The Washington Post, The New York Times and NBC News all issued corrections over the weekend after reporting that Rudy Giuliani had been directly warned by the FBI that he was the target of a Russian disinformation campaign. The stories ran in the aftermath of Giuliani’s Manhattan home and office being raided by the Justice Department last week.
The Post was the first outlet to report the story and now has this correction on its story:
An earlier version of this story, published Thursday, incorrectly reported that One America News was warned by the FBI that it was the target of a Russian influence operation. That version also said the FBI had provided a similar warning to Rudolph W. Giuliani, which he has since disputed. This version has been corrected to remove assertions that OAN and Giuliani received the warnings.
The Times wrote that it had confirmed the Post story then offered this correction:
An earlier version of this article misstated whether Rudolph W. Giuliani received a formal warning from the F.B.I. about Russian disinformation. Mr. Giuliani did not receive such a so-called defensive briefing.
NBC News also issued a rather lengthy online correction on its story, writing:
An earlier version of this article included an incorrect report that Rudolph Giuliani had received a defensive briefing from the FBI in 2019 warning him that he was being targeted by a Russian influence operation. The report was based on a source familiar with the matter, but a second source now says the briefing was only prepared for Giuliani and not delivered to him, in part over concerns it might complicate the criminal investigation of Giuliani. As a result, the premise and headline of the article below have been changed to reflect the corrected information.
All three news outlets partly based their stories on anonymous sources. There’s no question that this is a troubling look for all three, particularly in a political climate when conservatives — such as those who are likely to be Giuliani and Donald Trump supporters — believe the media has it out for them and cannot be trusted.
Over the weekend, Giuliani tweeted the Post and Times “must reveal their sources who lied.”
Of course, the Post and Times are not going to reveal those sources, but you would like to think there are (or have been) serious conversations going on inside the newsrooms of the Post and Times with high-level editors to talk about those sources and how this all went down.
CNN’s Oliver Darcy wrote, “The corrections are black eyes to the newsrooms which have aggressively reported on Giuliani's contacts with Ukrainians in his attempts to dig up dirt on then-presidential candidate Joe Biden.”
The errors made were not good, obviously, but at least all three outlets took responsibility and issued corrections.
Now, I can already hear critics of the media thinking I’m giving the Post, Times and NBC News a pass here. No, but I will say that I believe the Post, Times and NBC News are legitimate and reputable news outlets that are constantly striving to get it right. They likely are as upset about these corrections as anyone. After all, it’s their reputations that will take a hit over this.
From presidents to the ponies
Is there anything that NBC political analyst Steve Kornacki can’t do? NBC Sports threw Kornacki on its Kentucky Derby coverage and it turns out that Kornacki knows horses as well as he does the big board election maps.
Before the race, Kornacki picked Medina Spirit, who went off at 12-1 odds, to win. Which horse won? Medina Spirit. Of course!
In all, 10 NBC horse racing analysts made on-air predictions. Kornacki was the only one to pick the winner. And, he threw $100 on Medina Spirit, so he took home some extra dough, too.
As far as ratings for the Kentucky Derby, NBC Sports put out a statement Sunday that said preliminary numbers show the coverage will average about 15 million viewers. (Final numbers will come out Tuesday.)
The 15 million, NBC Sports notes, topped all award shows for the first time ever and was the most-watched show on NBC since the NFL playoffs back in January.
What’s in a name change?
CNN’s Brian Stelter interviewed New York Times editorial page editor Kathleen Kingsbury on Sunday and asked if changing the name of “op-eds” to “guest essays” had anything to do with some of the controversies involving the Times’ Opinion section last year, such as the editor James Bennet stepping down or Sen. Tom Cotton’s op-ed that drew intense pushback from staff or columnist Bari Weiss resigning from the section.
Kingsbury said no, that the change in name was long overdue.
Meanwhile, what is the role of an Opinion section these days?
Kingsbury told Stelter, “What we are trying to do every day — our news pages are showing the world as it is. Our opinion pages are really trying to tell our readers how the world can and, perhaps, should be.”
Good interview