View this email in your browser

February 24, 2021

Top House Democrat Working With Louis DeJoy on Reform Legislation, For
Some Reason

Plus, it looks like the end for Neera Tanden

 

Rep. Carolyn Maloney is more concerned with postal reform legislation
than the saboteur inside the Postal Service. (Alex Edelman/Pool via AP)

The Chief

If you're reading this Wednesday morning, the House Oversight
Committee is taking testimony from
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, Postal Service Board of Governors chair
Ron Bloom, and other stakeholders on the future of the post office. As
someone who has tried to put three holds on my mail in the last two
months without success I have a personal interest in the matter.

Amazingly, DeJoy still has a job, despite slow delivery times that have
persisted, not just after the election but after the holiday rush
.
Again, as someone who just got Christmas cards delivered to my house in
the last week, I have a personal interest. Union officials are pointing
to the pandemic, and thousands of postal workers under quarantine.
That's an argument to get them vaccinated as essential workers, but of
course the mail was being delivered decently enough after the pandemic
but before DeJoy was installed over the summer and began changing
procedures.

DeJoy remains in place because only the Board of Governors can fire him,
and with three vacancies on the board it remains under Republican
control, with all of its members nominated by Donald Trump. Biden could
fill the three vacancies and shift the balance of power on the board, or
he could fire the entire board for cause

and start over. (Or maybe fire everyone but Ron Bloom, a token
progressive on a board that must be bipartisan, and let him handle the
Postmaster General position.) Either way, that's what it would take to
dump DeJoy.

**Read all of our First 100 reports here**

Click to Support The American Prospect

But a disturbing piece from CNN

suggests that Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), who is chairing the Oversight
Committee hearing, is cautioning against firing DeJoy, in the hopes that
she can get his support for a bipartisan reform bill. Maloney's
colleague, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA), who runs the Oversight
subcommittee that includes the Postal Service in its jurisdiction, wants
DeJoy gone.  

The idea that you need DeJoy's help to get a bill that removes
financial hindrances and puts the agency on solid financial footing is
unfounded. The pre-funding requirement is unpopular, and I'd be
hard-pressed to name a single Democrat who would object to removing it,
not to mention several Republicans. "We will not be delayed or deterred
from our North star... of putting the Postal Service on solid financial
footing for years to come," Maloney said in her opening statement of the
hearing. What does that have to do with retaining Louis DeJoy?

Support Independent, Fact-Checked Journalism

The problem with DeJoy is that he's sabotaging the Postal Service with
his management tactics. His ten-year plan includes higher prices and
slower delivery
.
I don't see how that changes if the USPS has more money. DeJoy has
already failed in his obligations, and the idea that he brings along
Republicans to a reform bill is dubious.

Every day of delay is critical. The Postal Service just signed a 10-year
contract

for new vehicles, which, yes, are adorable
,
but only some of the 165,000 vehicles will be fully electric, with
others gas-powered. This is in direct contradiction to President
Biden's executive order

to fully electrify the government vehicle fleet. Why is this being
allowed to stand? (DeJoy said in his opening statement that he would
"see if our electric vehicle goals can be accelerated.")

Biden has said almost nothing about DeJoy while in office, with the
administration only promising to "work as quickly as possible to fill
board vacancies." Maybe work quicker, and give Maloney a call on this.
Working with DeJoy like he's a normal public official is really dumb.

We Depend on Your Donations

The Tweets Get You Every Time

The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee has
canceled a hearing

scheduled for today to vote on Neera Tanden's nomination for director
of the Office of Management and Budget. The Senate Budget Committee,
which also has jurisdiction, canceled their hearing

as well.

In Washington-speak, that basically means it's over. There's no
reason for Senators to take votes on a nominee that doesn't have
enough support to be confirmed. Unless Biden manages to turn around Joe
Manchin or one Republican, Tanden will not be running OMB. And there
likely won't be a vote, but a withdrawal.

There's a tick-tock

on how the White House "botched" the nomination, but it's probably too
narrative-friendly. I don't think it took long for the administration
to realize this was going to be a problem nomination. Pretty much every
new president loses a cabinet nominee. I'm not saying Tanden was a
sacrificial lamb, and frankly mean tweets shouldn't sink anybody
(there are plenty of other reasons Tanden wasn't the best choice). But
the possibility of a problem was pretty well understood early on. The
sense that this was a Ron Klain special could be correct, but his belief
in bulldozing Tanden through wasn't universal.

Donations Are Tax Deductible

It's not for nothing that there was already a pool of replacements
ready within minutes of Manchin's announcement. We have reported

that Gene Sperling is a likely candidate, hinting that this backup had
been in place for a while. Sperling is a Clinton/Obama expat who has
drifted left over the years; his latest book on the dignity of work is
quite progresive. Ann O'Leary, who most recently was chief of staff to
California Governor Gavin Newsom, is also on the short list; she has
been a longstanding champion of paid family leave
.
House Democrats, particularly the Congressional Black Caucus, are
pushing Shalanda Young
,
already nominated as the deputy OMB director. The first two are more
likely.

OMB will be fine, but what of the future of heavy-frequency Twitter
posters?

What Day of Biden's Presidency Is It?

Day 36.

We Can't Do This Without You

Today I Learned

* The FDA has deemed the Johnson & Johnson one-shot vaccine safe and
effective
.
I'd expect doses to be shipped by the weekend. (Wall Street Journal)

* It turns out California has its own homegrown mutation

to deal with, explaining much of the outbreak this winter. (Los Angeles
Times)

* Tim Wu at the National Economic Council

is great news, though DoJ is closer to the action, and the Big Tech
expats are rolling in there, our Alex Sammon reported

yesterday. (Politico; The American Prospect)

* Senate Democrats going wobbly

on the minimum wage, while Republican propose a $10/hour fallback
.
(Wall Street Journal; USA Today)

* Are the moderates coming for the state and local fiscal aid

next? (Washington Post)

* Today's executive order on supply chains is pretty meaningless
,
just two reviews. (Associated Press)

* What the bond market is telling us

about the Biden economy. (New York Times)

* The banks no longer need capital relief
,
they're making record profits. Time to remove it. (American Banker)

**Click the social links below to share this newsletter**

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

YOUR TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM

Copyright (C) 2021 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.
_________________

Sent to [email protected]

Unsubscribe:
[link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States