Why would Adam Schiff feel the need to continuously lie to the
American people?
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

[AZ GOP]

Dear John,

WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU SAW OUR EMAIL FROM YESTERDAY
AFTERNOON! YOU CAN READ THE FULL EMAIL BELOW.

Adam Schiff has once again shown that he is unfit to serve as chairman
of the House Intelligence Committee. Schiff not only lied to the
American people when he gave his own "parody" of the perfect
conversation President Trump had with the leader of Ukraine—despite
having the actual transcript of the call—but it's now also being
reported by the _New York Times_ that Schiff had prior knowledge of
the leaker well before a formal complaint was ever filed.

Why would Adam Schiff feel the need to continuously lie to the
American people?

Schiff has shown time and time again that his outrageous language and
partisan motives make him completely unfit to serve as chairman of the
House Intelligence Committee. JOIN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ARIZONA,
AND REPUBLICANS AROUND THE COUNTRY, BY SIGNING OUR PETITION TO CENSURE
SCHIFF AND REMOVE HIM FROM HIS POSITION.
[[link removed]]

Thank you,


[[link removed]]

Dr. Kelli Ward
Chairman
Republican Party of Arizona


SIGN THE PETITION: CENSURE SCHIFF
[[link removed]]


-------------------------
From: DR. KELLI WARD <[email protected]>
Subject: #CensureSchiff
To: John < [email protected] >
[[link removed]]

John,

Last week, Arizona Republican Representative Andy Biggs
[[link removed]]
introduced
a resolution to censure Democratic Representative Adam Schiff, after
the Democrat Chairman opened a House Judiciary Committee hearing with
a fabricated version
[[link removed]]
of
the phone call that transpired between the President of Ukraine and
President Donald Trump. When confronted by a committee member about
his blatant lie, Schiff retorted: “My summary of the president’s
call was meant to be at least, part, in parody.”

[[link removed]]

Would you be afforded the same leniency by a judge if you fabricated
testimony?

Unfortunately, that is not the only lie Schiff has told. The _New
York Times
[[link removed]
reported
that the California Democrat knew of the C.I.A. officer’s
allegations days before the complaint was filed by the
so-called “whistle-blower.”


SIGN THE PETITION: CENSURE SCHIFF
[[link removed]]

According to the _Times_:

> “The C.I.A. officer approached a House Intelligence Committee aide
> with his concerns about Mr. Trump only after he had had a colleague
> first convey them to the C.I.A.’s top lawyer. Concerned about how
> that initial avenue for airing his allegations through the C.I.A.
> was unfolding, the officer then approached the House aide. In both
> cases, the original accusation was vague.”
The "aide" was actually Schiff's staff member suggesting the leaker
was advised by committee Democrats on how to write the complaint.

Isn’t it fascinating to hear the Democrats criticize
[[link removed]]
the
President’s characterization of the leaker as a "highly partisan
[[link removed]
person, yet the leaker did not contact committee Republicans? To
recall, Chuck Schumer cautioned
[[link removed]]
Trump
that intel officials “have six ways from Sunday at getting back at
you”. This looks and smells like Deep State collusion again with the
Democrats.

Adam Schiff has violated the presumption of innocence, going so far as
to accept "bogus evidence
[[link removed]
Schiff’s animosity toward President Trump has repeatedly compromised
any legal objectivity he may have had. That alone should disqualify
him from any leadership position.

It's time to censure Schiff.

Signed,

[[link removed]]

Dr. Kelli Ward
Chairman
Republican Party of Arizona

[Logo]

Arizona Republican Party

3501 North 24th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85016



©2019, All Rights Reserved

Paid for by Arizona Republican Party
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]