The NAO did not equivocally say there was a national shortage, nor did they say there wasn’t one.

26 Feb 2021 | Full Fact's weekly news
View in your browser ([link removed])
FACT CHECK
Matt Hancock falsely claims National Audit Office said there was no national PPE shortage

On the Today programme, Health Secretary Matt Hancock claimed there has never been a national shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the pandemic. He said this was the conclusion of the National Audit Office, which published a report on PPE supply in November last year.

But the truth is more complicated. The NAO did not equivocally say there was a national shortage, nor did they say there wasn’t one.

Responding to Mr Hancock’s comments, a spokesperson for the NAO told Full Fact that “provider organisations we spoke to told us that while they were concerned about the low stocks of PPE, they were always able to get what they needed in time.”

However, they also noted that “this was not the experience reported by many frontline workers. Feedback from care workers, doctors and nurses show that significant numbers of them considered that they were not adequately protected during the height of the first wave of the pandemic.”

They also wrote in November that “demand for PPE was so high in April and May that stock levels were negligible for most types of PPE.”
What the Health Secretary said ([link removed])
Reader, can you help hold our politicians accountable for the claims they make in public? ([link removed])

During a pandemic, accurate information can be a matter of life and death.

We need your support to continue holding our politicians accountable for the claims they make about the coronavirus.

Could you spare a few pounds a month to support independent fact checking today?
Yes, I'll become a Full Fact Supporter ([link removed])
FACT CHECK
We don't know how much Test and Trace alone affects the spread of Covid-19 ([link removed])

Baroness Dido Harding told two MPs’ committees that the NHS Test and Trace programme (which she chairs) significantly reduced the spread of Covid-19 last October.

She claimed that research by the Department for Health and Social Care showed that Test and Trace was reducing the R rate (or the rate at which the virus spreads) by between 0.3 and 0.6 (a drop of between 18 and 33%).

The analysis did show this estimated effect in the R number, but this was not an estimate of the specific effect of Test and Trace. It was of its combined effect along with people with symptoms self-isolating.

The analysis estimated that the specific effect on R of the contact tracing element of Test and Trace was small, at about a 1.7-4.6% reduction.

People with Covid symptoms have been required to self-isolate since March 2020, two months before Test and Trace was launched. So Ms Harding’s quoted reduction in the infection rate comes from the combined effect of testing (which Test and Trace provides) and self-isolation with symptoms (which it may influence, but is not solely responsible for).

In short, it is hard to say how much of the effect was caused by the Test and Trace programme, and how much would have happened without it.

Baroness Harding did not include this point in her evidence. However, she did make it in a subsequent letter.
What's really going on ([link removed])
FACT CHECK
We can't say if Test and Trace has cost more than the Channel Tunnel ([link removed]) - yet ([link removed])

Widely shared social media posts are comparing the cost of the NHS Test and Trace programme with the cost of constructing the Channel Tunnel. The post claims the former cost £22 billion in “just a few months,” while the latter cost £16 billion “in today’s money” over the course of five years.

While £22 billion is the allocated budget for the first year of NHS Test and Trace in England, official figures show that by October only £4 billion had been spent. Although we do not yet know how much has been spent since, or how much is likely to be spent in future, we do know that it did not spend £22 billion in a few months - as was claimed in the posts.

As for the Channel Tunnel, there are conflicting estimates ranging between £9.5 billion and £20 billion. So what cost more? The honest answer is that we don’t know yet.

The budget for the first year of Test and Trace is higher than most estimates for the cost of the tunnel, but we don’t yet know how much of it will be spent, or how much will be spent in future years. It is therefore not correct to suggest that NHS Test and Trace has already spent more than the cost of building the Channel Tunnel.
The best estimates ([link removed])
MORE FACT CHECKS
Also this week...
* Mask wearing does not cause bacterial pneumonia ([link removed])
* The Covid-19 vaccine programme is not a “medical experiment” ([link removed])
* Many more people have died of Covid-19 than a viral Facebook post claims ([link removed])
* And a surprisingly large rat in Tooting is really just surprisingly close to the camera ([link removed])

Read our latest fact checks ([link removed])
Stop the spread of bad information ([link removed])

Find these updates useful? We'd be incredibly grateful if you could share our fact checks and help more people access good information.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Feconomy%2Feu-exports-january-2021%2F Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Ffullfact.org%2Feconomy%2Feu-exports-january-2021%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
[link removed] Share ([link removed])

============================================================
All the best,
Team Full Fact
** Follow us ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
** Like us ([link removed])
** Follow us ([link removed])
Have any questions or feedback? Please ** get in touch via our contact form ([link removed])
. We do not respond to direct replies to this email address.

Find out ** how Full Fact is funded ([link removed])
.

Copyright © Full Fact 2021 - All rights reserved

A registered charity (no. 1158683) and a non-profit company (no. 6975984) limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales.

Our mailing address is:
2 Carlton Gardens, London, SW1Y 5AA

We use Mailchimp to send you our emails and to see which articles are most popular. ** Read our privacy policy ([link removed])
or ** Mailchimp's privacy policy ([link removed])

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])