From Julia DeGraw <[email protected]>
Subject Fwd: Major Threat Alert: SB 16 heading to Senate Floor Vote!
Date March 31, 2021 2:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Dear John,

I wanted to make sure you saw my message from earlier this week about a “Major Threat” bill that’s heading to a vote in the state senate today!

Senate Bill 16 (SB 16) would set a dangerous precedent by waiving state land use laws by allowing high end housing to be built on land exclusively designated for agriculture. We need to build housing where there are services and where people already live; not on Oregon’s fertile working lands. Will you take action today to urge your state senator to vote NO on SB 16? [Click here: secure.everyaction.com/P1BcxLuZSEKlbCwVXRhJ7w2]

Thank you for all that you do,
Julia DeGraw
Coalition Director, OLCV
-------------------------------------

Dear John,

Oregon is the place we love today in large part because of our land use laws. It’s why we have our open spaces, farmlands, forests, and other breath-taking Oregon landscapes. However, critical protections are at risk of serious rollbacks because of Senate Bill 16 (SB 16), which would repeal certain farmland protections in Eastern Oregon. This “Major Threat” bill is heading to a final vote by the state senate on Wednesday — please email your senator today and urge them to vote NO on SB16! [Click here to send an email: [link removed]]

Here’s what Senate Bill 16 (SB 16) would do: it would waive Oregon’s land use laws and allow up to 100 new houses — not related to farming — to be scattered across 200 acres of exclusive farm use (EFU) lands in the large “Eastern Oregon border region.”

What that would mean:
-Scattered housing development, which would interfere with wildlife and water resources and increase the risk of wildfire in an area already rated as high for wildfire risk
-Some of our state’s most valuable and productive agriculture land will be used for high-end housing causing a major conflict with farming
-Greater stress to already scarce water resources in the border region

Those are just some of the ramifications if SB 16 passes. While it is true that Oregonians need more diverse and affordable housing types, they need homes near where they live, work, and play — inside our towns and cities. And SB 16 seems likely to result in high-end second homes, causing home prices overall to increase for those of middle- and low-incomes. Oregonians also need food and fiber, and Oregon has some of the best agricultural land in the world.

We should not, and need not, pit housing and food production against one another by treating working lands as vacant lands — which is why we need to tell Oregon state senators to vote no on SB 16. [Take action: [link removed]]

Help us stop this major threat to a healthy Oregon from passing by taking action today.

Thank you for all that you do,
Julia DeGraw
Coalition Director, OLCV

---------------------------------------------------

Oregon League of Conservation Voters
321 SW 4th Ave Ste 600
Portland, OR 97204
United States

If you believe you received this message in error or wish to no longer receive email from us, please unsubscribe: [link removed] .
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis