Today’s the big day.
Facebook will announce whether or not Donald Trump’s ban from its platform will continue or be lifted. More on that in a moment.
After all, it might not even matter. Trump has decided to start his own website.
Then again, it’s not exactly Facebook.
In fact, it’s pretty basic stuff. Kind of like Twitter for One. Or how about Only MySpace?
“From the Desk of Donald J. Trump” essentially allows Trump to communicate to his followers and, well, that’s about it. Fox News’ Brooke Singman broke the story and a source told her, “This is just a one-way communication. This system allows Trump to communicate with his followers.”
One-way communication is a good way to put it. Trump can post statements (i.e. tweets). He can post videos, including videos of himself talking to the camera. He can put up photos. He can do all these things — just like Facebook or Twitter. The big difference, however, is readers cannot respond to Trump’s posts or engage with other readers — at least for now.
However, readers can repost Trump’s messages to Facebook and Twitter.
Politico’s Nick Niedzwiadek wrote, “As such, they’re closer to a blog or collection of past news releases that many politicians have on their official websites than a true rival to the Big Tech giants Trump and his allies frequently rail against.”
In other words, I’m guessing Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey aren’t overly concerned about Trump cutting into their businesses.
Not long after Trump was banned by Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and others following the insurrection on Jan. 6, there were rumors that Trump was going to start his own social media site. And while this website allows Trump to scratch his itch of commenting anytime he feels like it, just like he used to tweet obsessively, it’s still pretty much just a rudimentary blog.
But, it should be noted that Trump adviser Jason Miller tweeted, “President Trump’s website is a great resource to find his latest statements and highlights from his first term in office, but this is not a new social media platform. We’ll have additional information coming on that front in the very near future.”
Whatever this is, you would guess his followers will play along with him. And I think the timing of the website’s launch is a preemptive move to save face should Facebook decide to extend his ban. Either way, Trump can say, “Who cares about Facebook? I got my own website.”
Now, about the Facebook ban. It’s anybody’s guess what will happen. Personally, and based on nothing but a gut feeling, I expect Facebook to allow Trump back in.
NPR’s Rachel Martin, Jason Breslow and Shannon Bond wrote, “The Trump case is the biggest test so far of the board’s legitimacy: whether it’s seen as independent from the company that created and funds it, or whether it’s seen as a cover to let Facebook duck responsibility. The decision is also expected to set a precedent for how Facebook will treat the accounts of other world leaders and politicians. And it could be a model for other tech platforms grappling with the question of control over free speech.”
Adam Conner, vice president of technology policy for the Center for American Progress, wrote for NBC News that “Trump’s Facebook account should never be reinstated because we know what he’d use it for.”
“In fact,” Conner wrote, “it first needs to recommend the permanent and formal suspension of Trump, to which Facebook should acquiesce. And then Facebook should move onto the necessary work of releasing a full set of data to the public about his platform activity, so that the American public can begin to understand the true scope of the damage he inflicted on our democracy using their platform.”
Taking a stand
If many Republicans are going to push the Big Lie — or refuse to push back against it — then why put them on TV? That’s what one prominent CNN anchor said on Tuesday.
During an appearance on Tuesday’s “New Day” on CNN, anchor Jake Tapper said he’s had it with anyone who perpetuates the idea that the election was stolen from Donald Trump or pushes any other conspiracy theories. He especially called out Reps. Kevin McCarthy of California and Steve Scalise of Louisiana.
“The lie about the election on its own is anti-democracy, and it is sowing seeds of ignorance in the populace, and obviously has the potential to incite violence,” Tapper said. “But beyond that … if you’re willing to lie about that, what are you not willing to lie about? And that’s where we are when it comes to the House Republican leadership, McCarthy and Scalise, and where we are with too many leaders of the Republican party. They’re not willing to tell their voters the truth. What does that say about them?”
Tapper said the country “needs a strong, thriving, healthy, fact-based Republican party” and that it’s important to have lawmakers from both sides of the aisle on TV to discuss policies that shape the country.
“We need those debates happening,” Tapper said. “But we can’t have those debates if one side of the argument is not willing to stick to standards and facts — for a whole host of reasons. One of them is, how am I supposed to believe anything they say? If they’re willing to lie about Joe Biden wanting to steal your hamburgers, and QAnon and the Big Lie about the election, what are they not willing to lie about? Why should I put any of them on TV?”
For the clip, check out Joe DePaolo’s story for Mediaite.
Yamiche Alcindor takes over “Washington Week”