From Judicial Watch Tipsheet <[email protected]>
Subject Judicial Watch Sues for Records about Abuse of Children Tied to Biden Border Crisis
Date May 10, 2021 6:44 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
“We are concerned that the surge of migrants seeking to take
advantage of the Biden administration’s lax immigration policies has
resulted in the foreseeable abuse of children, as overwhelmed federal
authorities are ill-equipped to handle the huge number of children
crossing the border.
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌


[alt_text]

[*****]
Because no one is above the law!
May 10, 2021

TODAY'S TOP STORIES

[img]
[[link removed]]

JUDICIAL WATCH SUES FOR RECORDS ABOUT ABUSE OF CHILDREN TIED TO
BIDEN BORDER CRISIS
[[link removed]]
“We are concerned that the surge of migrants seeking to take
advantage of the Biden administration’s lax immigration policies has
resulted in the foreseeable abuse of children, as overwhelmed federal
authorities are ill-equipped to handle the huge number of children
crossing the border. The unprecedented secrecy and censorship
surrounding these sites compounds the problem and limits
accountability,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Our
lawsuit aims to expose the full truth about this particularly
troubling consequence of the Biden administration’s lawlessness on
immigration.”
READ MORE
[[link removed]]


[img]
[[link removed]]

JUDICIAL WATCH STATEMENT ON FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT BOARD’S DECISION
TO SUPPORT THE CENSORSHIP OF PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP
[[link removed]]
Judicial Watch had argued that Facebook’s Oversight Board should
have reversed the president’s ban because the ban is an affront to
First Amendment protections of free speech, peaceable assembly, and
the right to petition the government. There is no credible evidence
that President Trump either morally or legally incited violence. He
was resoundingly acquitted by the United States Senate after the
impeachment “prosecutors” failed to produce credible evidence he
incited violence. For Facebook and its Oversight Board to suggest
President Trump incited violence and that complaints about the
administration of an election could incite violence is a political
position aligned with the Left and political opponents of President
Trump and his supporters.
READ MORE
[[link removed]]


[img]
[[link removed]]

BIG TECH CENSORSHIP & GOVERNMENT COLLUSION: JUDICIAL WATCH REVEALS
SECRET HISTORY OF 2020 ELECTION
[[link removed]]
In California, we obtained more than 500 pages of documents showing
how a state agency, the Office of Election Cybersecurity, tracked
social media commentary and pushed Big Tech to take down posts.
Included in the documents were so-called “Misinformation Daily
Briefings” from the communications firm SKDK. The firm also was
deeply involved in the Biden presidential campaign, developing its
mail-in voting program for four key electoral states: Pennsylvania,
Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona.
READ MORE
[[link removed]]


[img]
[[link removed]]

JUDICIAL WATCH FILES LAWSUIT AGAINST SECRET SERVICE FOR RECORDS OF
BIDEN WHITE HOUSE DOGS AFTER BITING INCIDENTS
[[link removed]]
Judicial Watch announced recently that it filed a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the United States Department of
Homeland Security for records of communication between Secret Service
officials assigned to the White House regarding the Biden family dogs.
READ MORE
[[link removed]]


[---]

[Must Read]

JUDICIAL WATCH’S FITTON ON DURHAM INVESTIGATION: ‘I DON’T KNOW
WHAT WE’RE SPENDING THE MONEY ON’

Just the News
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said Thursday morning that he’s
no longer sure “what we’re spending the money on,”
regarding the long-awaited report and potential prosecutions from
Justice Department special counsel John Durham.

“It’s now been two-plus years, and we’ve had virtually zero
activity from Durham as best as anyone can see,” Fitton during
an appearance on “Just the News AM.”

READ MORE
[[link removed]]

JUDICIAL WATCH: RECORDS SHOW IOWA STATE OFFICIALS COORDINATED WITH BIG
TECH TO CENSOR ELECTION POSTS

Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch received the records as a result of a June 2020 Iowa
Open Records lawsuit that was filed after the Iowa Secretary of
State failed to comply with a February 2020 request for records and
communications about a Judicial Watch report regarding the accuracy
of the state’s voter registration rolls (Judicial Watch v. Iowa
Secretary of State (No. 05771 EQCE085973)). Judicial Watch was
represented by Iowa lawyer Alan R. Ostergren of Des Moines, Iowa.

READ MORE
[[link removed]]

MAJORGATE: WATCHDOG SUES SECRET SERVICE FOR INFORMATION ON BIDEN DOG
BITING

Washington Examiner
In its Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, Judicial Watch said it is
seeking from the Department of Homeland Security “records of
communication between Secret Service officials assigned to the White
House regarding the Biden family dogs.”

READ MORE
[[link removed]]

[---]

[Must Watch]

DO YOU SUPPORT TAXPAYER CASH FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS?

WATCH NOW
[[link removed]]

MOST OF FACEBOOK CENSORSHIP BOARD HAS TIES TO LEFTWING BILLIONAIRE
GEORGE SOROS

WATCH NOW
[[link removed]]

BREAKING: DOCS SHOW CA & BIG TECH CENSORED AMERICANS’ ELECTION
POSTS!

WATCH NOW
[[link removed]]

[Must Read]

CLIPS

[--]
Special Counsel Probe for Biden Corruption NOW--And Where's Durham?

[--]
FRAUD! Facebook/Big Tech Lying About Censoring Trump and Conservatives
| Tom Fitton

[---]

[---]

[advertisement]
[[link removed]]


[---]

[advertisement]
[[link removed]]


[---]

[Judicial Watch]

Keep our investigators on the job uncovering the truth:

DONATE
[[link removed]]


[*****]

[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]
[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]


Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800, Washington, DC 20024
202.646.5172

©2017-2021, All Rights Reserved

Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
| Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis