From Downsize DC <[email protected]>
Subject Did cops burn a man alive to save him?
Date February 25, 2021 5:43 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Ending qualified immunity might have prevented this

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Cops burn a man alive and violate procedure, yet qualified immunity rescues them

In Vietnam, soldiers destroyed villages to save villages ([link removed]) . Now, some cops have burned a man alive to prevent him from being burned alive ([link removed]) .


** Don't Use Your Tasers
------------------------------------------------------------

Three Arlington, Texas police officers were called to a home where a suicidal man had doused himself with gasoline. The cops had been trained to NOT tase ([link removed]) someone in those circumstances because a spark could ignite the gasoline ([link removed].) . A third officer on the scene had even warned the other two cops to NOT fire their tasers for that exact reason. The cops were also close enough to subdue the man without using weapons. But two of the cops fired their tasers anyway.

A spark ignited the gasoline consuming the man in flames. The house burned to the ground. The man died after several days of agony.

A court case followed. The man's family claimed that the cops violated both their rights and (as you just read) proper procedure.

This should have been an open-and-shut case. The Fourth Amendment ([link removed]) prohibits excessive force during searches and seizures. Two of the police involved violated their training. Testimony from both the family and the police provided ample evidence to prove the charges.

Still, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ([link removed]) dismissed the case on the grounds that the cops had qualified immunity ([link removed]) .


** Checks & Balances
------------------------------------------------------------

I want to point out two things...
1. Despite being imperfect, courts usually do more to protect our rights than legislatures do
2. This is an issue where legislatures are proving to be better than courts

Courts invented the doctrine of qualified immunity. Now, legislatures are taking action to reverse qualified immunity and related problems.

This is how checks and balances are supposed to work. Sometimes the court checks the legislatures and sometimes the legislatures check the courts. We've recently reported ([link removed]) progress in Colorado. We'll have more to share soon!

But most of this legislative reform is happening on the state level, which is why we're pushing to end qualified immunity at the federal level. Please join us if you haven't done so already...
Help End Qualified Immunity ([link removed])

Also, please help us recruit more people! Please contribute or start a monthly pledge ([link removed]) .

Jim Babka, President
Agenda Setters by Downsize DC
Today's Action: End qualified immunity ([link removed])

============================================================

Every issue of this newsletter is reproduced on our blog - sometimes with a modified title for "SEO" purposes. That blog post is also posted on the Downsize DC Facebook page. The Facebook algorithm will expose that post to more people if you leave a reaction (Like), a comment, or (especially if you) Share it.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2021 DownsizeDC.org, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website

Our mailing address is:
DownsizeDC.org
872 Mark Drive
Akron, OH 44313
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Downsize DC
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • MailChimp