Piers Morgan’s first TV interview since leaving his morning show in the United Kingdom over controversial remarks about Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, will be with — no surprise here — Fox News’ Tucker Carlson.
On Monday, starting at 4 p.m., Morgan’s interview will air on “Tucker Carlson Today,” Carlson’s show on Fox Nation. That’s Fox News’ subscription-based streaming service. A portion of the interview will air on Tucker Carlson’s regular Fox News show on Monday night.
Morgan left his “Good Morning Britain” show last month when he said he didn’t believe many of the things Meghan said during her interview with Oprah Winfrey. Morgan got pushback not only from viewers, but colleagues. Morgan briefly walked off the set when criticized for having a personal beef with Meghan. After discussions with ITV, the network that airs “Good Morning Britain,” it was decided that Morgan would leave the show.
This will be Morgan’s first comments on TV, other than when he briefly spoke to reporters on the street after leaving “Good Morning Britain.” Carlson is likely to provide a sympathetic ear and, one would predict, a softball interview that paints Morgan as the victim of so-called cancel culture.
Pulitzer day is now in June
Every April, journalists in newsrooms around the U.S. learn who won a Pulitzer Prize for work published the year before. But this year, it will happen in June. The Pulitzer Prize Board announced the postponement on Thursday. The awards will instead occur on Friday, June 11.
“Like nearly everyone in America, we at the Pulitzer Board are eager to get off our screens and gather again in person. We are looking forward to the chance this year for the 18 members of the Board to meet safely and give each entry the intense consideration and spirited debate it deserves,” said Board co-chairs Stephen Engelberg, editor-in-chief of ProPublica; and Aminda Marqués González, vice president and executive editor at Simon & Schuster's adult trade publishing imprint.
How Alden can lose a bidding war for Tribune Publishing and still make a killing
It’s been a quiet few days in the competition between hedge fund Alden Global Capital and hotel entrepreneur Stewart Bainum Jr. (plus his group of like-minded wealthy men) to acquire Tribune Publishing.
To review, Alden has an offer, tentatively accepted by the company, to pay $17.25 a share for the Tribune stock it does not already own. Bainum has put in an upset bid of $18.50 a share (though his bid is contingent on finding financing).
Tribune shares closed at $18.03 Thursday, which says Wall Street is betting that Bainum’s offer or an even higher one will prevail.
In the manner of famous corporate raiders like Carl Icahn, however, Alden is set up to win either way. It bought most of its 32% stake — 11.5 million shares — from former Tribune Publishing Chairman Michael Ferro in November 2019 at prices between $9 and $13 a share.
So at Bainum’s offer of $18.50, Alden would walk away with $86 million, a 68% appreciation on its investment.
Plus the fine print of the tentative agreement says Alden gets a $20 million penalty if Tribune Publishing sells to someone else.
It’s almost certain that Alden figures to make more cutting staff and selling off real estate if it gains control of the chain’s Chicago Tribune and eight other metros. If not, it’s nice to be staring at an $106 million consolation prize.
A notable role
Nika Soon-Shiong, daughter of Los Angeles Times owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, has won over the newsroom, Maxwell Tani reports for The Daily Beast. Soon-Shiong, who is not on the masthead, “has emerged as a surrogate between the paper and its ownership family.”
“… Following the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd last year, she saw an opportunity to help ease tensions within the newsroom amid national conversations around race, policing, and institutional injustices in the news business. Soon-Shiong made several noteworthy editorial proposals, encouraging the paper to vastly increase its coverage of nonwhite communities in the Los Angeles area, and suggesting the paper avoid using the word ‘looting’ when covering the civil unrest over police brutality and racial injustice. The Times subsequently changed its style guidelines to specify when the paper felt it was appropriate to use the word.”