| From | Dave Beaudoin, Ballotpedia <[email protected]> |
| Subject | The MOVs in the PCs |
| Date | February 22, 2021 10:37 AM |
Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
The margins of victory in Pivot Counties following the 2020 presidential election
͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
[The Daily Brew by Ballotpedia]
[Pivot counties]
** WELCOME TO THE MONDAY, FEB. 22, BREW.
------------------------------------------------------------
** HERE’S WHAT’S IN STORE FOR YOU AS YOU START YOUR DAY:
------------------------------------------------------------
* Average margin of victory in Pivot Counties has shifted 198% from Democrats to Republicans since 2008
* North Dakota Supreme Court rules on state legislative appointment
* Upcoming elections preview
[link removed]
** SHARE THIS NEWSLETTER
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]'s%20Daily%20Brewhttps://go.ballotpedia.org/e/481201/-Ballotpedia-org-subject-Check/38q668/1055834437?h=VhuDpPOBi5uWrWqkuhqjZOi4_vHTLMS4Xi1ffDb0JAo out this info I found from Ballotpedia&body=[link removed]
** AVERAGE MARGIN OF VICTORY IN PIVOT COUNTIES HAS SHIFTED 198% FROM DEMOCRATS TO REPUBLICANS SINCE 2008
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Ballotpedia is concluding its analysis of Pivot Counties in the 2020 presidential election with a look at the presidential margins of victories in these counties and how they have changed over time.
Pivot Counties are the 206 counties nationwide that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and Donald Trump (R) in the 2016 presidential election. In 2020, we have used the following categories to describe these counties:
* RETAINED PIVOT COUNTIES (181), which voted for Trump again this year, and
* BOOMERANG PIVOT COUNTIES (25), which voted for Joe Biden (D) on Nov. 3.
In 2008, Obama had an average margin of victory of D+12.3 ACROSS ALL 206 OF THESE COUNTIES. In 2020, the average margin of victory was R+12.0, A 198% SHIFT OF 24.3 PERCENTAGE POINTS TOWARDS REPUBLICANS.
We calculated the average margin of victory by taking the average of all 206 Pivot Counties’ margins.
When looking at just the 181 Retained Pivot Counties, the margin shift from 2008 increases to 26.2 percentage points. Of those 181 counties, Trump won a larger margin of victory in 113 compared to his 2016 results. Trump's margin decreased in 68 Retained Pivot Counties.
Though Biden won the 25 Boomerang Pivot Counties in 2020, the average margins have also shifted 10.2 percentage points towards Republicans when comparing 2020 results to those from 2008.
The chart below shows the overall change in average margins of victory by Pivot County category between 2008 and 2020.
The table below shows the margins of victory from each presidential election since 2008 using the categories above. The rightmost section shows the total change since 2020 both in percentage points and percent change. In Retained Pivot Counties, the average margin of victory has shifted 217% towards Republicans. In the 25 Boomerang Pivot Counties that voted for Biden, the average margin has shifted 76% towards Republicans.
[POV's]
The Pivot Counties where Trump’s margin of victory increased from 2016 were located primarily in the Southeast and Upper Midwest, concentrated in states like Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Counties where Trump’s margin decreased in 2020 were located primarily in New England and the Northeast.
Woodruff County, Ark., a Retained Pivot County, had the largest margin change towards Trump in 2020 with an 18.8 percentage point shift. Ziebach County, S.D., a Boomerang Pivot County, had the largest margin change towards Biden with a 10.5 percentage point shift.
To read our other Pivot County analysis, see our articles on:
* Pivot Counties in the 2020 presidential election ([link removed])
* Voter turnout in Pivot Counties ([link removed])
* Pivot County demographics ([link removed])
> KEEP READING ([link removed])
** NORTH DAKOTA SUPREME COURT RULES ON STATE LEGISLATIVE APPOINTMENT
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Regular _Brew_ readers know that when I learn about a fascinating elections story, I can’t wait to share it. One of Ballotpedia’s writers identified an interesting situation involving a North Dakota legislator who lost his primary last year but is currently the state representative from his district.
After a state Supreme Court ruling last fall, North Dakota Rep. Jeff Delzer (R) remains in office at the start of the legislative session following a primary defeat in 2020.
In North Dakota, each of the state’s 47 districts elects two representatives to the state House. Challengers David Andahl and Dave Nehring defeated Delzer in the 2020 primary election and proceeded to the general election for the district’s two seats.
Delzer’s primary defeat highlighted divisions between the legislator and Gov. Doug Burgum (R). During the 2020 primary election, Burgum donated over $3.1 million to a political action committee opposing Delzer. Burgum and Delzer have disagreed over the state’s budgeting in the past. Burgum, as governor, proposes a budget every two years, but the legislature approves the final budget. Delzer, as chair of the House Appropriations Committee, directs those budgeting proceedings in the House.
These divisions became apparent again following the Nov. 3 general election. Andahl and Nehring won election to the district’s two seats, but Andahl passed away a month before the election, leaving one seat immediately vacant.
Under state law, when a legislative vacancy occurs, the former legislator’s district party can appoint a replacement. Burgum argued that state law was unclear about instances where a candidate dies before the election and argued that he, instead, held appointment authority.
On Nov. 4, Burgum appointed Wade Boesham (R) to the seat. On Nov. 18, the District 8 GOP appointed Delzer. The following week, the North Dakota Supreme Court ruled that state law applied in this case and that the district party held appointment authority.
Delzer and Nehring were sworn in to represent House District 8 on Dec. 1.
> KEEP READING ([link removed])
[link removed]
** UPCOMING ELECTIONS PREVIEW
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday means elections! We’re watching several races that are happening tomorrow, Feb. 23. Here are some highlights:
* Texas House District 68 (special general election runoff) ([link removed]) : Craig Carter (R) is facing David Spiller (R). Carter and Spiller advanced from the general election on Jan. 23, earning 18% and 44% of the vote, respectively. The seat became vacant after Drew Springer (R) won a special election for Texas State Senate District 30 on Dec. 19, 2020. Heading into the special election, Republicans have an 82-67 majority in the Texas House.
* New York City Council District 31 (special election) ([link removed]) : Nine candidates are competing in the election to replace Donovan Richards, who left office after he was elected Queens Borough President in November. Richards served on the city council from 2013 to 2020.
* THE FEB. 23 ELECTION WILL BE THE SECOND ELECTION IN NEW YORK CITY TO USE A ranked-choice voting system ([link removed]) . In 2019, New Yorkers passed a ballot measure that instituted ranked-choice voting in special elections to local offices.
* [link removed] VILLAGE COUNCIL RECALL ELECTION: The special recall election will be held seeking to remove four Woodmere Village Council members from their seats. Woodmere is a town in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, with a population of 884 people as of the 2010 census.
* The recall effort began in October 2020. Recall petitioners cited the council’s failure to install a sidewalk along the village’s main road and its inability to keep the village’s website up-to-date as grounds for the recall. Petitioners also accused the four council members of pitting residents against each other. The recall opponents alleged that a lack of transparency about the contents of the recall petition misled the residents who signed it. Petitioners were required to obtain 45 signatures to get the recall on the ballot.
** EVERYTHING ON BALLOTPEDIA IS FREE TO READ
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
But it isn't free to produce. We depend on people like you to ensure that access to neutral and accurate information about American politics stays available to all. Donations to Ballotpedia are tax deductible and go directly toward producing great content like this newsletter.
Please consider donating today!
DONATE TO BALLOTPEDIA ([link removed])
BALLOTPEDIA NEWS ([link removed])
STAY CONNECTED
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed]
------------------------------------------------------------
GET OUR APP
[link removed]
SUPPORT BALLOTPEDIA ([link removed])
BALLOTPEDIA
8383 Greenway Blvd | Suite 600 | Middleton, WI 53562
Decide which emails you would like to get from Ballotpedia
Update your preferences ( [link removed] ) | Unsubscribe ( [link removed] )
COPYRIGHT © 2021. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
[The Daily Brew by Ballotpedia]
[Pivot counties]
** WELCOME TO THE MONDAY, FEB. 22, BREW.
------------------------------------------------------------
** HERE’S WHAT’S IN STORE FOR YOU AS YOU START YOUR DAY:
------------------------------------------------------------
* Average margin of victory in Pivot Counties has shifted 198% from Democrats to Republicans since 2008
* North Dakota Supreme Court rules on state legislative appointment
* Upcoming elections preview
[link removed]
** SHARE THIS NEWSLETTER
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]'s%20Daily%20Brewhttps://go.ballotpedia.org/e/481201/-Ballotpedia-org-subject-Check/38q668/1055834437?h=VhuDpPOBi5uWrWqkuhqjZOi4_vHTLMS4Xi1ffDb0JAo out this info I found from Ballotpedia&body=[link removed]
** AVERAGE MARGIN OF VICTORY IN PIVOT COUNTIES HAS SHIFTED 198% FROM DEMOCRATS TO REPUBLICANS SINCE 2008
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Ballotpedia is concluding its analysis of Pivot Counties in the 2020 presidential election with a look at the presidential margins of victories in these counties and how they have changed over time.
Pivot Counties are the 206 counties nationwide that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and Donald Trump (R) in the 2016 presidential election. In 2020, we have used the following categories to describe these counties:
* RETAINED PIVOT COUNTIES (181), which voted for Trump again this year, and
* BOOMERANG PIVOT COUNTIES (25), which voted for Joe Biden (D) on Nov. 3.
In 2008, Obama had an average margin of victory of D+12.3 ACROSS ALL 206 OF THESE COUNTIES. In 2020, the average margin of victory was R+12.0, A 198% SHIFT OF 24.3 PERCENTAGE POINTS TOWARDS REPUBLICANS.
We calculated the average margin of victory by taking the average of all 206 Pivot Counties’ margins.
When looking at just the 181 Retained Pivot Counties, the margin shift from 2008 increases to 26.2 percentage points. Of those 181 counties, Trump won a larger margin of victory in 113 compared to his 2016 results. Trump's margin decreased in 68 Retained Pivot Counties.
Though Biden won the 25 Boomerang Pivot Counties in 2020, the average margins have also shifted 10.2 percentage points towards Republicans when comparing 2020 results to those from 2008.
The chart below shows the overall change in average margins of victory by Pivot County category between 2008 and 2020.
The table below shows the margins of victory from each presidential election since 2008 using the categories above. The rightmost section shows the total change since 2020 both in percentage points and percent change. In Retained Pivot Counties, the average margin of victory has shifted 217% towards Republicans. In the 25 Boomerang Pivot Counties that voted for Biden, the average margin has shifted 76% towards Republicans.
[POV's]
The Pivot Counties where Trump’s margin of victory increased from 2016 were located primarily in the Southeast and Upper Midwest, concentrated in states like Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Counties where Trump’s margin decreased in 2020 were located primarily in New England and the Northeast.
Woodruff County, Ark., a Retained Pivot County, had the largest margin change towards Trump in 2020 with an 18.8 percentage point shift. Ziebach County, S.D., a Boomerang Pivot County, had the largest margin change towards Biden with a 10.5 percentage point shift.
To read our other Pivot County analysis, see our articles on:
* Pivot Counties in the 2020 presidential election ([link removed])
* Voter turnout in Pivot Counties ([link removed])
* Pivot County demographics ([link removed])
> KEEP READING ([link removed])
** NORTH DAKOTA SUPREME COURT RULES ON STATE LEGISLATIVE APPOINTMENT
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Regular _Brew_ readers know that when I learn about a fascinating elections story, I can’t wait to share it. One of Ballotpedia’s writers identified an interesting situation involving a North Dakota legislator who lost his primary last year but is currently the state representative from his district.
After a state Supreme Court ruling last fall, North Dakota Rep. Jeff Delzer (R) remains in office at the start of the legislative session following a primary defeat in 2020.
In North Dakota, each of the state’s 47 districts elects two representatives to the state House. Challengers David Andahl and Dave Nehring defeated Delzer in the 2020 primary election and proceeded to the general election for the district’s two seats.
Delzer’s primary defeat highlighted divisions between the legislator and Gov. Doug Burgum (R). During the 2020 primary election, Burgum donated over $3.1 million to a political action committee opposing Delzer. Burgum and Delzer have disagreed over the state’s budgeting in the past. Burgum, as governor, proposes a budget every two years, but the legislature approves the final budget. Delzer, as chair of the House Appropriations Committee, directs those budgeting proceedings in the House.
These divisions became apparent again following the Nov. 3 general election. Andahl and Nehring won election to the district’s two seats, but Andahl passed away a month before the election, leaving one seat immediately vacant.
Under state law, when a legislative vacancy occurs, the former legislator’s district party can appoint a replacement. Burgum argued that state law was unclear about instances where a candidate dies before the election and argued that he, instead, held appointment authority.
On Nov. 4, Burgum appointed Wade Boesham (R) to the seat. On Nov. 18, the District 8 GOP appointed Delzer. The following week, the North Dakota Supreme Court ruled that state law applied in this case and that the district party held appointment authority.
Delzer and Nehring were sworn in to represent House District 8 on Dec. 1.
> KEEP READING ([link removed])
[link removed]
** UPCOMING ELECTIONS PREVIEW
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday means elections! We’re watching several races that are happening tomorrow, Feb. 23. Here are some highlights:
* Texas House District 68 (special general election runoff) ([link removed]) : Craig Carter (R) is facing David Spiller (R). Carter and Spiller advanced from the general election on Jan. 23, earning 18% and 44% of the vote, respectively. The seat became vacant after Drew Springer (R) won a special election for Texas State Senate District 30 on Dec. 19, 2020. Heading into the special election, Republicans have an 82-67 majority in the Texas House.
* New York City Council District 31 (special election) ([link removed]) : Nine candidates are competing in the election to replace Donovan Richards, who left office after he was elected Queens Borough President in November. Richards served on the city council from 2013 to 2020.
* THE FEB. 23 ELECTION WILL BE THE SECOND ELECTION IN NEW YORK CITY TO USE A ranked-choice voting system ([link removed]) . In 2019, New Yorkers passed a ballot measure that instituted ranked-choice voting in special elections to local offices.
* [link removed] VILLAGE COUNCIL RECALL ELECTION: The special recall election will be held seeking to remove four Woodmere Village Council members from their seats. Woodmere is a town in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, with a population of 884 people as of the 2010 census.
* The recall effort began in October 2020. Recall petitioners cited the council’s failure to install a sidewalk along the village’s main road and its inability to keep the village’s website up-to-date as grounds for the recall. Petitioners also accused the four council members of pitting residents against each other. The recall opponents alleged that a lack of transparency about the contents of the recall petition misled the residents who signed it. Petitioners were required to obtain 45 signatures to get the recall on the ballot.
** EVERYTHING ON BALLOTPEDIA IS FREE TO READ
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
But it isn't free to produce. We depend on people like you to ensure that access to neutral and accurate information about American politics stays available to all. Donations to Ballotpedia are tax deductible and go directly toward producing great content like this newsletter.
Please consider donating today!
DONATE TO BALLOTPEDIA ([link removed])
BALLOTPEDIA NEWS ([link removed])
STAY CONNECTED
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed]
------------------------------------------------------------
GET OUR APP
[link removed]
SUPPORT BALLOTPEDIA ([link removed])
BALLOTPEDIA
8383 Greenway Blvd | Suite 600 | Middleton, WI 53562
Decide which emails you would like to get from Ballotpedia
Update your preferences ( [link removed] ) | Unsubscribe ( [link removed] )
COPYRIGHT © 2021. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Message Analysis
- Sender: Ballotpedia
- Political Party: n/a
- Country: United States
- State/Locality: n/a
- Office: n/a
-
Email Providers:
- Litmus