Two front groups with connections to DTE Energy and Consumers Energy launched a Facebook ad campaign last week ahead of a possible vote on solar energy legislation. DTE Energy’s Alliance for Michigan Power and Consumers Energy’s Citizens for Energizing Michigan’s Economy appear to be coordinating for the first time in recent years. Together, the advertisements target Democratic Representatives John Cherry, Jim Haadsma, Donna Lasinski, Mari Manoogian, and Ranjeev Puri.
The legislation, HB 4236, would lift the cap on utility distributed generation programs. The state’s current cap is set at 1 percent of a utility’s in-state peak load. Both Upper Peninsula Power Company and Consumers Energy hadagreed to double the 1 percent cap because of rooftop solar demand. Republican Reps. Ken Borton, John Damoose, Michele Hoitenga, Gary Howell, Steven Johnson, Gregory Markkanen, Brad Paquette, John Reilly, John Roth, and Douglas Wozniak are all co-sponsors of the legislation, along with Democrat Rep. Yousef Rabhi.
The advertisements that target the five Democratic representatives criticize “out-of-state” solar developers and claim that HB 4236 will raise the cost of electricity for everyone and undermine the state’s clean energy goals.
The House Energy Committee held a hearing on the bill in February. DTE Energy and Consumers Energy testified in opposition to the bill. Testifying in support, Michigan Environmental Council’s Charlotte Jameson said that there is no “economic or ratepayer reason to keep the cap” because the state eliminated the net metering program and replaced it with a tariff based on the cost of serving distributed solar customers.
Even if net metering rates were still in effect in Michigan, the Michigan utilities’ argument that solar customers did not pay their fair share of grid costs was always questionable. Data from the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) found that a cost shift from rooftop solar to non-solar customers does not occur until distributed solar penetration reaches 10% of electricity sales, and even then that the impact is minimal compared to other drivers of rate increases, like new gas plants or transmission lines.
The Consumers Energy front group is also running a misleading advertisement that claims “out-of-state special interests” caused the blackouts on the Texas electrical grid in February. There are ten active versions of this advertisement appearing on Facebook feeds in the legislators’ districts.
Utility companies in Texas – specifically Calpine, Vistra, and NRG Energy – all have said natural gas shortages affected their ability to operate their power plants. Additionally, the Texas Railroad Commission didn’t mandate winterization to prevent oil and gas wells from freezing and failed to ensure that gas producers and pipeline operators sought priority status for power during emergency outages, which occurred when the grid operator ordered utilities to perform rotating outages. Coal-fired power plants also failed to operate during the extreme weather event.
The advertisements also claim without evidence or explanation that lifting the cap on distributed energy subscribers will harm the state’s clean energy goals, even though Michigan’s renewable energy standard levels off this year at 15%.
Consumers Energy and DTE Energy have both pledged to reach “net-zero” carbon emissions, Consumers Energy by 2040 and DTE Energy by 2050; an analysis by the Sierra Club, however, gave the two utilities poor grades for their actual decarbonization actions after it examined their long-term energy plans. Sierra Club’s report, The Dirty Truth About Utility Climate Pledges, assigned a score to every utility based on its plans to retire coal, stop constructing new gas plants, and aggressively build out new clean energy by 2030. Consumers Energy received a C grade for its clean energy transition; DTE Electric received a D grade.
Deloitte released a similar report last year. The consulting firm also found “significant gaps” between many utilities’ net-zero commitments and their respective fossil fuel retirements and additions. The report also detailed how the utilities need to deploy considerably more renewable energy and energy storage, build transmission lines, and harness demand response and distributed solar generation to achieve net-zero goals. Speaking about rooftop solar capacity, the report said that utilities with net-zero goals “have harnessed only 9 GW out of a 400 GW potential in their territories.”
DTE, Consumers Energy wash their political advocacy through Alliance For Michigan Power, Citizens for Energizing Michigan’s Economy
In 2019, several articles detailed how DTE Energy was funding Detroit community leaders in an effort to present the appearance of public support for both the utility’s long-term energy plan and a proposal to severely reduce the compensation for rooftop solar customers under the new cost-of-service tariff program. Alliance For Michigan Power and another organization housed within it called Michigan Energy Promise were part of DTE’s campaign.
The $43.5 million that Consumers Energy has contributed to CEME is far more than the utility has reported in other political spending. It’s over 40 times greater than the total amount of money the utility’s PAC has contributed to Michigan candidates, or its total state lobbying expenditures, and is nearly 10 times larger than its federal government lobbying over the same four-year period. Although it is not known if Consumers Energy has contributed to CEME in since its $20 million contribution in 2017, the latest publicly available Form 990 for CEME showed that it still had over $20 million in total “net assets/fund balances” at the end of 2019.
