Diversity adds immense value to the judiciary.

Problems viewing this email? View it in your web browser.

Building a More Inclusive Federal Judiciary By Danielle Root, Jake Faleschini, and Grace Oyenubi The federal judiciary’s current legitimacy crisis is concerning—the public increasingly views federal courts as unfair, particularly to underrepresented groups and as partisan institutions. Also contributing to the courts' legitimacy crisis is the fact that the federal judiciary does not reflect the population that it serves, which has severe consequences for both the institution’s legitimacy and the parties who come before it. Among sitting federal judges, 80 percent are white and more than 70 percent are men. Judges who self-identify as LGBTQ comprise less than 1 percent of all sitting judges on the federal bench. Diversity adds immense value to the judiciary. Judges who self-identify as members of historically underrepresented groups draw on their life experiences, which helps them consider the interests of a variety of communities and instills public confidence in the institution, resulting in fairer decision-making. However, while previous administrations made concerted efforts to diversify the bench, President Donald Trump has appointed the least racially and ethnically diverse group of federal judges of any president over the past three decades. It will take years—if not decades—for the United States to have a federal judiciary that more closely mirrors the demographics of the country. But by taking concrete steps, Americans can turn today’s whitewashed judiciary into one that reflects the experiences of the populace it serves. Read more » Plus, watch the livestream for our corresponding event at 11:30 a.m. EST, Building a More Inclusive Federal Judiciary. FOLLOW US ON: Support CAP | Manage Email Preferences | Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe Center for American Progress | 1333 H Street NW, 10th Floor | Washington, D.C. xxxxxx

This email was sent to [email protected].