** Nikki Fried calls for end to utilities’ energy efficiency programs while endorsing their proposed goals of zero ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
By Alissa Schafer on Sep 30, 2019 03:59 pm
Nikki Fried, the top statewide Democrat in Florida, endorsed utilities’ plans for eliminating their energy efficiency goals and called for an end to utility energy efficiency programs in a brief filed ([link removed]) with Florida utility regulators on September 20, 2019. Facing public pressure, Fried reversed her posture and began calling for utility accountability and increased energy efficiency. However, her public statements contradict her office’s filing with state regulators, according to a review by the Energy and Policy Institute.

Fried has accepted more than $50,000 from utilities in campaign contributions in 2019.


** What is FEECA?
------------------------------------------------------------

Fried, Florida’s Commissioner of Agriculture, leads the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). FDACS is required to intervene ([link removed]) and advise on the Florida Energy Efficiency Conservation Act, also known as FEECA. FEECA, passed by the legislature in 1980, is a conservation goal-setting process that occurs in Florida every five years to reduce electricity consumption and fossil fuel use while increasing renewable energy.

FEECA sets energy efficiency goals for seven major utilities; five investor-owned and two municipal utilities. The investor-owned-utilities (IOUs) are:
* Florida Power & Light Company (FPL)
* Duke Energy Florida
* Tampa Electric Company (TECO)
* Gulf Power Company
* Florida Public Utilities Company

The municipal utilities required to file energy efficiency plans are Orlando Utilities Commission and Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA).

Utilities’ proposed energy efficiency goals ([link removed]) are subject to review by the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC). The PSC will make a final decision on the goals on November 5th, 2019.


** Utilities proposed canceling energy efficiency programs despite contrary analysis
------------------------------------------------------------

All seven FEECA utilities proposed ([link removed]) energy efficiency goals of zero, or close to zero, in filings to the PSC. Fried stated these goals were “satisfactory ([link removed]) ” in FDAC’s filing to the PSC, echoing talking points made by utilities, such as JEA, as reported ([link removed]) by WJCT in Jacksonville. FPL argued that energy efficiency programs are not cost-effective and will make rates go up, according to testimony from Jouliet Rhoulac before the Broward County Commission on June 11, 2019. (Video 2:46:40 ([link removed]) )

In South Florida, Broward County staff rebuffed utilities’ rate hike argument, stating that energy efficiency programs created a net benefit to customers when properly implemented. Florida consumers could save more than $1.7 billion, according to a cost-benefit analysis ([link removed]) cited by Dr. Jennifer Jurado, Chief Resilience Officer and Director of Broward County Environmental Planning and Community Resilience Division. She found low- to middle-income customers could save as much as $108 ([link removed]) a year, based on 2017 data.

Fried’s brief praised utilities’ “successful” low-income programs and outreach ([link removed]) despite Dr. Jurado’s analysis ([link removed]) . Over the last 3 years, TECO reached 23.4% of eligible customers for its low-income weatherization program, Duke Energy reached 14.94%, and FPL reached a dismal 0.68% of its eligible low-income customers, according to Jurado’s statement.


** Fried endorsed controversial methodology, recommended elimination of FEECA
------------------------------------------------------------

Fried condoned the continued use of the Ratepayer Impact Measure test, known as the “RIM” method, in calculating the cost of energy efficiency programs, despite the fact that Florida is the only remaining state to utilize this methodology ([link removed]) . The RIM method is commonly rejected by regulators because it allows utilities to count lost revenue from energy efficiency as a “cost,” thereby prioritizing shareholder profit over customer savings when determining if a program is “cost-effective”. The Florida Office of Public Counsel filed a brief ([link removed]) arguing that the RIM methodology is not a reliable test to apply to energy efficiency programs. The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) recommended the RIM test be eliminated in its comments filed before the PSC
([link removed]) .

Fried stated that while energy efficiency is important, utility programs are not impactful ([link removed]) . The brief credited building codes, federal energy efficiency standards, and customer initiative ([link removed]) as more effective at lowering energy consumption. Given the premise that utility programs are ineffective, Fried’s memo suggested the FEECA process should be scrapped altogether, ([link removed]) as it is “outdated and ineffective” ([link removed]) .

In its place, Fried’s brief recommended the adoption of a “public benefits charge” ([link removed]) to fund energy efficiency programs in the state. That would require an act of the Republican-controlled legislature, where utilities’ political power is notorious. Fried declined to provide details about the public benefits charge or how it would materially differ from utility energy efficiency programs required through the FEECA process. Fried’s brief was silent about how a public benefits charge is in ratepayers’ best interest but utility-sponsored energy efficiency is not.

While the FDACS office does not have the statutory authority to repeal FEECA, Fried’s recommendations, if implemented, would eliminate Florida’s utility-sponsored energy efficiency programs until replacement legislation could be passed at some undefined time in the future.


** Fried under fire
------------------------------------------------------------

Southern Alliance for Clean Energy attorney George Cavros called Fried’s brief “unhelpful” ([link removed]) , stating that it “endorsed the utility goals and their flawed methodologies and even called for the end of utility-sponsored programs.” Cavros added, “This is particularly stunning coming from an agency led by Commissioner Nikki Fried, who claims that consumer protection and climate action are a priority for her.”

Fried, via her political committee, accepted $25,000 from FPL last month, according to a report from the Florida Phoenix. ([link removed]) The Phoenix’s Mitch Perry reported, “the August 30 contribution came as the company was waiting to hear from a state regulatory agency regarding energy efficiency goals.” The Sunrise Movement challenged her to take the“No Fossil Fuel Money Pledge” ([link removed]) on September 25, 2019. That pledge requires politicians to reject contributions from utilities which generate over 50 percent of their electricity from fossil fuels, which would cover the major Florida utilities.

Fried accepted a $25,000 donation from TECO in the lead-up to the company’s July approval for its Big Bend gas-fired power plant, as reported ([link removed]) by the Energy and Policy Institute. Fried serves on the Power Plant Siting Board responsible for approving the plant’s construction. Fried was the sole vote against on the expected approval of that plant.

Fried’s office doubled down on its position on FEECA following ([link removed]) the Florida Phoenix article. Fried emphasized her recommendation to eliminate the FEECA goal-setting process in a September 26 statement ([link removed]) .

“Despite 40 years of goal-setting, our current energy efficiency and conservation process has outlived its usefulness. FEECA no longer holds utilities accountable for failing to establish meaningful energy goals,” Fried said in the statement.

Fried’s framing around utility accountability departs from the arguments her office laid out in its brief before the PSC. Fried’s public statements ([link removed]) may call for future efficiency legislation but, in calling for the end to FEECA, she effectively recommended the complete elimination of all utility energy efficiency programs for the state in the interim.

Image source: Twitter ([link removed])

The post Nikki Fried calls for end to utilities’ energy efficiency programs while endorsing their proposed goals of zero ([link removed]) appeared first on Energy and Policy Institute ([link removed]) .
Read in browser » ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]




** Recent Articles:
------------------------------------------------------------
** DTE Energy sets net-zero emissions goal by 2050 for electric subsidiary, but gas investments raise doubts about seriousness ([link removed])
** Southern Company and American Electric Power pledge to reduce emissions, but still support coal lobby group ([link removed])
** TVA attempts to chain local power companies to longer contracts in effort to prevent defection risk ([link removed])
** How Eversource customers in New Hampshire unknowingly fund the Edison Electric Institute ([link removed])
** Duke Energy’s zero-carbon goal undermined by massive gas rush ([link removed]

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2019 Energy and Policy Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website via our Contact Us page.

Our mailing address is:
Energy and Policy Institute
P.O. Box 170399
San Francisco, CA 94117
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]