Hi there,

"That was the first time I experienced having to create a new category of policy to fit what Zuckerberg wanted," says an ex-Facebook employee on Mark Zuckerberg's refusal to censor radical conspiracy theorist Alex Jones's InfoWars content.

You read that right -- Mark Zuckerberg intentionally went out of his way to allow supporters of Alex Jones, a man who called the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre that resulted in 20 children being murdered a hoax, to continue spreading his conspiracy propaganda.

We saw the devastating consequences of Zuckerberg's unwillingness to prioritize morality over profits during the Jan. 6 siege on the Capitol. His refusal to regulate the 2020 election conspiracies, alt-right QAnon groups, and prominent white supremacist leaders culminated in five Americans dying that day.

We're going to need a massive outpouring of grassroots support to take on big tech, so we need to know how our most engaged supporters are feeling. So, tell us:

Should Mark Zuckerberg face consequences?
[YES][NO] >> [link removed]

Thank you for providing your critical input. It's important that we all stand together in the face of big tech.

Progressive Majority


[TAKE THE SURVEY] >> [link removed]










----

This email was sent to [email protected].
------------------------------------------------------
| Paid for by Progressive Majority PAC |
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, go to:

[link removed]