From xxxxxx <[email protected]>
Subject Texas Blackouts Show Its Power Grid Isn’t Ready for the Changing Climate
Date February 21, 2021 1:00 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[Some 4 million Texans are without heat, 12 million are facing
water problems, and hundreds are victims of carbon monoxide poisoning.
But, the leadership of Texas, a state captured by the fossil fuel
industry, has no plans for future extreme events. ]
[[link removed]]

TEXAS BLACKOUTS SHOW ITS POWER GRID ISN’T READY FOR THE CHANGING
CLIMATE  
[[link removed]]


 

Sammy Roth
February 16, 2021
Los Angeles Times
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

_ Some 4 million Texans are without heat, 12 million are facing water
problems, and hundreds are victims of carbon monoxide poisoning. But,
the leadership of Texas, a state captured by the fossil fuel industry,
has no plans for future extreme events. _

Former Gov. Rick Perry, Gov. Greg Abbott (seated), and Sen. Ted Cruz
at a 2016 news conference. This week Abbot blamed wind and solar for
Texas’ blackouts, Perry said Texans will gladly go “longer than
three days” without heat, and Cruz went on vacation. , Gromer
Jeffers Jr./Dallas Morning News

 

When a few hundred thousand California homes and businesses lost power
for several hours last summer, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz wrote that the
Golden State “is now unable to perform even basic functions of
civilization, like having reliable electricity.”

What Texans have experienced over the last few days was far worse.

More than 4 million homes and businesses saw their electricity shut
off as a powerful cold snap sent temperatures into the single digits,
driving up demand for heating while simultaneously freezing much of
the energy infrastructure that would normally keep people warm.
Rolling blackouts began in the wee hours of Monday morning and
continued into Tuesday evening.

At least 20 people were reported dead
[[link removed]] in
storm-related incidents in the eastern half of the country, including
several in Texas — and experts said it was all but certain that the
death toll would rise. Harris County, home to Houston,
reported hundreds of cases
[[link removed]] of
carbon monoxide poisoning as people tried to stay warm by using
portable generators or running their cars indoors.

But for all the differences between the events in Texas and
California’s more limited rolling blackouts
[[link removed]] last
year, there’s a common lesson: Extreme weather events are becoming
more frequent and more severe as the climate crisis worsens. And the
U.S. power grid is not prepared to handle the hotter heat storms, more
frigid cold snaps and stronger hurricanes of a changing planet.

“It’s gonna be bad,” said Ed Hirs, an energy economist at the
University of Houston.

Adding to the challenge, efforts to harden existing infrastructure
against extreme weather won’t be enough. 

Most of the country’s power comes from coal, oil and natural gas —
the very fuels driving climate change. The grid of the future will
need to be powered primarily by zero-carbon electricity sources, such
as solar and wind — and rebuilding the grid from top to bottom,
without further disrupting energy supplies, will be a delicate
balancing act.

California and Texas offer a preview of the risks, and potential
solutions.

In the Lone Star State, some skeptics of climate change blamed the
rolling blackouts on frozen wind turbines. The Wall Street Journal
editorial board used the emergency to argue
[[link removed]] that
the nation’s power grid “is becoming less reliable due to growing
reliance on wind and solar, which can’t provide power 24 hours a
day, seven days a week.”

The Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which operates the power
grid for most of the state, told a different story.

ERCOT data showed that wind farms generated less electricity overall
than the grid operator would have expected during a cold snap,
although at times they exceeded expectations
[[link removed]].
But the power sources that underperformed on the largest scale were
coal and gas plants that had equipment freeze over or couldn’t get
sufficient fuel on site as drilling operations and pipelines struggled
to work properly. At one point, 34 gigawatts of power were offline
[[link removed]] — more than a
third of the state’s generating capacity.

Wholesale electricity prices jumped by more than 10,000%
[[link removed]] Monday
as power supplies grew scarce.

“If we believe climate change is fueling these events, we can’t
just keep doing more of the same, or we’ll be in the same boat in
the not-too-distant future,” said Joshua Rhodes, an energy
researcher at the University of Texas at Austin.

It’s a boat Texans who lost power over the last 48 hours have no
desire to be in again.

In Austin, Lezli Regis, 42, was trapped by the storm in her
one-bedroom apartment with her 9-year-old son Theo and their three
cats, all surrounding roads impassable. She tried to go to work
Saturday at the veterinary clinic she manages but had to turn around.
She lost power and hot water at the start of the storm, and most of
the contents of her refrigerator spoiled. 

By Tuesday, she was running out of food.

“We might start eating cat food, because there’s literally nothing
else,” she said.

Texas wasn’t the only state to find itself short on power amid the
storm. The Southwest Power Pool, which oversees the electric grid
across parts of 14 states from Louisiana to Montana, also ordered
rotating outages
[[link removed]] Monday
and Tuesday.

But Texas has suffered the worst blackouts, and residents have vented
their frustration on social media, with many pleading for help from
ERCOT, Gov. Greg Abbott and Sens. Cruz and John Cornyn. Some Texans
wrote that they were struggling to care for newborns and infants
without power or heat. Others worried about nursing homes that had
been without power overnight.

Vanessa Daniel, a U.S. Army veteran, was sheltering with her
11-year-old son at their home in Killeen, where they lost power and a
refrigerator full of food due to the storm. Daniel, 32, said she was
worried about elderly neighbors and those with babies, and about a
nearby warming center where the coronavirus might spread.

“This is incredibly careless on the part of our leaders to leave
people without power for days at a time,” she said.

While rising global temperatures are the best-known consequence of
burning fossil fuels, there’s also a growing body of scientific
evidence [[link removed]] linking
this kind of cold spell across the middle of the country to rapidly
warming conditions in the Arctic. 

While the exact mechanisms underlying those links aren’t clear yet,
the simple reality is that heat, cold and hurricanes are “all in the
same bucket,” said Jennifer Francis, a senior scientist at Woodwell
Climate Research Center in Massachusetts.

“As we continue to basically dump our waste products from fossil
fuel burning into the atmosphere and increase the thickness of the
greenhouse blanket around the Earth, we’re changing the climate
system in many ways,” Francis said. “Extreme events of many sorts
are going to become more frequent, more intense and longer-lasting.”

The nonprofit research group Climate Central analyzed federal data
last year and found that hurricanes, wildfires, heat storms and other
extreme weather events caused 67% more power outages
[[link removed]] in
the United States during the decade ending in 2019 than they did
during the previous decade.

Climate change was a factor in California’s blackouts last August;
officials said the state experienced four of its five hottest August
days
[[link removed]] in
the last 35 years. Temperature records were shattered across the West,
limiting California’s ability to make up for its energy deficit by
importing electrons from other states. The power was needed elsewhere.

At the same time, global warming alone didn’t force the lights to go
out. State officials laid some of the blame on their own poor
planning, including a failure to compel utilities to build enough
clean energy infrastructure that can power the grid when solar panels
stop generating each evening, such as lithium-ion batteries or
geothermal power plants
[[link removed]].

Unlike California, which is targeting 100% climate-friendly
electricity by 2045
[[link removed]],
Texas has no requirements to phase out fossil fuels. 

But for all the political and economic power that oil and gas
companies still wield in Texas — and for all the time Cruz and some
other conservatives spend decrying renewable energy — Texas got 23%
of its electricity from wind turbines last year.

Nearly two-thirds of Texas’ power comes from fossil fuels, compared
with just one-third in California. But there’s still plenty of room
for Texas to grow its wind and solar industries, and experts say it
can do so while better preparing for extreme weather.

For one thing, the state operates most of its power grid as an island
separate from the rest of the country, with few connections to the two
major electric systems that tie together most of the lower 48 states.
Originally devised as a means of avoiding federal regulation
[[link removed]] of
Texas energy markets, the isolation today means ERCOT is relatively
limited in its ability to import supply from other states.

“There’s a lot of excess power in this country, but we just
don’t have the extension cords to bring it here,” Rhodes said.

There could be climate benefits, too, from building more power lines
to connect Texas with other parts of the country — mainly from
making it easier to access far-flung solar and wind energy.
Researchers say it’s easier and cheaper to reduce planet-warming
emissions on larger power grids
[[link removed]],
because even if it’s cloudy and still in some places, it’s usually
sunny and windy elsewhere. 

Building better-insulated homes could be another important change.

In the Northeast and Great Lakes regions, homes are typically built to
retain heat during near-zero temperatures. Not so in Texas, where hot
spells, rather than cold snaps, are typically the greatest worry.

Upgrading buildings with thicker walls, strategically placed windows
and other energy-efficiency measures would save lives, protect people
who can’t afford higher power bills and reduce the need to spend
large sums of money expanding the power grid, said Emily Grubert, a
social scientist and engineer at Georgia Tech. But
“weatherization” programs that help people with the upfront costs
of those fixes must be improved, she added, because they often exclude
the people who need them most.

“Maybe the building is condemned, or there are holes in the roof or
the walls that end up making these buildings ineligible for the
support programs, because the building is considered to be in such bad
shape that it isn’t worth investing in,” Grubert said. “The
programs don’t allow you to spend money on repairs, just
upgrades.”

Rooftop solar power paired with batteries is another possible answer
for Texans, and Californians, looking to keep the lights on.

In the Houston suburb of Sugar Land on Tuesday, Mark LeClair, 43, was
trying to stem storm damage to his kitchen, where a pipe burst even
after he wrapped it in insulation. He works remotely for a
California-based construction company, managing software, and recalls
having to work through the Golden State’s brownouts in August. A
native Texan and lifelong Republican, he credits oil and gas with
fueling the state’s economy. But he said this week’s outages have
him planning to install solar panels at his house.

“We need to move toward sustainable energy,” he said.

Cruz disagrees. During California’s grid emergency last summer,
he wrote
[[link removed]] that Joe
Biden, Kamala Harris and U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.),
a leading supporter of the Green New Deal, “want to make CA’s
failed energy policy the standard nationwide.”

With President Biden pledging to achieve 100% clean energy by 2035 —
and solar and wind now the cheapest sources of electricity
[[link removed]] in
most of the world — that’s the way the country is going. The key
question is whether policymakers like Cruz are willing to get creative
to make it work, or whether they’ll double down on a power grid
that’s already beginning to fail.

_[Sammy Roth covers energy for the Los Angeles Times and writes the
weekly Boiling Point
[[link removed]] newsletter. He
previously reported for the Desert Sun in Palm Springs. Times staff
writer Molly Hennessy-Fiske contributed to this report from Houston_.]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web [[link removed]]
Submit via email
Frequently asked questions [[link removed]]
Manage subscription [[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org [[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Portside
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • L-Soft LISTSERV