Dear John:

For many years, some activists have been promoting the controversial term "sexual and reproductive health and rights" (SRHR), which is distinct in important ways from the similarly controversial "sexual and reproductive health" and "reproductive rights," which have been accepted in UN agreements, unlike SRHR. Unlike the UN agreed terms, the new term SRHR has been defined as including "safe abortion rights," LGBT issues, and sexual autonomy for children, far beyond what has been agreed by the UN General Assembly.

This month's seminar explores the history of the term SRHR, how it has been used and defined, and where it has been consistently rejected from use. C-Fam experts make the case for why this term must be opposed in any negotiation, as its acceptance would signal a loss across multiple fronts for the international pro-life and pro-family movements.

Yours sincerely,

Austin Ruse
President

SPEAKERS:

Stefano Gennarini, J.D., Vice President for Legal Studies, C-Fam
Rebecca Oas, Ph.D., Director of Research, C-Fam

Passcode: 879319
Meeting ID: 815 7823 5662

One tap mobile
+16465588656,,81578235662#,,,,*879319# US (New York)
+13017158592,,81578235662#,,,,*879319# US (Washington DC)

Dial by your location
        +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
        +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
        +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
        +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
        +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)
        +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
Meeting ID: 815 7823 5662
Passcode: 879319

Find your local number: here.