AMP Weekly News Roundup
October 4, 2019
How the Trump regime is cracking down on US academic freedom — Middle East Eye (10/4/19)
This letter is deeply troubling, and academics and civil rights advocates have been quick to point out that it is reminiscent of the McCarthyist attacks on leftist academics at the height of the Cold War, with the witch hunt now targeting scholarship on Palestine and Islam generally. Additionally, it reveals that the Department of Education itself, rather than the consortium, is determined to impose its own ideological bias onto academic programmes. As the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) wrote in a statement: “Title VI does not, and cannot, authorize the government to require federal funding recipients to de-emphasize the ‘positive aspects of Islam’ to the Department’s satisfaction.
In Israel, ‘politics as usual’ means escalating Palestinian oppression — +972 Magazine (10/4/19)
There are many moments in Israeli-Palestinian history where landmark developments seem to change nothing and everything at the same time. Israel’s September election is one of them. While featuring many familiar and predictable patterns, the latest political contest has also exposed novel shifts that could significantly alter the conflict’s dynamics. Three key and interconnected trends that reflect this paradox can be drawn from the election, all of which present crucial strategic questions for the Palestinian struggle in the years ahead. There are many moments in Israeli-Palestinian history where landmark developments seem to change nothing and everything at the same time.
WATCH: AMP, Allies Hold Press Conference on One-Year Anniversary of Jamal Khashoggi's Murder (10/3/19)
AMP and movement partners call for #JusticeforJamal one year after Khashoggi’s murder. Statement by AMP Executive Director Dr. Osama Abu Irshaid.
Trump wants to shoot people in the legs. The United States’ closest ally already does that. — Mondoweiss (10/2/19)
That revelation was reported by the New York Times, as part of an excerpt from the forthcoming book Border Wars: Inside Trump’s Assault on Immigration by reporters Michael Shear and Julie Hirschfeld Davis. The book relies on interviews with dozens of Trump administration officials. According to the excerpt, Trump also indicated that he “wanted the [border] wall electrified, with spikes on top that could pierce human flesh” and floated the idea of a trench in front of the wall that contained alligators. When he was told these methods were illegal, he became aggravated. While this news has left many understandably shocked, it’s worth remembering that the policy of targeting people in the legs is already implemented by the United States’ closest ally.
UN report gives Israel free hand to smear BDS movement — Electronic Intifada (10/1/19)
A new report by a United Nations expert gives Israel and its lobby carte blanche to smear the movement for Palestinian rights as anti-Semitic. Ahmed Shaheed, the UN special rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, issued the report ostensibly focused on anti-Semitism in late September. It adopts a controversial definition of anti-Semitism which is being promoted by Israel and its lobby groups. Human rights defenders have long warned that the so-called IHRA definition conflates criticism of Israel and its state ideology Zionism, on the one hand, with anti-Jewish bigotry, on the other. Shaheed’s report acknowledges that critics of the definition are concerned that “it can be applied in ways that could effectively restrict legitimate political expression,” including criticism of Israel’s violations of Palestinian rights.
Democrats will continue to abandon Israel, no matter who is next P.M. — Mondoweiss (9/30/19)
While these matters have contributed to the U.S. partisan divide, the major factors driving Democratic voters attitudes toward Israel have more to do with the very policies that all major parties in Israel will continue to pursue – the very policies that the Democratic establishment appears loathe to condemn (recall that in 2016, the party establishment would not allow mention of “occupation” or “settlements” in the party platform). In polling we conducted before Trump was even elected, we found among all voters a noticeable downward slide as we measured support for Israel (61%), support of Netanyahu (38%), and support for Israeli settlements (25%). In each instance there was a partisan divide – with Democrats less supportive of Israel, Netanyahu, and Israeli policies (in that descending order) than Republicans.
|