From National Association of Scholars <[email protected]>
Subject CounterCurrent: Confucius Institutes Get a Makeover
Date March 23, 2021 5:59 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
How the Chinese Communist Party hides CIs through rebranding

[link removed]

CounterCurrent: Confucius Institutes Get a Makeover
How the Chinese Communist Party hides CIs through rebranding

CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Confucius Institutes; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------


** Featured Article - "China-Backed Confucius Institute Rebrands to Avoid Scrutiny" by Yuichiro Kakutani ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is rebranding Confucius Institutes (CIs) ([link removed]) , an evasive ploy meant to avoid the public eye and continue exerting its soft power on American campuses. This combined with the Biden Administration’s tepid approach ([link removed]) to U.S.-China relations, as epitomized by last week’s Alaska conference ([link removed]) , does not bode well for the future of foreign influence in American education.

CIs are, ostensibly, Chinese language and culture centers hosted by universities outside of the People’s Republic of China. Just five years ago, there were over 100 CIs in the United States alone. However, the National Association of Scholars discovered through our ground-breaking research ([link removed]) that CIs and their K-12 counterpart, Confucius Classrooms, actually operate as CCP propaganda and espionage spokes. Further, we found ([link removed]) that the CCP has deep, years-long ties to the College Board, partnering with the organization in developing the Advanced Placement Chinese Language and Culture course and examination. It is clear that the Chinese government is deeply embedded in all levels of American education, a position it will not give up easily.

Meanwhile, American opposition to Confucius Institutes continues to gain traction, with more anti-CI bills introduced ([link removed]) and more CIs closing—according to our count ([link removed]) , 72 CIs have closed or have announced their closure. While NAS does recommend that CIs close, we recognize that this is not always a win. In other words, some CIs close, while others “close.” Here’s what I mean:

Some Confucius Institutes simply close. The Institute ceases operations and its staff finds work elsewhere. Done and done. But, as we’re currently learning, many CIs pretend to close, only to resume operations under a different name, often retaining at least some of the same personnel and curricula. In these cases, the CIs have indeed closed, but the problem remains. This is why we must focus on curbing CCP influence in all of its forms, rather than merely latch onto the name “Confucius Institute” in our efforts.

In this week’s featured article ([link removed]) , Yuichiro Kakutani of the Washington Free Beacon examines the different moves the CCP has made to hide its malign influence on American campuses and considers why our institutions play along. He writes,

The persistence of the Confucius Institute in the U.S. education system speaks to how difficult it is to convince American schools to sever ties with Chinese entities. Hanban, the Chinese Ministry of Education-backed group that runs the Confucius Institute, has spent more than $100 million to support the institutes in U.S. universities. Many universities fear that ending ties with the Confucius Institute will cause funding shortfalls and program cuts.


Is fully expunging CCP influence from American campuses worth potential “funding shortfalls and program cuts”? We think so. And besides, U.S. institutions are capable of funding and staffing their own Chinese language departments—countless do so already.

In response to the CCP’s constant obfuscation, NAS is proud to announce “When Confucius Institutes Close,” a new project that will investigate this very problem and will seek to get to the bottom of Chinese government influence in American higher education. What exactly happens when CIs close? How many CIs have faked their closures? What are the CCP’s strategies for avoiding public scrutiny, and how can we counter them? These and more are the questions that will be answered through this project, led by NAS Senior Research Fellow Rachelle Peterson and our newest hire, Research Associate Flora Yan. Stay tuned for more details as we continue to untangle the seemingly endless web of CCP influence in American education.

Until next week.

David Acevedo
Communications & Research Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read More ([link removed])
For more on Confucius Institutes and American higher education:
[link removed]

March 18, 2021


** How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States? ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

NAS

Updated 3/18/2021: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their closing.

[link removed]

February 11, 2021


** Scholars Call for Biden to Reinstate Transparency for Confucius Institutes ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

NAS

President Biden has quietly withdrawn a Trump Administration policy proposal that would have required all colleges and K-12 schools to disclose any ties with Confucius Institutes.

[link removed]

January 09, 2021


** Turning a Blind Eye to Chinese Malfeasance Does Not Advance Justice ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

David Acevedo

An open letter from three organizations to President-elect Biden urges him to end the DoJ's China Initiative, denouncing it as racist. This will lead to less justice, not more.

[link removed]

December 22, 2020


** NDAA 2021 Plays Softball with Confucius Institutes ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

David Acevedo

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 is on the president's desk, but its restrictions on Confucius Institutes don't go nearly far enough.


** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.

============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2021 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.

Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis