“We are concerned that the surge of migrants seeking to take
advantage of the Biden administration’s lax immigration policies has
resulted in the foreseeable abuse of children, as overwhelmed federal
authorities are ill-equipped to handle the huge number of children crossing
the border.
|
|
Because no one is above
the law! |
May 10, 2021 |
|
|
|
Today's Top Stories
|
|
|
Judicial Watch Sues for Records about Abuse of Children
Tied to Biden Border Crisis
“We are concerned that the
surge of migrants seeking to take advantage of the Biden administration’s
lax immigration policies has resulted in the foreseeable abuse of children,
as overwhelmed federal authorities are ill-equipped to handle the huge
number of children crossing the border. The unprecedented secrecy and
censorship surrounding these sites compounds the problem and limits
accountability,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Our lawsuit
aims to expose the full truth about this particularly troubling consequence
of the Biden administration’s lawlessness on immigration.”
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judicial Watch Statement on Facebook Oversight
Board’s Decision to Support the Censorship of President Donald
Trump
Judicial Watch had argued that
Facebook’s Oversight Board should have reversed the president’s ban
because the ban is an affront to First Amendment protections of free
speech, peaceable assembly, and the right to petition the government. There
is no credible evidence that President Trump either morally or legally
incited violence. He was resoundingly acquitted by the United States Senate
after the impeachment “prosecutors” failed to produce credible evidence
he incited violence. For Facebook and its Oversight Board to suggest
President Trump incited violence and that complaints about the
administration of an election could incite violence is a political position
aligned with the Left and political opponents of President Trump and his
supporters.
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Big Tech Censorship & Government Collusion: Judicial
Watch Reveals Secret History of 2020 Election
In California, we obtained more
than 500 pages of documents showing how a state agency, the Office of
Election Cybersecurity, tracked social media commentary and pushed Big Tech
to take down posts. Included in the documents were so-called
“Misinformation Daily Briefings” from the communications firm SKDK. The
firm also was deeply involved in the Biden presidential campaign,
developing its mail-in voting program for four key electoral states:
Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona.
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judicial
Watch: Records Show Iowa State Officials Coordinated with Big Tech to
Censor Election Posts
Judicial Watch
Judicial
Watch received the records as a result of a June 2020 Iowa Open
Records lawsuit that was filed after the Iowa Secretary of State
failed to comply with a February 2020 request for records and
communications about a Judicial Watch report regarding the
accuracy of the state’s voter registration rolls (Judicial
Watch v. Iowa Secretary of State (No. 05771 EQCE085973)). Judicial
Watch was represented by Iowa lawyer Alan R. Ostergren of Des
Moines, Iowa.
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep our investigators on the job uncovering the truth:
|
|
|
|
|
|