptions for education and transportation spending, respectively, as well as substituting a far more generous inflation factor. Ironically, after Gann was weakened, most public finance observers assumed that California would never bump up against the limit again. We assumed incorrectly.

To read the entire column, please click here ([link removed]) .
Click here to listen to this week's Howard Jarvis Podcast, "Jackpot! Recall pays off for winning taxpayers" ([link removed]) The Howard Jarvis Podcast features HJTA President Jon Coupal and VP of Communications Susan Shelley with a lively conversation that takes you inside California government in a way that's fun, interesting and sometimes scary. Check out all the recent podcasts by clicking here: [link removed] -- it's easy to listen on your cell phone, tablet or computer. Just click the "play" arrow next to the title. Questions for Jon and Susan? Email us at [email protected] and tune in!
A note to our valued members and supporters: To increase the reach of our message to as many Californians as possible, HJTA made an agreement with the Southern California News Group papers to carry Jon Coupal's weekly column. The newspapers in the group, including the Orange County Register and the Los Angeles Daily News, have added a paywall that allows only a limited number of page views per month, and then asks readers to become subscribers. HJTA is not marketing these subscriptions or receiving any payment from them. The columns are exclusive to SCNG's papers for one week and then are posted in full on HJTA's own website, www.hjta.org ([link removed]) , under "California Commentaries," where you can read them at your convenience, or read Jon's column online in all the SCNG papers at these links:
www.whittierdailynews.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.dailybulletin.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.redlandsdailyfacts.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.sgvtribune.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.ocregister.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.pe.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.dailynews.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.pasadenastarnews.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.sbsun.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.dailybreeze.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.presstelegram.com/opinion ([link removed])
Jon Coupal is the President of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA). He is a recognized expert in California fiscal affairs and has argued numerous tax cases before the courts.
HJTA is totally dependent on the voluntary support of California taxpayers.
Please consider a donation now to help us continue our work on your behalf.
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Don't Forget To Follow Us On Social Media
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** Pinterest ([link removed])
** Pinterest ([link removed])

Copyright © 2021 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. All rights reserved.
621 S. Westmoreland Avenue, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90005

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association . 621 South Westmoreland Avenue, Suite 200 . Los Angeles, CA 90005 . USA