Dear John,
Housing
In the December 2020 Housing figures just released, the number of
people waiting for social housing in Papakura has jumped to 661 people
with a “severe and persistent” housing need. Sadly this is up by
almost 500 people since National left the government benches in
2017.
Across Auckland the ‘state house’ wait list has increased by about
5,500 people of which about half are families. They are waiting about
177 days for a house to be available.
Nationally, 22,521 people are waiting for public housing and that
is about four times as many as when National left office.
National’s Housing spokesperson Nicola Willis has found that only
half of the ‘new’ social housing places sourced by the Government are
actually additional, newly built homes.
It is now known that Kāinga Ora spent more than $750 million
purchasing existing homes and re-labelling them as ‘state houses’.
This is locking even more first home buyers out of the housing
market.
A Progressive Home ownership scheme was promised by the Prime
Minister in 2017, but nearly four years later it has delivered 12
houses for just 12 families.
By contrast, the First Home Grant scheme started by the previous
National Government has helped 93,000 Kiwis to buy their first
home.
National when it was the government, proposed constructive
solutions to address the root causes of New Zealand’s housing
emergency and promised to unlock a surge in new house building.
Recently we offered to work with the Government on temporary
emergency measures like those used after the Canterbury earthquake,
that would quickly make more sections available to speed up housing
developments and get building started.
But the Prime Minister rejected this offer to work together
claiming they had this problem in hand.
We can’t afford to wait until 2024 for the Government’s long
awaited RMA reforms to take effect, we need to make changes urgently
and now to get more housing built.
National calls for inquiry into Valentine’s Day
cluster
My colleagues in the National Party and I want an inquiry into the
Valentine’s Day Covid-19 cluster to see where the response went wrong,
and what lessons we as a country can learn from this.
The scope of the inquiry would include:
- The performance of contract tracing
- Communication of public health messaging
- Whether the testing regime met expectations
- If saliva or antigen testing should be used more fully
- The legality of orders issued around testing and
self-isolation
National thought the idea of a three day lockdown in mid-February
was a bit optimistic and at the end of it we didn’t really know the
source of the original case.
Going back into level three a week later as a result was a real
blow for Auckland and Aucklanders. Level two across the rest of the
country meant events were cancelled and opportunities especially for
hospitality and tourism were lost.
These lockdowns must be avoided as they are costing the economy
half a billion dollars each week.
Over the last two weeks we’ve found out that our contact tracing
isn’t the ‘gold standard’ the Government would have us think. We
haven’t met critical measures in the latest two outbreaks, and all
locations of interest haven’t been disclosed to the public.
It has become clear that public health messaging needs to be
improved as different agencies send out different messages about
testing and the need to isolate. It has also shown that we need to
communicate these really important public health messages in all the
different languages spoken in our communities to make sure everyone
understands them.
While Auckland remains the hot spot for community cases of
Covid-19, we need to review the management of its roadway borders too.
Every lockdown has resulted in long queues of people trying to get
back to Auckland as well as trying to leave. Our police get constant
changes to instructions and they work in shifts 24 hours a day when
the borders close.
It is hard for people who through no fault of their own run into
big problems. Take the recent case of the students trying to head home
from their boarding school that was in level 2, late on a Friday
afternoon. They were blocked from being reunited with their families
at the border into Auckland with no reasonable explanation.
“We should always be aiming to improve our response so that level 3
lockdowns and above become unnecessary.
I hope that an efficiently run vaccination programme and roll-out
is going to help stop further lockdowns too. The definition of border
staff has to include everyone involved on the border from medical
staff, hotel staff, cleaners to airport staff and airline staff and it
would be a good idea to include their families too.
Going into lockdown should be our last resort and that means making
sure our response to any community outbreak is comprehensive and
targets the problem without disrupting more people and businesses than
is necessary.”
“If anything, the effect of Covid-19 and its ability to spread has
shown New Zealand there is a lot that must be done in respect of our
response when community cases arise. An inquiry into the Valentine’s
Day cluster is appropriate to show where we must improve to stop the
virus in its tracks.
Take care and best wishes,
Judith
Hon Judith
Collins http://judithcollins.national.org.nz/
|