Problems viewing this email?
The Latest Research, Commentary, And News From Health Affairs

Thursday, April 22, 2021
Dear John,

Should the quality metrics used to judge providers’ performance take into account patients’ social risk factors? Researcher David Nerenz and coauthors assessed this debate and offered recommendations for policy makers.

A Key To Promoting Health Equity When Measuring Care Quality
Providers are increasingly subject to payment policies based on their performance, and there is consensus that we should consider clinical factors, such as disease severity, when measuring the quality of a provider’s care. But adjusting for social risk factors, such as poverty, remains controversial.

In an April 2021 paper as part of our Policy Insight series, David Nerenz and coauthors reviewed the arguments on both sides of this debate and posed five questions that policy makers should consider when making a determination for a particular quality measure. The authors concluded that "social risk adjustment should be the default option," and that it can be an important tool for promoting health equity.

Nerenz will join Alan Weil on next week’s A Health Podyssey to discuss this paper.

Nerenz and colleagues also examined social risk adjustment in a September 2020 Health Affairs Blog post. The authors discussed the distinction between health care quality and outcomes and how differences in patient income can affect providers’ quality ratings in value-based payment systems.

For additional content on access to care, the Affordable Care Act, health care spending, and more, read the April 2021 issue.

Today on Health Affairs Blog, Katie Keith provides the latest on 2021 Affordable Care Act Marketplace enrollment, navigator funding, and more. In a new GrantWatch post, David Lakey and coauthors discuss several Texas organizations working to integrate health care with the social services sector and highlight recommendations for better integration from a recent report.  

Also on the blog, Erin J. Stringfellow and coauthors argue that buprenorphine is an effective medication for opioid use disorder, but it is vastly underutilized—many say because of the
onerous X-waiver requirement for clinicians. Finally, John Toussaint and coauthors argue that Better Care Teams—multidisciplinary teams of providers that accept responsibility for the cost and quality of care for a given population—must be supported with value-based payment and transparent outcomes reporting.


On Earth Day, we are revisiting our December 2020 theme issue, Climate & Health. Papers in the issue covered topics including the health sector’s contribution to carbon emissions and other forms of pollution, how communities are affected by and adapting to the changing climate, and policies to protect against further damage.

If you find our free COVID-19 research, blog posts, and podcasts useful, please consider supporting our work.

Your Daily Digest
Adjusting Quality Measures For Social Risk Factors Can Promote Equity In Health Care
David R. Nerenz, J. Matthew Austin, Daniel Deutscher, Karen E. Joynt Maddox, Eugene J. Nuccio, Christie Teigland, Eric Weinhandl, and Laurent G. Glance

To Design Equitable Value-Based Payment Systems, We Must Adjust For Social Risk
Philip M. Alberti, Christie Teigland, and David R. Nerenz

Marketplace Enrollment Tops 12 Million For 2021; Largest-Ever Funding For Navigators
Katie Keith

Finding Effective Ways To Address Social Determinants Of Health
David Lakey, Elena Marks, and Eileen Nehme

Removing The X-Waiver Is One Small Step Toward Increasing Treatment Of Opioid Use Disorder, But Great Leaps Are Needed
Erin J. Stringfellow, Keith Humphreys, and Mohammad S. Jalali

Better Care Teams: A Key Element Of Better Care Plans
John Toussaint, Stephen M. Shortell, and Peter A. Wadsworth

December 2020 Issue | Climate & Health

Pre-order a discounted copy of the upcoming issue
 
 
 
 
About Health Affairs

Health Affairs is the leading peer-reviewed journal at the intersection of health, health care, and policy. Published monthly by Project HOPE, the journal is available in print and online. Late-breaking content is also found through healthaffairs.org, Health Affairs Today, and Health Affairs Sunday Update.  

Project HOPE is a global health and humanitarian relief organization that places power in the hands of local health care workers to save lives across the globe. Project HOPE has published Health Affairs since 1981.

Copyright © Project HOPE: The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.
Health Affairs, 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Suite 600, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States

Privacy Policy

To unsubscribe from this email, click here
.